Look at this headline:
Ilhan Omar
Calls For ‘Dismantling’ American Economy And Political System
What do you see in it that
stands out, dear reader?
You see the word 'Dismantling'
between quotation marks. This means the word was spoken by Ilhan Omar. But
then, the terms: American economy and political system, come right after that
... not in quotation marks. Does this mean Omar did not speak these words but
that the writer of the article or its editor added them? Or does it mean that
Omar spoke these words but not in the context of dismantling the American
economy or political system?
These questions acquire
significance when you read the article that came under that headline, and when
you watch the accompanying video. The article was written by Elle Reynolds, and
published on July 7, 2020 in the online magazine, The Federalist.
When you watch the video, you
encounter the journalistic crime and intellectual fraud that were committed by
the writer, as well as the attempt to cover them by the editor of the
Federalist ... which he (she) did instead of telling the writer to correct the
deliberate inaccuracies in her article. Indeed, what you'll see when you watch
the video is that Ilhan Omar did not say dismantle the economy or the political
system; she said, “dismantle the system of oppression where we find it”.
To add to her aesthetic crime
of attacking an innocent woman, and bear false witness to besmirch her
character, Elle Reynolds or the editor did what dogs do instinctively, which is
to go to their old poops or those of other dogs, and add more poops to them. In
keeping with this tradition, Reynolds reminded the readers of the stack of
journalistic crimes and intellectual frauds that were committed against Ilhan
Omar by Jewish members of the mob of pundits, and their Evangelical running
dogs.
Here is what Elle Reynolds has
compiled in her desperate attempt to harm Ilhan Omar:
“This also isn't Omar's first
time making extreme statements. In April 2019, she faced backlash over her
characterization of the September 11, 2011 terrorist attacks as 'some people
did something.' She has also been criticized for anti-Semitic sentiments,
including a tweet in 2012 that said 'Israel has hypnotized the world, may Allah
awaken the people and help them see the evil doings of Israel.' Additionally,
Omar has faced criticism for refusing to support a bill condemning the Armenian
Genocide”.
Reynolds has leveled three
accusations against Ilhan Omar. She must believe they are consequential, and
will most certainly wound Ilhan Omar so badly, the American legislator will
never recover. And when this will become apparent, Reynolds believes that the
Jewish leaders she is trying to impress, will sleep well tonight. And when they
wake up in the morning, they will blow her kisses and a few dollars. Well then,
let's look at the accusations beginning with the last one:
In advanced democratic
regimes, legislators weigh the available evidence, consider the consequences of
voting one way or the other on a host of related and unrelated issues, and then
vote their conscience. By contrast, in primitive dog-like regimes, a small
group comes up with an idea. It tells everyone how to vote, and they all vote
as instructed. America used to be advanced. Then the Jews came-in and turned it
into dog-like and primitive. Later, Ilhan Omar and like-minded colleagues
came-in and began to restore America's honor. So now you know why Elle Reynolds
is doing more than huffing and puffing for Omar refusing to support the bill on
the Armenian genocide … she is barking furiously to express her disappointment.
As to Omar's tweet about
Israel hypnotizing the world, Elle Reynolds may protest that she is not of the
world, and we'll accept her assertion without question. But if she is not of
the world, can she explain how it is that she got so hypnotized, she is barking
a nonsensical language that is out of the Jewish playbook?
Finally, we look at Omar's
mention of the 9/11 thing that flared like a flash in the pan, and died when
people realized how artificial and trivial the uproar had been. In fact, it has
been a while since Omar spoke those words, and no one has bothered to explain
why it is that what she said was wrong. It is as if what happened was clear to
everyone, and that everyone saw the same thing. But the reality is that no one
knows what the heck the fuss was all about.
The truth is that this was an
artificial reaction trying to mimic a quirk you see recur differently in
different cultures. For example, devout Muslims would not start a conversation
before praising Allah. Some Christians would not eat before saying grace. A
journalist would not quiz a politician about the predicted high level of
casualties without first stating that he hopes the prediction will prove wrong.
And so the Jews came up with
the idea that today, next century, next millennium and forever, everyone that
intends to mention 9/11, must first curse the Arabs, shed a tear for the
Americans or do both … and then proceed to talk about the thing that’s
sometimes referred to as 9/11.
Because Ilhan Omar omitted
this part of the corny ritual, which the Jews have been trying in vain to force
into the American culture, the Jewish propaganda machine raised a stink.
But in the same way that the
abuse of the word “Holocaust” trivialized the thing, repeated mention of the
9/11 tragedy is slowing debasing the event.