Do you know why Jews avoid
getting involved in a serious debate with an opposing interlocutor that is not
one of their own pretending to represent the other side of the argument? Because
they know they are liable to do more than shoot themselves in the foot. They
could very well shoot themselves in the head.
Well, let me tell you this, it
happened that this time, Clifford May did not even need an interlocutor to
shoot himself. It is that the subject matter he tackled so agitated him, he did
it to himself all by himself. The occasion being a momentous one, he did not
shoot his foot; he shot his head.
To better understand what
Clifford May did, we need to recall the Jewish strategy they often use to have
it both ways without appearing to have it both ways. What they do is advance
two parallel arguments, but do so separately because, when brought together the
arguments would nullify each other.
For example, today the Jews
might advance the argument that says God gave them the Land of Palestine, and
there is no way they'll relinquish an inch of it to the Palestinians. And
tomorrow they would say, they are prepared to negotiate a compromise with the
Palestinians except that the Palestinians refuse to compromise; blame the
failure on the Palestinians. And very few people would bother to juxtapose the
two statements, which would have made them realize that the Jews pulled a fast
one on them.
And that's not the end of the
Jewish trick. What these people would do next is instruct the Americans to
pressure the Arab countries to pressure the Palestinians to say what they would
give up if the Jews would give back A and B to them. Skeptical but desirous to
see something good come out of this, the Palestinians say they would give up C
and D. And so, the Jews––that have their American equipped military everywhere
in Palestine––help themselves with C and D, and blame their action on the Americans.
They now look at the Palestinians in the face, not to say here are the A and B they
promised them, but to ask: what else will you give us if you really want A and
B?
All of that takes time to
unfold, and the back-and-forth arguments that led to that outcome would get so
tempered, reconstructing them at a later date can never reproduce the sense of
horror they were hiding between the lines. But now, Clifford D. May––who did
not realize what he was doing––has spilled the beans for us, so to speak. He
did so in an article that came under the title: “Peter Beinart's one-state
solution for Israelis and Palestinians,” and the subtitle: “If it were taken
seriously, it could lead to a final solution.” The article was published on
July 14, 2020 in The Washington Times.
Look what Clifford May says
has always been the attitude of Jews regarding the Land of Palestine:
“Calling for one
state for Israelis and Palestinians is not a viable solution to this conflict.
It's a disaster in the making for Israelis, the Jewish people. The proposal
means the elimination of the very purpose of Zionism: the sovereignty in their
homeland that the Jewish people deserve. Jews would quickly become a minority
here, just as they were in Europe. Many of us have no interest in Beinart's
suggestion that we commit national suicide”.
And then, in the
same breath, Clifford May has added the following:
“Were Palestinian
leaders interested in developing support for a binational state of
Israel-Palestine, there are steps they could take to demonstrate its
feasibility. For example, they could support normalization. They could adopt a
more benign view of Jewish settlements in the West Bank”.
As can be seen, this is the
classic method by which to pull a con game. After saying there is absolutely no
way the Jews will accept the idea of a binational state, Clifford May suggests
otherwise to the Palestinians, and invites them to unilaterally take the steps
that would normalize the current situation. In fact, if the suggestion were to be
taken seriously by the Palestinians, the effect would be their acceptance to
permanently remain under Jewish occupation.
Clifford May is also asking
the Palestinians to forfeit their ownership of the land and properties confiscated
by the settlers, and tell their allies in the Arab countries and around the
world to stay away because everything is okay in Palestine. And he wants them
to do all this without even the promise that the Jews will say thank you. On
the contrary, after the Palestinians would have done their part, the Jews will
tell them: Now that you have recognized our ownership to the place, what the
hell are you still doing here?
And the Jews will scream in
the face of the Palestinians: We don't want aliens in our country. Get out of
here. Find an Arab country that will absorb you. Or go to America or Canada or
Australia or Germany or France. Or go to hell. Just get out of here.