Whatever inspired Charles Krauthammer to write a column
under the title: “Obama's Inverted Nixon Doctrine: Anointing Iran,” published
on April 23, 2015 in National Review Online, he came close to showing that the
1960 film of Alfred Hitchcock “Psycho” is not such a far fetched story, after
all.
In the film, the character of Norman Bates confuses his own
identity with that of his mother whom he murdered ten years before and kept the
skeletal remains at the family motel – now his alone. The identity of the
mother takes over his own when he becomes sexually attracted to another woman
and so, he (she) kills that woman. The plot of the film can be thought of as a
metaphor approximating what usually happens with the elites of the Jewish
establishment.
For example, anyone that converts to Judaism is made to feel
and to act as if he (she) were a descendant of the ancient Hebrew tribes. To
believe they have a legitimate right to the land of Palestine ,
they pretend they have a spiritual attachment to the land … an attachment that
is stronger than what the Palestinians may feel for a place they have been
calling home since the beginning of time.
Moreover, to appease the humanitarian crowd that still
believes the Palestinians have more rights to Palestine than converted Jews
from Russia or Ethiopia, the Jewish establishment has adopted the argument of
the old colonial powers to the effect that “we are more advanced than they …
therefore we have more rights than they,” and so the Jews became a legitimate
colonial power … in their own sick minds.
But this also made them superior not only to the
Palestinians but to everyone else, including the Americans by whose largess
they live. For example, they peddled stories to the effect that upon arrival in
the land of milk and honey, a Russian Jeweler instantly became the best farmer
that the universe has known since before the Big Bang. This is how and why the
milk and the honey of Palestine
were transformed into the olive and the orange groves in the patches of land
where the Jewish Jeweler poked his finger into the ground.
As to the Jewish relationship with the scientists and
engineers of Germany and America ,
Volkswagen would not exist today were it not for the Israelis who made a
magnificent discovery about magnesium, the thing that saved the German company
from an assured death. And the Americans would not be having the success they
are having in Yemen and Pakistan were
it not for the Israelis who taught them how to build and use drones.
Now comes Charles Krauthammer who demonstrates that the
Jewish confusion of the identities does not end here. Writing about Iran , look what
he says in this passage: “a nightmare for the Western-oriented Arab states.”
The fact is that the Jews – even those who do not live in Israel – are
having those nightmares. These are not the fears of Arabs; peoples that never
suffered a pogrom, a holocaust or were “wiped” off the face of the Earth.
Later in the column, the author goes on to say the
following: “The [Iranian] regime's ultimate strategic purpose is to …
annihilate America 's
Middle Eastern allies. Which has those allies in an understandable panic.” No,
only Israel
is in a panic. But given that nobody gives a hoot about Israel 's fate
anymore, the Jewish establishment has adopted the Norman Bates syndrome in
“Psycho” of confusing Arab and Jewish identities. Thus, whatever jealousies,
pain or longing the Jews feel, they attribute them to the Arabs.
So you ask: from where might Krauthammer have acquired those
notions? And the possible answer is this: “The [Saudis] are resisting being
forced into Yemen negotiations with Iran, a country that is, in the words of
the Saudi ambassador to the U.S., 'part of the problem, not part of the
solution...’” But that's a far cry from Netanyahu saying: “We are about to
suffer a second holocaust.”
Seeing someone as being the problem rather than the solution
is not the same as seeing him being the agent of the next holocaust. To confuse
these two positions is to reveal serious psychological problems.