The
ultimate aim is to put into effect the dictum: “divide and conquer.” There are
many ways to do this; one of which being the Jewish way, proven to be extremely
effective in America.
In
fact, that effectiveness is everywhere to see in America. You see it: (1) In a
Congress that's hopelessly fragmented on every American issue, yet beholden in
a solidly bipartisan way to every Jewish whim. (2) In a State Department that
sees the two sides of every international issue except those pertaining to
Israeli matters where there is only one choice to make; the Israeli way or the
highway. (3) In the media coverage of Middle Eastern affairs where events are
interpreted from two angles: The way the Jews tell the Jewish side of the
story, and the way the Jews tell the Arab side of the story.
These
being the outcomes of divide and conquer, how did the Jews achieve this much
success? Well, you need to have lived half a century, and seen how the Jews did
it. But if you're too young to have seen it, you can do what astronomers do
when they study the evolution of a galaxy. They look into space and see various
galaxies at different stages of evolution. They connect the dots, and draw a
complete picture as to how a galaxy begins, how it develops through different
stages, and how it ends up being a mature galaxy.
You
can employ that same method to determine how the Jews have managed to divide,
conquer and take control of America's political and diplomatic life. You may
study two articles, which you'll find helpful in this regard. One article came
under the title: “What happened to Arab Support for Palestinians?” written by
Sarah Feuer and Neri Zibler. It was published on November 16, 2018 on the
website of the Washington Institute. The other article came under the title:
“Linda Sarsour Apologizes for Failure to Condemn Anti-Semitism,” written by
Jack Crowe and published on November 21, 2018 in National Review Online.
What
is common to both articles, is the celebration by the writers of the idea of
wedges coming between people. This is how the divide part of “divide and
conquer” begins the process. Once you've established a feel for this reality,
you'll sense the writers' expectation that the “conquer” part will soon follow.
The
Sarah Feuer/Neri Zilber article is about the fantasy that the Arabs have
abandoned the cause of Palestinians. More than that, the writers even assert
that the Arab countries are moving apart from each other on this issue and
other ones too. In fact, this happens to be the grand fantasy of the Jews since
Israel came into existence. However, the Jews failed to have Iraq split in
three parts, and failed to have Syria split in several parts. To compensate for
these failures, they started to pretend that the fantasy had come true, and the
Arab split was happening.
Here
is how Sarah Feuer put it: “It's that the nature of Arab support for the
Palestinians has become fragmented; a shift reflecting the general
fragmentation afflicting the Arab world”.
And
here is how Neri Zilber put it: “The Israeli government has, for a few years
now, been marketing the notion that the Palestinian question no longer troubles
the rest of the Arab world”.
As
to the Jack Crowe article, it is supposed to be a reporting piece and not an
opinion piece. And yet, what you encounter is a title that suggests Linda
Sarsour had failed to condemn Anti-Semitism. But here, in condensed form, is
what Sarsour has said: “Amid the media storm, our message has been lost,
causing harm and pain. We should have been faster and clearer in helping people
understand our commitment to fighting anti-Semitism. We regret that.” This is a
statement of regret that the media storm distorted the message of the Women's
March, and not an admission of failure to condemn anti-Semitism.
In
fact, this kind of opinion dissemination disguised as news reporting is what
sets the stage for the Jews to conquer in their grand scheme to “divide and
conquer.” As to the divide part of the scheme, you can see it further down the
Jack Crowe article. It came in this form:
“Mallory
faced backlash in February when she posted a video from Farrakhan's address in
which he railed against the satanic Jew. The Women's March made clear that
Farrakhan's beliefs are not aligned with the Women's March principles. But
Mallory refused to condemn Farrakhan personally. Sarsour also came under fire
for her praise of Farrakhan”.
This
is clearly intended to drive the wedge between the Women's March and a large
group of African Americans who cherish the American Louis Farrakhan —
a man that hurt no one — as much as the Jews
cherish the bloodthirsty and serial war criminal named Benjamin Netanyahu … who
is not even an American.