Cannot hide that Israel is America's deadly Enemy

Put two statements side by side and examine them. If you believe they are compatible, don't bother reading the rest of this presentation because you'll be wasting your time. But if you think they are contradictory and make no sense when used simultaneously, you'll be on your way to understanding the message of this presentation.

Here are the two statements: First, everything that happens in this world, happens because America wants it to happen; and everything that doesn't happen, does not because America wants it not to happen. Second statement, the crazies who blame America for everything that happens in the world or does not, are deluded conspiracy theorists.

Here is the message of this presentation: either America is so important, it is responsible for the good and the bad things that happen in the world, or it is not that important, therefore not that responsible. What you cannot say, however, is that America is responsible for all the good things that happen in the world, but not responsible for the bad things … not even when it is proven to have been neglectful.

There is also a popular caveat that needs to be discarded. It is often used when there is irrefutable evidence that America was responsible for a bad thing that happened. The caveat asserts that America does not make mistakes, but a bad president might. If he is of the Right, he will be denounced by those on the Left. If he is of the Left, he will be denounced by those on the Right. But the truth is that nobody in the world is buying this line of reasoning. As to the Americans who use the caveat – be they of the Left or the Right – they are the ones deluding themselves.

The consequence of all this is that it was possible for various foreign entities – the Jews foremost among them – to exploit America, and have it play a role that serves not its people but the interests of the foreigners. What the self-appointed Jewish leaders did is revive the notion of America being “exceptional,” and linked it to the notion of the Jews being “favored.” Thus, America and Israel were destined by divine providence to fashion a Pax Americana, argued the Jewish leaders. The two countries were duty bound to implement the Pax, by force if necessary, on those who reject it, added the Jews.

Having thus created many enemies near and far, the scheme went horribly bad for America as demonstrated by the current events in the Middle East. And so, what was left for the agents of the entities to do, was to lament America's losses, and blame the whole thing on the current President. You can see how this is done in the article that came under the title: “How America got shut out of Syria,” written by Benny Avni, and published on December 21, 2016 in the New York Post.

Avni is shedding tears because he says that America will be “left out in the cold” when Russia, Turkey and Iran will cooperate to evacuate the civilians and the armed groups out of eastern Aleppo. What is ironic in his view is that something like this is happening despite the fact that Sunni Turkey is the sworn enemy of Shiite Iran.

Another irony he cannot stomach is that all this came about as a result of a Turkish soldier assassinating a Russian ambassador. The government in Turkey linked the assassin to a group whose leader lives in America, thus blamed the incident on America, says Avni. In addition, the Russian government followed suit, claiming that America was trying to sour the relation between Russia and Turkey.

All that is false, says Avni, enable to explain why neither America's “exceptionalism” nor the “favored” Jews could do something to foil the destructive roles played by Putin and Erdogan. Instead, he asserts that there is only one identifiable culprit in this saga, and he set out to describe him as follows:

“President Obama has decided to subcontract Syria to other powers. Losing friends and not influencing people is the price a superpower has to pay for a decade of refusing to be one … And even as it cedes geopolitical influence, the West remains a top bogeyman, fueled by not just Islamist propaganda but by Russian and Turkish lies. So even as our global power diminishes, Islamists will target our streets for bloodshed”.

Obama is the problem, he says, and things will keep getting worse even after he is gone because of what he has done, and what he has neglected to do. How far will the bad things go? As far as terrorists targeting America's streets for bloodshed, says Avni.

While pushing this conclusion, Avni describes the unfolding of a psychodrama that's played out between the two authoritarian leaders, Putin of Russia and Erdogan of Turkey. The latter is walking a tightrope, says Avni, which is why his followers are fed Anti-Western conspiracy theories to distract them from Putin's butchery.

The world is a stage, the play goes on and America is outside looking in. Standing near is the Jew who created the situation, whispering in America's ear: Never fear; the Jew is here. I'll fix everything for you in no time … just hand me the few dollars left in your pocket.

The Left and Right Family Feud of Zionists

In the civil war that has erupted between liberal Jews and the neocons who broke off from their movement, valuable information and ideas are often exchanged between the parties.

