Sissies and Eunuchs Indulging Themselves

The Weekly Standard is the magazine where the American sissies who stray to the far Right of the political spectrum congregate and discuss ways by which to stroke the ego of the Israeli eunuchs whose natural places are both the extreme Left and the extreme Right of the spectrum – but never the middle of it.

You get to see a snapshot of the way that these people live their intellectual lives when you look at two articles that were published in the infamous magazine on July 19 and July 20 respectively of the year 2013. The first article was written by Michael Warren under the title: “131 House Members sign Dovish Letter on Iran” with a subtitle that says: “Including 18 Republicans.” The second article was written by Tom Gross under the title: “Was Israel's Latest 'Air' Attack on Syria from a Submarine?”

You don't have to be a genius to detect the relationship that exists between those two articles. It is that the sorority of American sissies and Israeli eunuchs was disappointed by the fact that a number of House Republicans joined the Democrats in taking a dovish attitude toward someone in the world – this time Iran. And so the members of the sorority decided the next day to ask the question they thought will make the Iranian leaders tremble. And you deduce that the relationship between the two events is that of a cause and its effect.

Speaking on behalf of the sorority, Michael Warren begins his article by reproducing in full the bipartisan letter that the House legislators sent to President Barack Obama. As you read it, you realize it is a perfectly normal letter, and you conclude it is one that was written by intelligent and responsible people expressing concern and appealing to an intelligent and responsible man.

But to badmouth this Congressional initiative – as rare as it is – Michael Warren does what the members of the sorority usually do in such cases. He sets in motion the incestuous relationship they have cultivated among themselves; that of quoting each other. Thus, he quotes John Bolton who said that the letter will allow the Tehran regime to buy time and “make progress on its nuclear weapons program.” He also quotes Sohrab Ahmari who wrote in the Wall Street Journal that the newly elected President of Iran, Mr. Hassan Rouhani “helped the regime evade Western scrutiny of its nuclear-weapons program.” And he quotes Reuel Marc Gerecht who wrote that “Rouhani has confessed that negotiations were designed to advance the nuclear program.”

And this is when you hear the bells ring because this is where you get hit with two important happenings. First, you notice that the two members of the sorority, Bolton and Ahmari make reference to the Iranian nuclear “weapons” program without saying from where they got this information. But when the third member, Gerecht addresses the same subject, he quotes Mr. Rouhani verbatim and speaks only of a nuclear program – not a nuclear weapons program. Conscious of the significance that exists in the distinction between these two sayings, Gerecht tries to take the edge out of it by characterizing the Rouhani saying as a “confession.” With this, he hopes that the readers will come to believe Rouhani had a guilty conscience.

And because there is a difference between having a civilian nuclear program and a military one, the sissies of the Weekly Standard ended the article in a manner that suggests the Iranians as a nation are guilty of something. They formulated their demagogic verbiage like this: “it will be interesting to see if the Obama policy moves along the lines of this letter or [will] increase the pressure on the regime to its nuclear weapons program.” This would be the “weapons” of their imagination – their very sick imagination.

And you can see how sickly these sissies are when you look at the article they wrote the next day. Suspecting that the American President will not fall in the trap they set for him, they now seek to convince the world that Israel can be worse than Iran (which is a good thing in their eyes) because they believe the Jews have the right to do what they say the Iranians aspire to do. In fact, they want the world and Iran to know that Israel has had a nuclear weapons program for 50 years. Furthermore, they go on to say that Israel can deliver those weapons to the Iranian homeland and destroy its nuclear program before the thing gets started. And this, my friend, is how the American sissies stroke the Israeli eunuch to make him feel like the big and stiff member of the Erectoid species he never was and can never be.

So then, we ask: How is it that Tom Gross achieves all that? And we see that he starts by setting up a typical Judeo-Israeli situation of ambiguous moral clarity. He writes: “it seems that the July 5 attack on a depot near Latakia, which has been attributed to Israel, came not from the air but from under the water.” He goes on to say: “[an] intriguing scenario was raised when the London Times reported that the attack was carried by missiles fired from submarines.” To add more ambiguity to the Judeo-Israeli sense of moral clarity, Gross quotes none other than Netanyahu who spoke “in line with Israel's policy of neither confirming nor denying such actions.”

Having thus established the ambiguously clear sense that Israel may or may not be a giant member of the supremely moral species of Erectoids, Tom Gross unleashes a verbal attack on Iran: “more alarming for Israel is that Iran is only weeks away from crossing the 'red line.'” Quoting Netanyahu, he asserts that “Iran is now 60 kilograms short of crossing this line,” and that Rouhani is “a wolf in sheep's clothing.” For which “In Israel, Rouhani is viewed as far more dangerous than Ahmadinejad ever was.”

This being the case, and given that “diplomats have concluded America is unwilling to stop Iran from going nuclear,” the giant Erectoid from the kingdom of Eunuchs must now unveil his secret weapons. For one thing, he has submarines armed with nuclear weapons patrolling the planet's oceans; he also has electromagnetic pulse (EMP) weapons, malicious computer codes he can introduce into critical infrastructure, and possibly has special forces he can launch remotely.

Now that the world can see how far the eunuch's erection can reach and how stiffly it can do so, Tom Gross warns: “It is still not too late for the Iranian regime to stand down or for the West to ratchet up sanctions to make them do so.” By this, he means to advise the Iranians to stop taking Viagra while advising all Westerners to double the doses they have been taking.

Certain that this is not going to happen, but still hungry to give Israel credit for it, he goes on to say: “If Iran does back down it may be the result of a realization that Israeli capacity to attack and stop them is far greater than might at first be apparent.”

No, it is no more apparent than the joke they used to tell in the old days about the newlywed who pulled the pants off the groom only to see a sign that says: “This is where it is supposed to be.”