What kind of clowns are these who see travesty in everything
solemn, and see solemnity in everything frivolous? At a time when their country
is mired in matters concerning domestic spying and foreign intrigues, the
editors of the New York Times call a judicial travesty, a case of spying and
intrigues that was adjudicated in an open court in Egypt. They make this call
basing their opinion on the view that spying and intrigues do not happen.
Is it their shamelessness, their mental retardation or is it
both deficiencies that cause these people to see things in reverse? See them
upside down? What is it about them that makes them believe a court system like
theirs which repeatedly convicts the innocent and absolves the guilty – is
always right? And what is it about them which makes them see travesty in a
court that looks at characters who say their mandate is to interfere in the
affairs of Egypt – and convicts them of interfering in the affairs of Egypt?
Can these editors be serious? Are they normally trivial? Or
is it that they are always stupid? Downright stupid? You, my friend, will ask
yourself these questions when you read the editorial that was published in the
New York Times on June 15, 2013 under the title: “A Judicial Travesty in
Egypt.” It is natural for men who are very, very sick to rape little girls or
little boys and say they did it for love. And it looks just as normal for the
editors of the New York Times to see the testimony of their spies and their schemers
(given in court and outside of it) then write this: “The decision [of the
Egyptian court] sends a chilling message to the United States that has
committed to being Egypt's partner in establishing democratic institutions.”
To rape a child and claim to have committed an act of love
is a horrible crime. To rape people at gun point and call the victims paranoid
for stating the obvious is the work of psychos who are too dangerous to be left
out there roaming the streets. Yet this is what the editors of the New York
Times are doing. It is that members of the groups which committed the spying
and the intrigues in Egypt, as well as those in America who supported them
financially and logistically have spoken. Time after time, they wrote that
America must use its power and prestige to threaten Egypt with irreparable
damage if it did not let the rapists of its national sovereignty get back into
the country and resume the rape.
In case the editors of the Times missed reading that
mutilated logic of the criminally insane, they can read their own words which
are just as criminal and just as insane. Here is a sample of that: “Secretary
of State John Kerry has condemned the verdict but a much stronger American
response is needed. The verdict might also be cause for Washington to rethink
its relation with Egypt, whose transition is running aground. It is troubling
that Mr. Kerry approved giving Egypt its annual $1.3 billion despite its
failure to meet Congressionally mandated democracy standards.”
Now look at this other passage: “The court convicted them.
In doing so, it capitulated to the paranoid argument that the groups – which,
among other things, train poll workers and work on voter education – were
'foreign hands' out to destroy Egypt. Altogether, the groups receive far less
from foreign sources than the $ 1.3 billion the army receives annually from the
United States … the verdict is a travesty, and Mr. Morsi should pardon them.”
Educate the voters, they say? What do these psychotic
editorial animals believe the candidates are there for? To sit like potted
plants while foreigners teach the voters all about American style Jewmocracy?
What can a rapist teach its victims ye dumbbells of the Jewish propaganda
machine who are disguised as journalists? Are you asking the victims to learn
how to love being raped the way that you and the American Congress are allowing
the rape of America to take place day in and day out?
Now, if you want to know how someone as primitive, retarded
and demonic as the Jewish editors of the New York Times tell the American
government to blackmail a country, look how these characters have ended their
editorial: “Egypt's stability and its ability to build institutions, establish
sound economy and uphold the peace treaty with Israel are hugely important. The
United States needs to find a more effective way of getting that message
across.” They are threatening instability and destruction. This is an American
al-Qaeda headed by a Jewish UBL.
And you, gentlemen of the New York Times, you need to visit
a doctor specialized in mental health. I believe there is one near you who goes
by the name Kevorkian.