Andrew Bacevich wrote: “The Iraq reckoning still to come,” an
article that was published on March 19, 2018 in the New York Daily News.
Conscious of the reality that the American public wants accountability for what
he calls “the blood sacrifice vote,” Bacevich asked a series of “why” questions
concerning the Iraq
war. He then said if politicians are to regain credibility, the political
establishment will have to answer those questions. No kidding!
Who is this guy trying to kid? Which politicians – 15 years
after the fact – remain at their posts to answer the questions he is posing?
No, Andrew Bacevich is not asking questions because he wants answers; he is
asking questions to show that no answer will be forthcoming ... in consequence
of which he wants the readers to forget about the whole thing and move on.
Bacevich asked three questions: Why was the Iraq war
necessary? The answer is that the Jews engineered it to advance their agenda.
He asked: Why was the conduct of the war bungled? The answer is that the Jews
did not want to liberate Iraq
as they pretended; they wanted to destroy the gains achieved by the Baath Party
because it stood for Arab Renaissance and the quest for Arabs to take their
place under the sun. He asked: Why do Americans still await a public inquiry
into this fiasco? The answer is that the inquiry was actually held. It's just
that it wasn't held “in public” but held “by the public.” Bacevich knew that,
as he pointed out when he wrote: “Communities that paid a high price for the
Iraq War in terms of casualties tended to vote for Trump.” It's that the people
inquired and then decided how to respond at the ballot box.
Thus, the pressing question that begs for an answer: Why
does Andrew Bacevich wish that America
would forget that history? The answer is that he wants the history to be
forgotten for the same reason that the editors of the New York Daily News, who
published the article, want that history to vanish. They both feel that the
Jewish machinations, which led to an Iraq calamity the likes of which America
did not experience since the Vietnam War, are about to be revealed. The worry
is that when the public will get acquainted with the details of those
machinations, it will become aware of what else the Jews are preparing for America . This
will prompt the public to come down on the heads of the Jewish leaders like a
ton of bricks, and stop them cold in their tracks.
To avoid this outcome, Andrew Bacevich came up with an
ingenious trick. Having detected the kind of debate that's shaping for the next
election cycle, he did the opposite of what creative writers usually do.
Instead of transposing the past onto the present to predict the future, he
transposed the future he already knows will be dreadful onto the past. Doing
this, allowed him to take the Jews out of the picture and blame the calamity
that was Iraq
on everyone else … sparing absolutely no one. What follows is a condensed
version of what Bacevich has said to confuse the upcoming debate:
“Hillary Clinton voted for the war, then disavowed it,
showing little sign of grasping its significance. The arguments depicting the
war as essential turned out to be wrong. So too did predictions of a clean,
quick victory resulting in Iraq 's
transformation into a liberal democracy. Worse, the costs of the war in terms
of lives lost and treasure expended exceeded what anyone had predicted:
thousands of U.S.
troops killed, tens of thousands of lives damaged, trillions of dollars spent.
For what? Clinton
offered no answer to that question. Neither on the GOP side did Bush, Rubio,
Cruz, Christie, Carson or Fiorina. Only Trump called Iraq a mistake, claiming (falsely)
to have opposed the war before it started. Saddam Hussein is gone. The Baath
party is no more. The Islamic State –– created as a direct result of the U.S. invasion
–– has been defeated. Even so, the problems Operation Iraqi Freedom was meant
to resolve persist. Let me emphasize that nothing Trump said in 2016 suggested
he had a clue about how to solve those problems. Candidate Trump didn't know
squat about foreign policy”.
As can be seen, Bacevich dumped a ton of verbiage – not to
answer the three questions he asked – but to create a false debate he says has
started already between people who wish to forget the war and move on, and
those who were disabled by the war as well as those who lost loved ones, and
are still hurting.
In reality, however, this is the fake debate Andrew Bacevich
wants the people to have during the next election cycle so that no one will ask
the only relevant question pertaining to the Iraq war: How did it happen that
the office of Vice President Dick Cheney became the war-room in which the Iraq
war was hatched and conducted by those who called themselves “children of
Holocaust survivors”?
Their agenda was to get back at humanity for what they say
the human race did to them during the Second World War and for thousands of
years before that. They implemented their satanic revenge in the open, and no
one in America
lifted a finger to stop them.