Sunday, July 19, 2020

America is the Gun, Human Rights the Bullets

What do you do if––like the Jews of Israel and America––you are the only entity in the world that wants to revive and normalize colonialism so as to work on being the new colonial master, and be accepted as such?

Well, the first thing you do is find a muscular sucker that is willing to listen to you. This done, you educate him on the new theory that will turn him into the most accomplished genius the universe has known, provided he proves to have fully learned the lesson and has put it into practice. You then turn that sucker into a weapon such as a gun, and use Human Rights like bullets, which you fire at those who stand in your way, trying to stop you from implement your grand designs.

What the new theory says in a nutshell, is that there are two kinds of human abuses of human beings. There is the traditional colonial regime in which an entity exploits the subjects of another entity. And there is the authoritarian regime in which the governing authority enforces strict discipline on its own people. Of the two regimes, the new theory prefers the first, because it represents the familiar colonial system that has served humanity well according to the theory's adherents. As to the disciplinarian regime, it is a phenomenon that must be fought and defeated, say the Jews, because it stands in opposition to colonialism.

This is what the Jews had in mind when three decades ago, they saw the opportunity open to them for turning America into the weapon they could use to disrupt the normal development of the Middle Eastern nations. This suited them just right because it allowed them to continue their colonial hold on Palestine and normalize it. It also gave them the opportunity to expand their colonial reach into other neighboring nations, maybe even go beyond the immediate neighborhood.

Having established the principle that one people colonizing another is a good thing, the Jews made the occupation of Palestine so acceptable to the Americans, the latter dropped out of the UN Human Rights Council because it would not join in the madness of congratulating Israel for a job well done. And then, as if manna had dropped on the Jews from the sky, Syria was attacked by terrorists from around the globe. This gave the Jews the opportunity to falsely assert that President Assad was killing his own people; a signal for the Americans to intervene in the affairs of Syria, and work to implement the Jewish grand designs for the region.

But because what is good for the goose is good for the gander, there appeared to be a problem with White cops in America killing their own Black citizens, which they did by firing multiple bullets into their backs, and suffocating them using barbaric choke holds they learned in Israel. How do you treat a situation like this when the theory says that if you mistreat your own people, someone must intervene to stop you? Who will the Jews call upon to intervene and stop America from murdering its own Black citizens?

This being a conundrum, the Jews scratched their heads and came up with what passes for creativity in Jewish culture: They copied an example that was created somewhere else, and made it their own. Here is the example: It happened during the time when South Africa was run by a system of apartheid, that the country was having economic difficulties, and they badly needed a foreign infusion of money. Because South Africa would not accept investment from non-Whites at the time, and because no White people were willing to invest in South Africa, the apartheid regime came up with a solution. It called the Japanese “honorary Whites” and invited them to come to South Africa with bags full of money.

Well, the Jews worked on something like that––actually in reverse––to help America with its racist policy of discriminating against its Black citizens and murdering them in broad daylight and getting away with the crimes over and over. What the Jews did was call on the mob of Jewish pundits to split America into the good people that have privileges and the bad people that have none. The pundits made it so that all those who stand on Israel's side are good, and those who stand on the other side are bad.

But because being bad does not strip someone of their citizenship, the Jews invented the system of canceling the people (mostly Blacks) who spoke their mind, uninhibited by any sort of hangup, the way that Louis Farrakhan expresses himself. This had the effect of turning the canceled Americans into honorary aliens, liable to be treated as colonial subjects in their own country, and deprived of protection under the Constitution.

This is the background that has led the Jews to seek institutionalizing the gains they have achieved up to now. To that end, they ordered the American State Department to come up with a report that will lead to laws meant to bind future generations of Americans to continue serving the Judeo-Israeli causes, which can happen only by diminishing America and inflating Israel.

The name of the State Department's piece of work, came down as, “Report of the Commission on Unalienable Rights.” You can read it and see what the Jews are up to now, or you can read what Jimmy Quinn thinks about that report.

You'll find that Quinn's article came under the title: “What does Pompeo's Commission on Unalienable Rights Mean for U.S. Foreign Policy?” published on July 17, 2020 in National Review Online.