The sad part is that such information and ideas are not allowed to become raw material for use by non-Jewish historians. This must be reversed because such people need them to write unbiased, authentic and non-mutilated history. That's not what's happening in Europe, however, where non-Jews are thrown in jail for probing the history surrounding the Holocaust. It is not what's happening in North America either because the suppression of free speech on this continent has reached the point of ruining the lives and careers of the non-Jews who dare to dabble in Jewish history.

To see how dense the information and ideas are – hence how valuable they can be to non-Jewish historians – the reader may wish to consult an article that came under the title: “Liberal Zionism in the Age of Trump,” written by Omri Boehm and published on December 20, 2016 in the New York Times.

This article is an example of the skirmishes that erupt from time to time between the two Jewish factions. In this case, Boehm who is of the neocon stripes, uses the result of the latest developments on the American political scene, to tell the liberals that their days are numbered. To make his point, Boehm unpacks and parses many of the historical events that would be taboo to non-Jews. One glaring example comes out forcefully in the following condensed passage:

“Such alliances may be traced to 1941. In a letter to Nazi officials, drafted by Avraham Stern, a leading Zionist and member of Irgun and Lehi, Stern proposes to collaborate with Hitler on solving the Jewish question by achieving a Jewish free Europe … He suggests collaborating with the German's war effort and establish a Jewish state on a national and totalitarian basis, which will be bound by treaty with the German Reich”.

Now, my friend, think what a non-Jewish historian could do with the information contained in that passage. Think also of the numerous times that the Jewish pundits incited the ignoramuses in the American Congress, instructing and conditioning them to believe that 350 million contemporary Arabs are horrible people because decades ago, an Arab Mufti traveled to Germany and spoke with Hitler. Think of the consequences that flow from America's legislators drinking from this cup of Jewish evil and acting on it as if there was but one side to every story, the Jewish side.

Having done all that thinking, ask yourself why it is that the Jews insist on maintaining their monopoly on the information pertaining to their history. They use such information all the time to engage in family feuds but scream their heads off when a non-Jew uses the same information to explain the unfolding of history in a way that may not suit their narrative. Why do they do this?

Well, if you probe deeply into the subject, you'll come to a startling conclusion. You'll realize that the Jews – be they liberal or neocon – believe that the world was created to be the stage on which Jewish history is unfolding. They see their history as being the main plot telling the story of creation, and see everything else as the subplots that add sizzle to their narrative. Thus, in their eyes, the Old Testament is not where religion and history begin and end, it is where they begin; from where they continue to unfold to this day, and will unfold to the end of time.

Of course, the Old Testament is not written in the format that regular historians use to write regular history. But given that the Jews who call themselves historians, write stories as a continuation of the Old Testament, what they create never coincides with reality. Instead, they write in a style that is compatible with the format used by the Old Testament. The Jews do this so that their writing may be added to that Testament at some point in the future, and blend harmoniously with the existing stories.

Before this happens, however, the stories must be koshered into a vanilla state so that they appear to be the work of God. That's why you see the Jews rewrite the history of Anne Frank, for example, having removed the reality that she was betrayed by people who told the Nazis about her hideout.

And you can bet that the next thing they’ll do, is claim to have decreed that Donald Trump be President of the United States. They’ll try to own him like they believe they own everything else.

Palestinian Aid versus Israeli Aid

Let's pretend to play a little game. You go to a gambling casino, sit at a table and roll the dice. A guy comes along, sits next to you and does the same thing. You play for an hour and decide to quit because you've accumulated 1,000 dollars in gains, and you're happy with that. The neighbor decides to quit as well, having accumulated 2.533 million dollars in gains. That's 2,533 times as much as you did.

All of a sudden, that same guy gives you the surprise of your life. He stands up and starts shouting accusations at you – loud enough for all to hear. He says you do not deserve the money because you cheated, and tells the teller to refuse cashing your chips. The people around the table say they had their eyes on everyone, and they can tell that you did not cheat. If anything, it was the guy that's accusing you who conducted himself like a heel … being loud, agitated and disruptive at every moment.

Well then, what would you call that guy? Will it be unfair to call him an animal in human clothing? No, you don't believe it would be unfair to call him an animal. In fact, if you could think of a worse insult, you would throw it at him and not worry for a second. Well, my friend, let me assure you that the story you just read wasn't a far out fiction. In fact, you may even consider it a sanitized expression of a reality that's a lot more horrific than the fictional version.

