Monday, July 8, 2019

They label Americans as good or bad for Israel

No dictator anywhere in the world at any time since the start of civilization, has been able to exert a degree of control over his or her society the way that Jews have been able to exert over the American population –– that's not even their society.

In fact, the Jews have managed to establish a regime that allows them to dictate to the American people, who among them is fit to associate with, and who is not fit to talk to or take a picture with or say hello to. A couple of recent articles –– from among the hundreds that appear every year –– show how the Jews have turned America's First Amendment in the Bill of Rights, into a weapon they use to inflict punishment on those who do not toe their line. It is punishment of the kind that would be considered cruel and unusual, were it meted by a bona fide judge, not on a whim, but a judge that held a perfectly legal hearing, observing due process in a legitimate court of law.

One article came under the title: “Democratic Deputy Chair Meets With Far-Left UK Leader Accused of Anti-Semitism,” written by Erielle Davidson, and published on July 3, 2019 in The Federalist. The other article came under the title: “Keith Ellison Embraces Antisemitic UK Labour Leader Jeremy Corbyn,” written by Ariel Behar, and published on July 4, 2019 in the Jewish online magazine Algemeiner.

In both cases, the writers used as springboard the fact that the American Keith Ellison met with the British Jeremy Corbyn, to unleash an attack on the British Labour Party, which is led by Corbyn, and then turn their attention to the situation in America where Ellison is Democratic National Committee Deputy Chairman. Here is what has galled Erielle Davidson:

“Just a few days ago, 2020 Democrat presidential contender Sen. Corey Booker announced at a prayer breakfast that he would be willing to meet with known bigot Louis Farrakhan. It was a disturbing statement, given Farrakhan's anti-Semitic rhetoric has been circulating within the media following the discovery of his connections to the left-wing Women's March”.

And here is what has both galled and elated Ariel Behar:

“In 2010, Ellison promised that Israel's influence on American foreign policy would change once more Muslims got involved in politics. He was also forced to denounce Louis Farrakhan, a fervent Jew-hater, despite the fact that he met privately with him in 2016. Ellison had said that his ties to the Nation of Islam and Farrakhan ended in the early 1990s”.

Handled by these two writers at this time, the discussion was confined to the situation in Britain and the United States, where they say that the business of peddling anti-Semitism has moved from the outliers to those in the mainstream of political life. You'll find that writing about that subject in this style, is different from what the Jewish pundits used to write only a few years ago; even a few months ago.

That was a time when the Jewish pundits used to discuss the manifestation of anti-Semitism as a global phenomenon. They used to attribute it to a chronic disease that's endemic to the entire human race. For this reason, the pundits used to aggressively demand that the governments of major countries throughout the world intervene and do all that they can to combat and cure the disease of anti-Semitism till they put an end to it before it leads to another holocaust.

It took time, but the Jews learned the hard way that to accuse all of humanity of being diseased so that they can exonerate themselves for doggedly justifying the horrendous criminal behavior of Israel –– was not a smart idea. And so, they changed their approach. As seen in the two articles, they confined their attacks onto a small number of people and made no demand for any government to intervene on their behalf.

What the Jews are doing now, in compliance with their new approach, is express a low-level whine, which they hope will achieve two goals. First, they expect to motivate what they see as people of goodwill to get engaged and intervene on their behalf. Second, they expect to shame what they call the peddlers of anti-Semitic tropes, thus force them to cease and desist.

But as long as the Jewish pundits use language such as this: “Ellison, a former Congressman, is no stranger to embracing bigotry and antisemitism,” and language such as this: “The metastasization of the once-pro-Israel Democratic Party into a UK Labor Party-esque outfit that routinely shills for Jew-haters” –– they will continue to be seen as plagued by a disease that was never cured since time immemorial. And they’ll wait even longer than they have been waiting for the messiah before humanity will approve of their demeanor.