John Bolton and Elliott Abrams are having a debate on this
day, August 21, 2013 on the pages of the Wall Street Journal. The Bolton
article comes under the title: “The U.S. Should Back the Army” and the
subtitle: “If the Muslim Brotherhood wins, say goodbye to the peace treaty with
Israel
and stability in Sinai.” The Elliott Abrams article comes under the title:
“Cutting Off Aid Honors American Values and Law” and the subtitle: “By
contravening U.S. Law, the Obama administration is sending a dangerous message
to Gen. Sisi.”
Make no mistake about it; both men are working for the
supremacy of Jews in world affairs, and for the glory of Israel . To them, America is but
the latest tool that the Jews are using to attain their goal. But there is a
difference in the approach that each of them is taking. Bolton who is older and
more attuned to the voices of the international community is now a more
cautious man, having had several brushes with international operators that did not
like his mentality and let him know it. What he wants to do is use American
power and prestige to protect Israel
without ruffling too many feathers. Abrams on the other hand, remains the
“young Turk” who would rape non-Jewish Americans into submission, and then use
American power and prestige thus gained to rape the world into submission.
To explain how that works, I have two introductions. The
first will serve to clarify not what goes on inside the head of John Bolton –
you will have to read his article to see that – but to clarify the situation in
the world; one that he sees but does not fully understand. As to the second
introduction, it clarifies what goes on inside the head of Elliott Abrams, a
man so full of it, it was said about him that if he were a restauranteur and
you walked into his restaurant to have a meal, he would cook you a shit pie.
And that's what he is doing now.
The following is the introduction to the John Bolton
article:
It was inevitable that the geopolitical landscape of the world
should change fundamentally around this time in history, that the wave of
change should start at the Far East where China and India are situated, and
that it should move westward to the Levant and to Africa – both the Northern
part of it and the sub-Sahara. The reason for the change is that a second
industrial revolution was starting to take place; the trouble being that its
nature and impact were misunderstood.
When in the decade of the 1950s breakthroughs were made in
solid state technology (the transistor) and in biology (the DNA's double
helix,) a new industrial revolution was in the offing. It took roots as
predicted, and gave rise to new industries that were collectively called the
second Industrial Revolution. This was the correct thing to do, but something
was neglected at first, and was later misunderstood. It was the fact that the
part of the world which did not participate in the first Industrial Revolution
was going to be the main beneficiary of the second revolution, and no one saw
the impact that this will have on the geopolitical landscape of the world.
In the meantime, the underdeveloped parts of the world as
they were called, were going to undergo the same tectonic shifts in terms of
social attitudes, culture, religion, philosophy and what have you as did the
European nations at the dawn of the first Industrial Revolution. The shifts
were not going to be exact replicas of what transpired in Europe ,
but the forces moving them would be the same. And lest we forget, it must be
said that Central and South America started to
undergo the same sort of shifts but having a smaller impact on the world than
the Afro-Asian block.
And when you have change of this magnitude coming to
millions of people at the same moment, you must expect that friction will occur
from time to time causing the rise of disputes that will be resolved violently
in some cases. Depending on the size and cohesion of the society, the violence
will be confined to local places or spill across international borders. They
will be limited in scale or will go out of control. This is what is happening
in the world today, it is what John Bolton sees, and you will get a sense of
his interpretation of what he sees when you read his article. I would pay
particular attention to the first paragraph where he describes a world that is
not evolving but one that is undergoing a catastrophic collapse.
And the following is the introduction to the Elliott Abrams
article:
Imagine you're a fly on the wall in a room where Benjamin
Netanyahu spends time. He is standing in front of a handful of followers
discussing something, and one of the attendees inquires as to what the American
reaction will be if the Israelis did this instead of that. Netanyahu looks him
in the eye and confidently advises: We do not worry about the Americans; we
know how to handle these people. Well, you now fly across the continents and
the oceans, and you land in America
where things are happening; some of which are moved and spun by the Jewish
lobby for the benefit of the Israelis – more specifically for Netanyahu's Likud
Party.
It so happens that you get into America at a time when sex scandals
fill the air. They involve mostly prominent Jewish personalities that
shamelessly seek to remain in power or seek to regain power. It all happens at
a time when an Israeli President was convicted of being a serial sexual
offender. As well, a prominent Jew is caught in Europe
running an international prostitution ring. As to America , it comes to light that the
American military is a place where male and female recruits are used by their
superiors as sex slaves no different from the monsters that kidnap children and
keep them as sex slaves in their basements for decades.
Thus, being the fly that heard Netanyahu say he knows how to
handle the Americans, you wonder how he will handle this situation. To find
out, you land on many walls – including one at AIPAC, the most involved of the
Jewish organizations working on behalf of Israel . You gather information from
all those places about something that will happen on a day when the President
of the United States
will be giving a news conference.
You go to that event, and despite all the sex scandals that
have been exploding in Israel, Europe and America, a Jewish plant masquerading
as journalist asks the President to comment about a bunch of kids in Egypt who
– more than two years ago – groped a girl. They did not rape her in hiding in
some basement but groped her in public in the heat and the mad moments of a
revolution. And yet, here is the question being asked of the American President
who responds to it instead of asking security to throw the planted animal out
of the conference. And the result is that the Jewish controlled media in America and elsewhere use the occasion to splash
the message in big headlines that sexual harassment is rampant in Egypt .
And in the same way that the incident at the press
conference was organized, Elliott Abrams and people like him get paid real
American dollars to organize all sorts of incidents and events that abuse the
media, the international encounters where America gets involved, and more
importantly what happens in the Congress with regard to the laws which are
passed in the middle of the night to serve Israel at the expense of America.
And one of these laws is mentioned in the article as Section
508 of the Foreign Assistance Act. To have it, they blackmailed an aging
senator who was up for reelection, and forced him to move it through the
Congress. Read the article and see how Abrams uses it to tie the hands of America