Michael Herzog who used to be chief of staff in the Israeli
ministry of defense and Soner Cagaptay who is an analyst at an American think
tank got together and wrote an article published in the New York Times on June
20, 2012 under the title: “How America Can Help Its Friends Make Nice.” The
piece is just another request of the sort that Israel 's
mouthpieces make of America
on a regular basis after Israel
craps on the lawn of what used to be the pristine neighborhood of the Middle East but is now a vicinity that is hard to smell
due to the oversupply of Israeli fertilizers dumped on it with merciless
regularity. What is disheartening in this story is that after each dump, Israel runs to America and cries out for the
superpower to come pimp for it, thus reconcile it with its neighbors once again
which is what gives the cycle the chance to start all over again.
As you will notice, Israel 's
mouthpieces in America
have outdone themselves this time insofar as the magnitude of the absurd
arguments they are using to make their points. For, it is a well known fact
that despite the rhetoric about Israel
being an asset to America ,
that thing is now and has always been the killer albatross around America 's neck.
To wit, each time that America got into a war situation in the Middle East,
Israel tried to join the action but America told it to stay out lest it lose
the trust of the real nations in that part of the world. The truth is that America always had to choose between the Arabs
and Israel ,
and has chosen the Arabs each and every time. Far from being an asset, Israel is therefore a liability that is steadily
eroding America
in every field where the latter used to have a competitive advantage over old
adversaries and potential new ones.
With this in mind, look how the two authors make their
points this time around. They begin like this: “Turkish-Israeli dialogue on Syria could bolster Israel 's
interest in regime change and enlist Israel to generate American
support.” In other words, they are asking the American President to reconcile
the two foes because this will motivate Israel
to want a regime change in Syria .
When this happens, they anticipate that Israel will lobby the American
Congress which is something that the American President cannot do by himself –
they implicitly admit -- because the Congress is one of disgusting low life
traitors not of patriots. The authors of the article do not explicitly express
this last part but they expect the reader to understand what they mean. And
this prompts us to ask Herzog and Cagaptay: What does that mean in the final
analysis, guys? Apparently nothing more than the making of useless noise.
The two authors then go on to say this: “A normalized …
relationship would also open opportunities for … the Turks taking the … lead
and the Israelis providing ... assets.” But the truth is that Israel can do
nothing that America cannot do a thousand times better, and in fact is doing it
now by assisting Turkey where the latter asks for help. Thus, the authors go on
to argue their point this way: “Any Israeli contribution would, of course, have
to be invisible.” So why bother, you ask? And they respond: “This makes
Turkish-Israeli cooperation against Assad even more valuable, for it would
allow Israel to provide
untraceable assets to support Turkey 's
efforts...” What? What's that again? Are they writing these words for the whole
world to see how it is that America ,
Turkey and Israel can
conspire to do the things that must remain untraceable? Hey guys, let me give
you a little advice. Go find a four year-old baby, sit with her and she will
tell you that your logic is full of holes because everyone interested in this
matter will – as a result of your writings -- know what you are up to whether
or not you succeed at doing what you hope to do. And after you get this lesson
from the mouth of a baby, leave the management of the world to grownups and go
play with toys in your rooms. The world has had enough of you, kids; it has had
it up to here and cannot take it anymore. Enough is enough.
This tragically hilarious request, my friends, does not come
out of nowhere. It comes on the heels of something that took place in Israel not long
ago. In fact, two things happened there earlier this month that shed more light
on the subject. The first that happened was the release of a report criticizing
the government, especially its prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, for the way
that an assault was conducted on a Turkish relief ship taking humanitarian
supplies to the Gaza
strip. The second that happened was that the Israeli parliament took up the
issue of what they call the Armenian genocide – supposedly one that was carried
out by the Turks against the Armenian people. To understand the significance
and ramification of the two occurrences happening at the same time in Israel , we need
a primer in the history and mentality that led to them.
When it comes to the use and the abuse of the word
Holocaust, the Jewish organizations have been sucking the driblets out of it the
same way that a parasitic leech sucks the goodness from its host to leave it an
empty shell for subsequent generations to look at the thing and wonder: What on
Earth happened here? Then the Jewish organizations trivialized the system of
governance known as democracy, thus rendering the expression “democratic
republic” assonant with the pejorative banana republic. After that, they
tackled the precept of “acting on principle and not expediency,” thus emptying
it of its noble content. Beyond that, they took on the expression “moral
imperative” and gave it the Midas touch in reverse, resulting in anything they
call a moral imperative transforming into rust instead of gold. And now, they
are applying their slimy talent to the task of mangling the word genocide because
it is here to be mangled and for no other reason. Will these people ever stop
being a pain in the side of humanity? Apparently not from what we see the two
authors try to accomplish.
Actually, the Jewish organizations began to work on the word
genocide the moment that they started to milk the Holocaust. Loath to equate
the suffering of the Jews with that of any other people, they called everyone's
holocaust not a Holocaust but a genocide in order to set the Jewish experience
apart from all the others. The intent all along had been to make the Jewish
experience a unique event that is separate from and never equal to the others.
In the meantime, they had a number of countries outlaw or try to outlaw the
denial of the Jewish Holocaust. They did not get too far with this project but
they remained undeterred and went on to work on making some countries recognize
the Armenian tragedy as being genocide. They worked to make the European
parliaments outlaw its denial, justifying their effort as being a moral imperative
necessitated by the seriousness of the subject matter. These were high minded
words but for reasons that will soon become clear, nobody in their right mind
believed that the Jewish leaders were motivated by noble sentiments.