Here is the actual story: The Jews who just got 38 billion American dollars for Israel, are pulling their hair out, banging their heads against the wall, beating their breasts and blowing their entrails out of their bellies hollering bloody murder because the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) received 25 million Canadian dollars, 20 million of which being earmarked to support education, health and social services for Palestinian refugees, and 5 million for the victims of the Syrian conflict. You do the math, and find that considering the amounts disbursed, and taking into account the reduced value of the Canadian dollar, Israel was given 2,533.33 dollars for every dollar that were given to the Palestinians.

The editors of the Pittsburgh Tribune carry that story in their publication as part of their continuing collaboration with a minuscule joint calling itself U.N. Watch. It is an outfit that rents a post office box in prestigious Switzerland to appear more important and worthier than it is. The outfit has dedicated itself to slandering all of humanity, something it does by relentlessly slandering the United Nations. Its excuse for doing this, is that Israel – like Rodney Dangerfield – don't get no respect at the United Nations. Its latest work, adopted by the editors of the Tribune, came under the title: “Palestinian 'aid'?” published on December 18, 2016.

Here is how the IQ of the folks at the U.N. Watch and that of the Pittsburgh Tribune combine to make sense of the situation as they perceive it at this time:

“It is beyond comprehension that Canada's government would reverse common sense and institute funding to a United Nations Palestinian relief agency … $20 million will support education, health and social services for Palestinian refugees … Canada's contribution is intended to help Palestinian refugees and to teach their children the universal values of tolerance and respect … Canada says the funding will be followed up by due diligence, robust oversight and reporting framework”.

If this is beyond their comprehension, you want to know what would be in their ability to comprehend. The only way to find out is to ask: What is it that Israel intends to do with 38 billion dollars? … That which they approve of. In fact, there is a written contract between the United Sates and Israel stipulating what the latter is obligated to do with the money. It is to buy the most lethal weapon systems ever devised by the American military-industrial complex.

These weapons are killing machines not meant to support education, health or social services for refugees ... Palestinians or otherwise. They are not meant to help Palestinian refugees or teach their children the universal values of tolerance and respect. Rather, these weapons are procured to kill Palestinian children; kill their mothers and kill everyone that may stick around to nurture them. That's the bitter truth, and it is the only thing these people comprehend.

If anyone out there still remains unconvinced these creatures are animals in human clothing, they must shed their doubt and be convinced.

Stop whistling past the Graveyard

Thinking of a nation's fortunes, you may establish a parallel between the good and bad times that the nation goes through on one hand, and the shifting seasons of the natural world on the other hand.

In fact, to reap maximum benefit from the changing seasons, the experienced farmer knows when to start planting what crop at the onset of the summer season, and when to harvest it. He also knows when to start planting what crop at the onset of the winter season, and when to harvest it. In a similar fashion, the wise ruler of a nation knows when the good times are here to take the initiative on some issues, and when the time has come to retrench and wait for better times.

The farmer that doesn't know, or knows but tries to outwit the natural order of things, will only meet with hardship when the time will come to harvest what he planted. In a similar fashion, the ruler of a nation that is incapable of sensing whether the time is here for his nation to take the initiative on some issues or to retrench from them, will only reap disappointments and heartache for his nation and his people.

Looking at the American scene, we see that the country was buoyed by the triumphs it scored during the Second World War. One unfortunate result was that its rulers went on to make mistakes which – it must be said – were in most part driven by misguided idealism. It is that the belief in a Domino Theory relating to the situation in Vietnam was a venture that turned into a colossal blunder. After that, America fell into a naïve state that allowed outside forces to push it into making the kind of mistakes that border on the criminal … if not there already.

One such venture has been America's involvement in the Middle East, later extended to encompass the entire Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. What is unusual about this involvement is that it came as a result of pressures put on the American rulers by the Jews who spent their entire 4,000 years of existence on this planet making life miserable for themselves and for those who befriended them.

To this day, there are still a number of non-Jewish Americans who accept the Jewish line, thus add their voices to that of the Jews who continue to scheme dragging America into ventures that may or may not benefit Israel, but will break the back of the American camel sooner or later. The country is close to that point already when you consider the burden that's placed on it due to the rise of other powers. Where things stand at this point, those powers have the ability to challenge and defeat America on several fronts, and they will not hesitate to confront the superpower should it stagger for a moment, even if it’s only a fleeting moment.

