If you live in an environment where debating all kinds
of issues, is a way of life for you and your friends, you get to learn a
debating method that comes in handy once in a while.
If it appears that your debating opponent does not
have a core system of values from where to defend his point of view, but relies
on the accumulation of talking points he learned by rote –– you activate that
debating method to point out the fallacy of his stance, or put an early end to
the debate.
What you do is grab onto one of the issues in which
your opponent appears to be the most vulnerable, and maneuver him to keep
pushing the point in one direction till he takes it to an absurd extreme where
his argument melts. He thus reveals the moral bankruptcy of his stance, and you
win this round of the debate.
Well then, suppose you are in a group that is locked
in a constant state of debate with another group. What would be a God-given
gift to your group that you'll savor like manna from the sky? Would you not
love to have someone join the other group, who is at the same time a reflection
of what the group is about, and a constant revelation of its extreme points of
view?
Would you not love it if, like a veritable joker, he
would take those points to the extreme without the need for you to maneuver him
there? Would you not like to have him there instead, whereas members of the
group have up to now been cautious enough to make their points with subtlety …
having learned the bitter lessons of their long sordid history?
Believe it or not, one such dude actually exists. His
name is Donald J. Trump who is such an embodiment of the Jewish moral
bankruptcy, he cannot open his mouth without sounding like the unvarnished voice
of the two-bit Jewish propagandists. Self-centered, selfish, amoral to the
core, reckless and shallow, he firmly believes he is the best thing that
happened to humanity in the same way that they firmly believe they were created
to make of humanity the best that it can be.
And because he is today standing as President of the
United States of America, many of the pundits that were right-wing moderates
until the recent past, have been colored by his presence, and were converted to
the absurd extreme almost overnight. You could see how extreme that was at the
start of the COVID-19 outbreak when they rushed to explain to the bewildered
American public that Israel and America were going to have a cure for the
pandemic in a week or maybe a day or maybe just an hour from now.
They also explained to the public that America's
democracy and Israel’s “za damacracy of za Shamir” will never, never do what
the Communists of China did, which was to ask people to lock themselves in
their homes to contain the disease and defeat it. But time has shown those
pundits to be as wild and wet as the wet markets of China from around where the
pandemic may have originated.
You can appreciate that when it comes to saving lives
by the hundreds of thousands, normal people do not stop to think if a move they
make is Left-wing or Right-wing, Communist or Capitalist, Oriental or Western.
They just do it; they save lives and ask questions later. But the clowning
pundits that spewed the nonsense at the start of the outbreak, did not wait to
see how things will develop before making fools of themselves to make Israel
sound like the perfect thing, and make America look like the privileged
protector of the perfect thing.
Had those freaks waited long enough, they would have
read the article that was written by Alyssa Ayres, showing how India, the
largest democracy in the world emulated China, the largest capitalist country
in the world –– and ordered the lockdown of its citizens for a time, thus saved
hundreds of thousands of lives that would have perished the way they did and
still do in America. And the freaks would have seen how in the end, America and
much of the so-called democracies ordered the lockdown of their own citizens
after all.
Alyssa Ayres's article came under the title:
“Coronavirus in an Informal India: Fighting Economy,” and the subtitle: “India
has so far prevented a major outbreak of the coronavirus, but the trade-off in
doing so has meant hardship for those in the vast informal economy.” It was
published on April 24, 2020 on the website of the Council on Foreign Relations.
After telling how difficult life has been for those who labor in India’s
informal economy, Alyssa Ayres reported the following:
“The lockdown has helped prevent the spread of
COVID-19. The country has reported a relatively low number of cases given its
enormous population––more than twenty-three thousand cases as of April 24. But
some in India have begun to ask whether the lockdown has come at too great a
cost to the economy”.
These are the armchair generals who –– like their
American counterparts –– have nothing intelligent to say before the crucial
decisions are taken, but then come up with smart Aleck questions after the
decisions are taken, and the event has run its course.