It took someone like the Jew of Israel, who went by the name
of Shamir, to go to America one fateful day and cry out: “zey know nossing
about za damacracy of za Shamir” for a trio like Cheney, Rove and the W to be
so impressed, they started to work on turning superpower America into
super-joke America, something they accomplished in less time than a human life
cycle. And while doing this, they became so impressed with their own work, they
fashioned a doctrine according to which they went to the land of “zey” and
tried to democratize the people there in the style of “za Chewish Shamir.”
Now, the disciples of that same Shamir are at it again
except that this time, they are more organized, have more resources and are in
possession of propaganda tools the likes of which Shamir could not have
dreamed. To be sure, Shamir and all the others of his generation were hardcore
Marxists whose understanding of democracy stemmed from the ideals of the
collective communes known as “kibbutz” in which they lived; those upon which
Israel was founded and whose so-called economy still operates to this day.
Totally ignorant of
the Alfred Smith saying: “All the ills of democracy can be cured by more
democracy,” the Shamir disciples are now trying to force upon America their new
and improved notion of Marxist doctrine as it relates to the ideas of democracy
and the concept of free speech. What these characters are saying is that all
the ills of democracy can be cured by bombing the instruments of free speech in
the lands where people speak their own minds with clarity instead of
articulating the nonsensical and obscure ambiguities of our North American
discourse.
And so they had
their people in Israel bomb
the offices of newspapers as well as the radio and television stations in Palestine and Lebanon
because they could do so using the jets, helicopters and precision bombs that
were procured from America 's
formidable arsenal. But where they could not do the bombing themselves despite
all that they were given, they urged the American Administration of the Cheney,
Rove and the W to do the bombing. One such moment came when they insisted that
the Arab TV network Aljazeera must be wiped off the face of the Earth.
Luckily, something
(probably the weather) prevented the mad trio from carrying out those Jewish
instructions, and Aljazeera lived to continue giving people around the world
the opportunity to express themselves freely; to speak their own mind with
clarity as opposed to articulating the nonsensical and obscure ambiguities of
the Jewish style discourses such as those which pollute the American
marketplace of ideas on a daily basis. And these would be the ideas that fall
on deaf ears when carried to the people in the Arab world by such instruments
as al-Horrah (America's latest answer to Aljazeera) because the people out
there know better than to be impressed by American voices modulated to spread
the Judeo-Israeli propaganda.
While the Arab world
is free of that kind of garbage, and while it is getting more free with each
passing day where the TV channels are proliferating, America sinks deeper into the
embrace of the Jewish propaganda machine that seeks to strangle its people
emotionally, morally and intellectually. But the narrative of human existence
is such that when things seem to reach their bleakest point, an irony pops into
existence and turns the whole situation upside down – or maybe right side up.
What is happening
now is that Aljazeera is buying a channel in America called Current TV owned by
former Vice President Al Gore and other partners. And the people at the WSJ-Fox
network of journalistic pornography are worked up about it. You can see this in
the column written by Gordon Crovitz, and published in the Journal on January
7, 2012. It comes under the title: “Inconvenient Truths About Al Jazeera.”
Crovitz has a litany
of instances which, he says, should cast doubt about the wisdom of Al Gore to
sell to the Aljazeera network. He points out that Aljazeera has two channels;
one that carries a neutral sort of programs in English, aimed at an
international audience. As to the other channel, it carries programs which have
a distinctly pro-Arab slant, he warns. And this is sacrilegious according to
the point of view he so aptly articulates. Well, my dear reader, I too have a
litany of instances that should cast doubt about the sanity of those who
oversee the editorial content of the Wall Street Journal and the Fox News
network.
Unlike Gordon
Crovitz, however, who gives not a single instance in English or in Arabic that
the ordinary reader can check, my list is right here on this website, and it is
written in English. If you can read these words, you can click on any of the
articles pertaining to the Journal from the 500 or so articles listed on the
right side of this page. Moreover, unlike Crovitz who relies on hearsay in that
he bases his argument on – so and so who said this, and so and so who said that
– I analyze the ideas of the authors themselves as they have stated them in their
own words. I do not rely on hearsay and do not ask my readers to trust me
blindly.
And guess what, my
friend, I read the Aljazeera website in English as you can too, and I watch
their broadcast in English and in Arabic. I see little difference between the
two but see a journalistic integrity that is infinitely more appealing than
what comes in the Wall Street Journal or the Fox News network.
And I have news for
you (not ladies of the night but ladies of the wee hours of the morning) who
speak louder with your legs and your thighs than your mouth. I grew up in the
Sixties and the Seventies when the boob tube first began to rely on the T&A
(tits and asses) to draw viewers and to retain them. It did not work then and
it is not working now.
Like someone put it
crudely the other day in the company of scholars: If she has to show flesh as
close as one inch from her pussy, she is one inch away from being a whore – and
never a journalist.