The word “regime” has two meanings. It refers to the way of
doing things such as having a method by which to implement an operation. It
also refers to an established authority such as a government, for example.
The word is used in the above title twice to refer to both
meanings. That's because “regime change,” which has come to mean toppling
governments in the hope of replacing them with more pliant ones, proved to be a
calamity like this planet has never seen before. Look at Libya and the Levant,
and you'll know what the regime changers have wrought.
Because these people are relentless in their advocacy for
more of the same, we must see their effort as being a part of a comprehensive
method aimed at altering the established world order no matter the cost. Their
method of operation – called regime – must be discredited and rejected for
peace to return to this planet of ours.
Two regime changers, Reuel Marc Gerecht and Ray Takeyh, came
together and wrote an article advocating not just regime change but a change of
attitude toward the idea of regime change. They want us to love regime change –
undoubtedly as much as they do. To be accurate, however, it must be said that
they didn't use the word “love.” What they did instead, was negate its
opposite, which in this case, was the word “fear”.
That's what you see in the title of their piece: “Don't Fear
Regime Change in Iran,” followed by the subtitle: “For the past century it has
been in a struggle between oppressive rulers and a freedom-hungry public.” The
piece was published on June 12, 2018 in the Wall Street Journal.
The two writers have a fancy name for the regime they
devised. Again, to be accurate, it must be said they didn't fully flesh out
their conception; they only suggested – without giving any detail – how and why
it will cause the desired change in the countries that refuse to toe the line.
They call their concoction: “Regime-collapse containment policy.” What follows
is how they suggested implementing it in the Iranian situation:
“The Islamic Republic, lacking a reliable banking system, is
unable to attract enough investors. It is probably internally weaker than the
Soviet Union was in the 1970s. Devising a strategy to collapse the clerical
regime isn't difficult: The U.S. can draw on Persian history and experience
with the Soviet Union. It will require patience. The biggest hurdle for
Washington is self-imposed: It needs to take seriously the Iranian quest for
democracy”.
To give credence to their useless enterprise –– for which
they got paid handsomely at the expense of the taxpayers –– Gerecht and Takeyh
resorted to the approach that made millionaires of the Jews who ruined America,
advising it on how to self-immolate in the forums of the world, implementing
the Judeo-Zionist scheme of attacking those who strive to remain free of Jewish
imperialism. What Gerecht and Takeyh did is distort reality and spin historical
events in ways that will dizzy the readers.
To justify saying that the regime in Iran is fragile and
prone to being toppled, the two writers came up with the idea that Iran had
been in turmoil for a century. But seeing that this was not enough to make a
good story, they hit on the idea of saying that the 1953 toppling of the Iranian
Prime Minister Mossadegh was not a CIA operation, after all. They said it was
an Iranian undertaking through and through; one in which the CIA tried to play
a minor role at the start but quickly withdrew when it realized it was not
needed.
But why was the CIA not needed? It was not, say Gerecht and
Takeyh, because “Iran's politicians, military men and mullahs came together to
take down the premier.” All of that happened, they said, because Mossadegh
turned out to be a horribly autocratic and vainglorious character that “rigged
elections, sought to disband Parliament, and usurped the powers of the
monarchy.” And all this was made worse, they went on to say, by the fact that
Mossadegh knew nothing about democracy or the economics of petroleum.
Well my friend, if there is a lesson to be learned from this
mockery, it is that the Jewish establishment will never give up on the quest to
implement a Pax Judaica disguised as a Pax Americana. Its operatives will spin
any fact, distort any historical event, and tell any story that will advance
the Judeo-Israeli causes.