Before there was the digital world in which we live today where everything that happens, does happen because it begins as 1 or 0, there was the analog world where everything that happened, did happen because it was made to look more or less like something else.
Whereas
hi-tech moved us from the compromises of the analog world to the either/or rigidity
of the digital world, the new politics of the eternally ambiguous, has moved America
to the binary “you’re with us or you’re against us” world which depends on the
direction from where the wind blows on a given day.
This
says a great deal about the general state of human logic. In fact, you’ll find
that early on, toddlers develop the ability to detect contradictions in what
they are told can and cannot be done. They sharpen this ability as they grow
older, and become increasingly critical of the contradictions they see in the
society where they are raised. When they are old enough to be on their own, and
must earn a living in an environment they view as made of layers of hypocrisy,
they adapt and become as hypocritical as everyone else, or they crack up under
the weight of the absurdities they can no longer handle. An increasing number
of people in America begin a mental descent that can reach serious depths.
Some
parents prepare their children to face a world of contradictions better than
others. For example, they would explain to their child that yes, Johnny can play
basketball because he is tall, but you will play soccer better because you are
short. The two sports are not exactly the same, but they are analogous in that
they have many elements in common. In fact, you’ll do some things better than
others, but they’ll do some things better than you. In the end, however, you
will all do more or less the same things, but do them to various degrees of
excellence.
It
was the infusion of the alien Judeo-Yiddish culture into the American way of
life that reduced the once rich tapestry of nuances that America used to enjoy
when it came to choosing between options. The alien culture transformed most
things in American life into a meager either/or choice, neither of which could satisfy
the American taste for a variety of colors and various shades of them.
This
reduction in American life is seen in the domestic politics that’s played out
in the American Congress and State Legislatures where the analog compromises of
the past, have disappeared and were replaced with the “our way or the highway”
proposition offered by each political party to the other.
On
the international stage, you see a repetition of that same kind of abomination
in the sclerotic foreign diplomacy that the Jewish advisors have injected into
the State Department. You now see these same advisers try to force the alien
culture on a White House that was recently liberated from the clutches of a
madman. The Executive was turned over to a new administration that wants to bring
back the sanity of mature diplomacy; the kind that America used to practice in
the past. An example of the tug of war between sanity on one side and the
Judeo-Yiddish method on the other, is exhibited in the editorial that came
under the title: “Team Biden’s nuke-deal talks are positively absurd after
Iran’s latest deadly attack,” published on August 6, 2021 in The New York Post.
Whereas
mature diplomacy recognizes that when you have been in a state of virtual war
with a foe, but then decided to negotiate an end to the hostilities, you don’t
expect the foe to transform into an angel overnight and play everything your
way, failing which you tell him to take the highway. But that’s exactly what
the Jewish editors of the New York Post are advising Team Biden to do.
Whereas
America continues to pursue the policies that Iran considers hostile, and
whereas Iran continues to pursue the policies that America considers hostile,
the two have adopted the adult posture of continuing the negotiations that
should lead them to a modus vivendi for peaceful coexistence. This proved to be
a choice too mature and too civilized for the editors of the New York Post to
grasp and to embrace. It proved to be so high above their intellectual abilities
to appreciate, they thought of it as being an absurd posture. Here is how they
expressed that sentiment:
“Biden’s
insistence on resuming the nuclear agreement with Iran has entered the world of
the absurd: As his officials entertain talks with Tehran, they’ve been
coordinating with the UK, Romania and Israel to launch a retaliatory
response following what is believed to be an Iranian-backed strike on a ship”.
What
makes the situation even more bizarre is the fact that the ship that was
attacked at sea was Israeli, the very people who brag to their worldwide rank and
file — clowns like the editors of the Post — that Israel has been launching
thousands of air attacks on the Iranian positions in Syria. How does that
compare with a single attack (thought to be Iranian) on an Israeli ship?
This
is such an unreliable regime, say the Post editors, the ayatollahs want
guarantees that they will not once again enter into an agreement with America,
only to see another madman elected to the White House who will renege on the
deal yet again. This is proof of such bad faith on the part of the Iranians,
say the clowning editors of the Post, there is only one way to deal with Iran.
It is the following, they say:
“Here’s
a better idea than for Team Biden to continue to deal with thugs who can’t be
trusted: Don’t negotiate at all, but simply dictate the terms for the removal
of sanctions and leave it to Iran to comply. If Iran can’t first prove
that it will forswear nuclear weapons for good, it doesn’t deserve any of the
benefits a Biden deal will bestow”.
It is true what they say about the Jews who look in the mirror and see the full scope of their ugliness, then turn around and accuse others of what they see in themselves.