One such American is Michael O'Hanlon who wrote: “A Trump Strategy to End Syria's Nightmare,” an article that also came under the subtitle: “Trump wants to collaborate with Russia––which only works if Syria is broken up into autonomous zones.” It was published on December 15, 2016 in the Wall Street Journal.

Nowhere does O'Hanlon tell America to keep out of this venture, and let those who have a greater stake in the outcome handle the situation. Worse, to show how utterly out of touch he is with reality, he suggests involving Israel in the process of determining what should be done to heal Syria. This is like asking the rapist to take charge of the effort to rehabilitate his victims.

The second big mistake O'Hanlon made was that he failed to mention Libya at all. This was the place where interference by Europe's Jews created a hellish cauldron that forced America to enter the fray. But when the horror reached its apogee, all those involved in the crime withdrew, leaving the locals to clean up after them. The main local power to take charge was Egypt which teamed with legitimate Libyan leaders and worked to stabilize the country. America was told to lend a hand cleaning the Jewish horror it has created, and do no more than that.

America responded positively and for once, did it right. It did despite the fact that the Israeli media went frantic creating disinformation about the Egyptian navy preparing to invade the Libyan coastal cities. This is how Israel used to encourage the terrorist groups to send reinforcements to Libya, and how it created the confusion that led to false readings in America about Egypt's intentions.

Every indication is to the effect that Libya is now on its way to heal, and can serve as a model for fixing Syria. But you will not get this kind of advice from O'Hanlon or those who whistle past the graveyard not knowing that Jewish advice is the poison that will kill America if the camel's back is not broken before that.

How to leave the Arab World alone

Do you remember the Big Bang moment that was the genesis for the horror we're witnessing in the Levant, the Eastern Mediterranean and Europe at this time? Let me remind you of the event. It was a Prime Minister of Israel who went on American television and let out the war cry: “Zey know nossing about za damacracy of za Shamir”.

That was phase one of an elaborate scheme that the Jewish leaders put together to implement Pax Americana, even before the term had been invented. As to the next phase, the leaders let the Shamir cry simmer for a while to give the Jewish establishment enough time to work on phase two of the scheme. It consisted of assembling a team of writers, and commissioning them to write a book on so-called democracy. The stipulation was that the book be filled with arguments that appear to fit the various Arab situations.

The Jewish establishment looked for a fictitious author whose ringing name they could proudly attach to the book. The best they could find was the Russian illiterate that goes by the name Nathan Sharansky, so they made the book a Sharansky book. They made sure to release the thing when they had a team in Washington ready to whisper satanic wisdom of the 'damacracy' variety in the ear of George W. Bush.

Being as smart as a turkey, the W. devoured the content of the book, even traveled to Europe where he met the Sharansky thing. He then returned to Washington determined to force on the Arab World the Jewmocracy he learned all about. He gave the file to Dick Cheney whose office was full of monstrous Holocaust psychos equipped with hearts full of hate for anything relating to the human race. The monsters took the file and worked with joy tweaking a plan they had designed long ago to destroy Iraq. And that's why we're witnessing the horror that's unfolding today in the Levant, the Eastern Mediterranean and Europe.

But now that the civil wars in the Levant appear to be coming to an end, the destruction machine of the Jewish establishment is back at work paving the way to ultimately unleash a scheme that will do to the entire Arab World what was done to Iraq – that which metastasized to infect a good chunk of the Levant, and then bleed into Europe. You can get a sense what the disciples of Satan are preparing for the future when you read: “How to Support Democracy in the Arab World,” an article that was written by Elliott Abrams and published on December 13, 2016 on the website of the Council on Foreign Relations.

Can you imagine what a modern echo of the cry: “Zey know nossing about za damacracy of za Shamir,” might sound like? If you can't imagine, read the first sentence in the Abrams article. It is the echo of Shamir's cry, and it sounds like this: “When the Arab Spring began, supporters of democracy had hopes the region might turn a corner and move to democracy.” Abrams goes on to say that democracy did not happen despite the effort, so we must try again to make it happen. And he recommends how to do that.

