Will the announced cease-fire in Syria hold? We should all hope it
will because the situation in that country – indeed in the entire region and
beyond it – has been a five-year horror story that only a biblical type
dogma-nut would love to see continue.
Of course, even a nut of that caliber will not come out at
this stage and say openly he would love to see the blood continue to flow, and
the refugees continue to flee. But there was a time, at the start of that civil
war, when Jewish fanatics came out and openly said they love the idea that both
sides in the conflict are killing each other. Well, these bloodthirsty savages
must have had their fill of horror and human misery to last them a lifetime.
But there is another way for the same kind of fanatics to
express the same kind of craven desires, even at this level of the horror,
without appearing to be so bloodthirsty or savage they would be run out of
town. One of these savages is Benny Avni who wrote: “Why Kerry's Syria
cease-fire is already failing,” published on September 14, 2016 in the New York
Post.
The way to express that kind of depravity while sounding as
“wise” as a temple
Pharisee Syria . Thus,
Avni started his presentation with these words: “Another one of Kerry's 'Hail
Mary' deal is well on its way to collapsing.” This is to be as bloodthirsty as
always, as savage as ever.
Avni goes on to savor the sweet taste of blood by listing the
delicious events that did much to water his mouth. Here they are: (1) “Fire is
yet to cease.” (2) “The UN was to start delivering humanitarian aid … but aid
convoys hadn't yet moved.” (3) “Syrians are yet to benefit from the
Kerry-Lavrov handshake.” (4) “Kerry himself 'reportedly' was skeptical the deal
would work.” (5) “The deal will get even wobblier next week.” There is enough here
to throw a banquet for a flock of vampires.
Having alluded to the content of his craven desires, he let
the readers know what he wants to see unfold in Syria . To do this in a subtle way,
he delivered his message in a language that is so ambiguous it would not
provoke someone to run him out of town. Avni then gave a detailed account as to
why the cease-fire must not hold in Syria , and why an alternative to
the Kerry effort must be sought.
Avni begins this part of the presentation by lamenting the
current situation as it looks to him on the ground: “The Russians are
interested in squashing any alternative to [Assad] including the groups America has
tried to cultivate since the war began.” But because “there's no military
solution” or a “diplomatic solution for Syria,” and because it looks like
“Assad [shall] remain in power” insisting along with everyone else that “Syria
must remain a unified country … outsiders [must now] come up with a viable
partition plan for Syria”.
Partitioning all the Arab countries if not all Muslim
countries, being the grand strategy that the Jews have developed to dominate
the region … and go from there to dominate the world, it is not surprising to
see them call for this to be Syria 's
fate. The problem as Avni sees it, however, is that Obama did not get it, which
is why Putin, whose “goals are at odds with ours,” got there first and started
“turning Syria
into a Russian outpost”.
Where to go from here? Benny Avni did not ask this question
but answered it nonetheless. Because he knew that his answer might hurt some
people needlessly, he used his writer's skills to put things delicately. To
this end, he suggested, without proof, that President Obama believes “America has no
skin in the Syrian game”.
Because of that, Benny Avni went on to say: “we should steer
clear of peacemaking there.” He said “we” but the message is directed at Barack
Obama.
Why did Avni ask for that? This is why: “So the next
president will have to walk away from Kerry's deal-making, and listen to the
hawks advocating a more muscular approach in Syria ”.