It is that something was glaring to the people who devoted
time and the mental energy to analyze the subject. In the final analysis they
asked the obvious question: Why is it that the Jewish organizations are urging
the American Congress and the European parliaments to take up the subject of
the Armenian tragedy when they never urged Israel to do the same? This
situation alone gave away the reality that the Jewish organizations will use
anything and everything as a weapon to engage in the parasitic exercise of
getting something for nothing. Their problem has always been that they cannot
make a product that has a high enough value they can barter against the goods
and services they need to live on. Thus, they developed other means by which to
acquire the necessities of life without having to pay for them.
For one thing, they raided their productive neighbors and
robbed them blind, or they promised not to raid them if the latter would pay a
ransom on a regular basis. This method of making a living (blackmail as it is
called) became so ingrained in their mores, it morphed into the culture and the
religion by which they are identified. In fact, this is what their bible --
known as the Old Testament -- is all about as you will find when you read this
book of horror from cover to cover. To you and me it cannot be a book of
religion but one of endless terror. Yet to them, it is a book of prayer and
religious meditation.
And where they cannot in modern times raid their neighbors,
they have developed a satanic method which happens to work some of the time but
not always. What they do is demonize someone they call the enemy of the day at
the same time as they designate another someone to be the sucker of the day.
This done, they incite the sucker to go fight the enemy in the name of a noble
cause, the narrative of which they tailor-make on the spot to suit the moment
and suit the times to which it is related.
Of course, it would be in their nature to deny that they are
urging someone -- be it the American Congress or the European parliaments -- to
consider the subject of genocide, including what they call the Armenian
genocide, as a ploy to punish Turkey, a country they have ceased to like until
further notice which is probably now that they need Turkey again. And when the
time will come – if America
gets them to make nice -- they will deny they were then or they are now
blackmailing a country they intend to blackmail and ask for a ransom at some
point in the future. But this can still happen, believe it or not, whether or
not America
will succeed at getting the two foes to kiss and make up.
But after the denial is made and has been noted by everyone,
the Jewish organizations will take advantage of the opportunities opened to
them and will – one way or the other – collect on the windfall that will result
from the confusion they have created. In consequence of this, it is logical to
expect that these people will continue to incite America
and the Europeans to keep Turkey
in the cross-hairs of the Armenian genocide at the same time as they seek to
convince the world they are doing what they are doing driven by a moral
imperative and nothing else. But as always, nobody in their right mind will
believe them because the world has had it up to here with them, having been
saturated with their lies as much as the Middle East
has been saturated with their naturally produced fertilizers.
Nevertheless, in planning for and in setting up that tangled
operation, they did what they always do which is to overplay their hand. In
this regard, they pushed the American Congress and the European legislatures
past the limit of endurance, a situation that resulted in the scheme they were
working on to begin the process of unraveling. It is that they failed in the
end to get those legislatures to do anything that would punish or blackmail the
Turkish nation. And so the Jewish organizations found themselves with no
alternative but to get the Israeli legislature to take up the subject of the
Armenian genocide and process it in Israel as a way to insult the
Turkish people and poke their leaders in the eye. As if this were not enough
they, in the meantime, were preparing the arguments they would take to the
American President asking him to help mend the old friendship. Can you think of
something more Jewish or more ludicrous than this?
Now we ask ourselves: What is the significance of the
Israeli parliament taking up the subject of the Armenian genocide at the same
time that a report criticizing the government for a botched military operation
was released? And what would be the ramification of such a doubleheader? Well,
to develop a proper perspective, we first need to know that Turkey had asked Israel
for an apology to go to the nation, and compensation to go to the families of
the Turkish citizens who were killed by Israeli troops on the ship that was
taking supplies to Gaza .
So far the government of Israel has refused to apologize, a
stance that resulted in the relationship between the two countries coming to
the frozen state where it is today. This development cut off all manners of
communication between the two capitals, a happening that did not affect Turkey one iota but had the effect of kicking Israel in the
teeth. To understand this part, we must realize that Israel
had only Turkey
as a true friend in the region. It lost it not because of a dispute that can be
settled through negotiations but because Israel
murdered the children of its old friend in cold blood because they were taking
humanitarian supplies to someone in distress; someone pushed into a deplorable
state of existence by none other than Israel . Thus, even if America
succeeds in getting the two sides to talk to each other, how could a Turkish
negotiator look an Israeli in the eye and be motivated to say something nice?
And so, it was reasoned – like say the authors of the
article -- that if Israel
apologized, negotiations could start again and things could get to normal once
more. What they do not say but everyone knows it is that Israel will once again have the opportunity to
use the weapon of the Armenian genocide to extract new concessions from Turkey . This is
what the two authors are aiming for even though they don't say so; it is
another occurrence attesting to the reality that the Jewish organizations will
do whatever it takes to engage in the parasitic exercise of getting something
for nothing. These people have not changed in thousands of years and they will
not change now. Let it be known that change for the better is something that
remains beyond the evolutionary capabilities of these people. They are frozen
in time and so they will remain till the end of time.
And so, if you define evil incarnate as being opportunistic
and/or hurtful while pretending to be altruistic and/or helpful, you must
accept the notion that these people have proven themselves to be evil incarnate
beyond any doubt. In fact, it looks like no one is left on this planet who does
not believe they are anything but that. However, because there must be an
exception to validate the rule, you will find an American Congress where the members
sell their honor and the honor of their country to get elected or re-elected
regardless as to who does the buying and who does the paying. Being who they
are, they remain incapable of distinguishing evil incarnate from a hole in
their anatomy, and so they continue to believe that the Jewish leaders are gods
that must be worshiped by them and by all Americans.
These would be the leaders who modified the American saying
that used to read: “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” into a locution
that now means: suck the life out of the American people, rob them of their
liberty and pursue all the things that can be hauled in return for nothing.