But before he gets to the recommendations, he dishes out all the nonsense that poured out the pen of Jews and non-Jews over the decades with regard to the Arab World. This done, he makes his recommendations under three rubrics that boil down to the Sharansky Jewmocracy. They go like this: First, the central feature of U.S. democracy promotion should be pressure, public support and criticism by the president and the secretary of state. This was known in the past as W's “mouth-farting” exercise. Second, recognize that political parties are the essential building blocks of politics. He wants the Arabs to become brain dead zombies like the U.S. Congress. Third, adapt what you're doing to each situation. He means to say, be as smart as a turkey.

To close his presentation, Abrams does something that takes me back the memory lane nearly half a century. I was taking a course in film when the prof ran a clip to show the class how little it takes to persuade an audience that you're an expert on the subject you're treating. It was a preacher – I believe Oral Roberts – who linked his message to America with a message he had given in some African country. To make the thing sound convincing, he dropped an African word, making himself sound like a genius.

Elliott Abrams is doing the same thing, dropping an Arabic word. Here is what he wrote: “To address legitimacy issues … rely on law rather than 'wasta' (clout or connections) to determine citizens' relationships with their governments”.

The reality is that wasta is derived from the word wassat which means 'middle' in Arabic. A wasseet is an intermediary. If an employer is about to hire someone that has no employment history, he may ask the candidate if he has a 'wasta' which means a recommendation from an intermediary. That would be a letter of recommendation from a wasseet such as a doctor, banker, lawyer or notary. Years ago, an idiot translated that word as clout or connections; many like Abrams copied it and kept echoing it.

The practice became an issue in Egypt because those who move from the rural areas to the city looking for a job, but have no one to vouch for them, resent it. That's entirely understandable, but it has nothing to do with the existence of the rule of law or lack of it in the country – which is the erroneous interpretation that has been circulating for years.

As to the wasta determining the citizens' relationships with their governments; it's the first time I see this “connection of the dots.” It must be an Elliott Abrams delusion. No, this guy is no genius; he is a turkey.

The disastrous foreign Policy of Jewish America

Consider this cry: The war is over; let's wail and weep. Does this sound right to you? Of course not. It would take someone that sank deep into the pit of inhumanity to be like that. But the reality is that some people do express this sentiment. They openly mourn what they see as the end of the war in Syria.

Imagine the wars that happened during the Twentieth Century; from the First World War to the First Iraq War. Did it ever happen that someone expressed sorrow because the war ended? No, there is not one recorded instance to this effect in the history books or any book. So then, why is it happening now?

It is happening now because those who were dying were Arabs; and those who mourn the end of the civil war are Jews. They cheered at the start of the war five years ago, proclaiming their delight at seeing the Arabs kill each other; and they are sorry now to see the war come to an end.

One group expressing their sorrow is the editors of National Review Online (NRO). They are the same editors who ran articles by contributors cheering the start of the civil war. This time, the editors have decided to express their own sorrow at seeing the war come to an end. They did so in a piece that came under the title: “Obama's Disastrous Syria Policy.” It was published on December 15, 2016 in their online rag.

Of the many things that will shock a sane reader when going over the editorial, none is more shocking than the style of writing that was adopted. It is unique to this event because it was never used previously in any similar event. It has become common, however, among the Jewish writers and their non-Jewish disciples who tackle this subject at this time.

The most bizarre aspect of the style is that the editors blame the war on those who won it. That's because their side – which they call moderate rebels – lost the war to a side that's made of everyone they hate. That would be Bashar al-Assad, President of Syria; Vladimir Putin, President of Russia, and the Iranian Shia fighters.

The editors also blame the loss of the war on their own President, Barack Obama. In fact, this is how they start the discussion: “The fall of Aleppo demonstrates the cost of American inaction … the Obama administration yielded the military and strategic initiative to America's enemies.” Here you have characters that got together with their contributors in celebration of the start of the civil war, now lamenting that Obama did not seize the opportunity to get involved before “America's enemies” had the chance to do so.

What does that mean? Are they saying there are spoils of the war that America could have gotten, but let Russia and Iran get them instead? Most likely not. The fact is that Syria has no natural resources of any kind and they know it. What then, are the NRO editors talking about? Well, they lament the success of the enemies because “The results are now plain to see. The death toll in Syria approaches a half-million men, women and children”.

