You're
driving on the highway and see someone hitchhike for a ride. You stop, pick him
up, and for the next ten minutes, have a normal conversation with him. Now you
see a road accident that's so serious, it has the driver of the car trapped
inside it.
You
stop to help but the hitchhiker that's with you, protests. You ask why you
should not help, and he says he knows of a man that's mistreating his children
in one of the towns out there, but saving this guy will not help the children.
You ask, what's the connection? Puzzled, the hitchhiker gives you a dirty look
and asks: Does it have to be a connection? You get out of the car anyway and so
does the hitchhiker. You pull the injured man out of his car, and take him into
yours. You drive away before the hitchhiker had the time to come on board.
Do
you think of this as an unlikely scenario? If you do, you're not alone because
many people would as well. But you know what my friend? That's how Clifford May
and his editor at the Washington Times reason … and this is how they also want
you to reason. Check them out yourself.
The
article that Clifford D. May wrote, came under a title (probably chosen by the
editor) that reads as follows: “Lifting US sanctions against Iran's regime
won't stop the terrorism or oppression,” and the subtitle: “Don't listen to the
liberal media's echo chamber.” It was published on March 31, 2020.
This
being the moment of truth; a time in which people are dying around the globe
because of a pandemic that's affecting every country, even those not under a
regime of sanctions, the Jews had the chance to show their humanity and
flunked. As well, the Americans were given the chance to show their
independence of the Jewish hypnotic curse and flunked.
In
fact, having spent years telling the Americans to go hard against Iran because
in so doing, life will be made miserable for the people of that country,
forcing them to rise in revolt against the regime of the ayatollahs––Clifford
May has changed his tune. He is now saying, go hard against Iran because when
you do that, you'll punish the ayatollahs without affecting the welfare of the
Iranian people.
You
can see how Clifford May juggles these two contradictory ideas in his article.
He speaks of sanctions against the regime as if it were a mythical something
that's housing ayatollahs he used to describe as being blessed with hundreds of
billions of stolen dollars, and living well despite the sanctions. So now that
the debate has changed, he tries to give the impression that lifting the
sanctions against the regime will help the ayatollahs who were never affected
by the sanctions to begin with.
In
addition, Clifford May goes on to say that lifting the sanctions will
not help the people of Iran who will continue to die as a result of the
shortages in medicine and medical equipment; a situation he avoids saying is
caused by the maximum pressure campaign that America maintains against Iran.
Clifford
May rationalizes that jumble of contradictory thoughts by quoting Mike Pompeo
who said the following: “There is no sanction on medicines going to Iran, there
is no sanction on humanitarian assistance going into that country. They've got
a terrible problem there and we want that humanitarian, medical assistance to
get to the people of Iran”.
Even
if this were true, the fact that the Jews want to prevent the Iranians from
selling their oil to raise the money to pay for the desperately needed medicine
and medical equipment, tells you that Pompeo and his Jewish masters are acting
like the phony firefighter that starts a fire and prevents the real
firefighters from reaching the site in an effort to put out the fire.
Clifford
May has then decided it was time to muddy the conversation, a trick that the
Jews routinely pull by attacking someone. What May did this time was to talk
about what the “liberal” echo chamber has been echoing. He complained about the
New York Times urging that the International Monetary Fund grant $5 billion in
emergency funding to Iran, and editorializing that, “Demonstrating compassion
in times of crisis is good foreign policy”.
Clifford
May has also complained about the Washington Post opining that, “President
Trump and Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei should end their war against each other,”
about which May mocked the publication in this manner: “Who knew that 'Death to
America' has really meant death to Donald”.
Well
then, if –– like Clifford May says –– death to America means death to America
and not death to Donald, it must be that in the eyes of the same Clifford May,
and the eyes of the right-wing echo chamber of America, depriving Iran of money
to feed its people and cure the sick, means––exactly what it says––depriving
the people of Iran, and not the ayatollahs or the regime.
This
is the moment of truth, America. The world came to help you when you needed
help. Will you continue to take that help with one hand while killing Iran with
the other?