Okay. But what does that mean? Are they suggesting that America could have conducted a more surgical sort of war – killing enemies that mingled with civilians, using them as human shield – without killing the civilians? Apparently not, because the editors do not even tackle this subject at all. Instead, they return to their favorite whipping boy and use him like a punching bag once more.

Here is how they put it: “There was never an easy answer to the Syrian conflict, but it's indisputably clear that Obama made a series of mistakes. He failed to aggressively support potential allies early in the year”.

This is known as the “if only” argument. You use it when you discover that your presentation is going nowhere, and so you assert that the result would have been different had something been done long ago that someone neglected to do. Since the assertion cannot be verified, no one will prove you wrong and you win the argument.

Instead of ending the discussion here, they did the very Jewish thing of expressing pessimism at the future, and used that argument to unleash a savage attack on everyone: America's Obama, Russia's Putin, Syria's Assad and what have you.

If there is one lesson to be learned from all this, it is for America’s political elites to get it into their heads once and for all that to listen to Jewish advice is to drink from Satan's cup of poison.

Jewish Tyranny in Black and White

Mr. Erwin Chemerinsky who is dean of the law school at the University of California, Irvine, and Mr. Howard Gillman who is the chancellor of that institution, co-wrote an article that is not unusual in itself because it makes sense, but points to something that is unusual.

The article came under the title: “A Bill to Police Campus Speech” and the subtitle: “Senate legislation aimed at anti-Semitic speech runs afoul of the First Amendment.” It was published on December 15, 2016 in the Wall Street Journal. The reason why the two men wrote this article is that something happened that's totally baffling. Get this now – a White Catholic and a Black Evangelical came together in a conspiracy to pave the way for triggering the next anti-Jewish holocaust.

While reading the article, I could not help but visualize my old Jewish friend who used to throw his hands up in the air and shriek as loudly as he could the agonizing cry: “light up the oven.” That's what he did each time that the Jewish establishment tried to create a legal framework in North America similar to what the Jews were trying to do in early Twentieth Century Germany. They turned the nation against them, and turned the Nazi Party into an efficient killing machine that came after them.

It took time to get the complete story out of an old man who spoke with a heavy European accent, and had a poor command of the English language. But putting together the tidbits that came out of his mouth, it was possible to assemble the frightening picture of the Jewish mentality he was painting for us to see. In essence, he was conveying that the Jew is raised to grow up and be a tyrant.

He explained: Anywhere the Jew goes, he tries to team up with those in authority and urge them to impose him and his caprices on those below. In fact, the Jew will give an arm and a leg to be perceived as favored by the government because this will confirm he was also chosen by God.

Yes, my old friend did say the Jew considers that to be a one-armed, one-legged child of God is better than being a two-armed, two-legged ordinary mortal. That's because to be chosen means to have things given to him and done for him just for the asking.

All of that comes out vividly when you read the article. Chemerinsky and Gillman write: “the Senate passed, and by unanimous consent, the Anti-Semitism Awareness Act.” Here you have it, the Jewish establishment asked, and the American Senate consented without debate to a bill that will give the Jews special status at a time when kids on campus are raided by Jews who try to impose Holocaust lessons on them. All that takes place, while the shell-shocked kids are cocooning in “safe places” of their choosing because they want to be left alone to ponder how to make it through the day.

The bill was proposed by the White Catholic Democrat, Senator Bob Casey; and the Black Evangelical Republican, Senator Tim Scott. Neither appears to be a moron yet both succumbed to the bribes and the blackmail that come with the territory of being immersed in American politics.

They were able to convince their colleagues in the Senate to vote yes for the bill or disappear when the time came to give their consent so as to make it sound like the vote was bipartisan and unanimous, an event that happens only when serving the Jews, and never when serving Black, White or Colored Americans.

We used to have discussions on similar topics with my old friend years ago. He is no longer with us, but if he were, I can still picture him trying to explain as awkwardly as he used to, something to the effect that:

These people do not love the Jews. They pretend to love us but they are creating conditions in which enough people will be fed up with us. Gangs will form who will cull the Jews in gas chambers as if we were stricken with avian flu, and toss the Jews in incinerators as if we were stricken with swine flu.

I wonder if this is what Casey and Scott are praying for on this Hanukah/Christmas season.