Published on April 28, 2015 under the title: “Why Is
Pakistan More Legitimate than Israel ?”
Dennis Prager's column sheds much needed light on the reasons why the American
culture came to be screwed up so badly under Jewish domination.
The simple truth is that these people do not know the
difference between what is legal and what is legitimate. Confusing the two
realities in their minds, and spilling that into the American culture, they
pushed the spiritual down to the level of the mundane while elevating the
pedestrian up to the level of the sublime.
The Jews have repeatedly demonstrated that they do not
understand the “legal” to be an artificial construct. It is invented when a
number of people get together in the name of society and decide to codify the
rules by which that society will be governed. These rules are normally
fashioned in such manner as to be compatible with the norms of the society that
spawned them. And this is why different societies have different rules ...
called laws. In fact, what is permitted in one society could be banned in
another. More than that, it happens that the same society reverses itself and
allows what used to be banned, or bans what used to be allowed.
Of course, a change of heart of this magnitude does not come
easily to human beings. This is why it happens at times like these, that some
people invoke what they term the “natural law.” They do so to give strength to
their voice as they call for the repeal or the amendment of the laws they say
have become incompatible with a society that is evolving.
Even though the term natural law has not gained the wide
acceptance it deserves, it carries imbedded in it a profound meaning. It stands
for the law that is arrived at by logic and by human instinct when the
artificial law that was put together by man has ceased to serve the purpose for
which it was invented. In other words, the natural law is the “legitimate” that
people look up to when they realize that the “legal” isn't working anymore.
This turn of events can, for example, lead to the
possibility of creating anew an artificial legal construct that justifies the
splitting of a country into two pieces to accommodate a Hindu and Muslim
populations no longer able to live together … and decided to divorce, so to
speak. This is what happened to the Indian Subcontinent when the local
inhabitants were given the choice of living in one or the other of the newly
formed jurisdictions: India
or Pakistan .
In addition to being legal, this artificial construct –
which was invented by the United Nation – can also be considered legitimate
because logic and the human instinct approve of it despite the fact that some
people suffered while the plan was being implemented.
By contrast, logic and the human instinct have objected to
an illegitimate artificial construct that was put together in circumstances
like those which created an Israel
out of a Palestine ,
even if the creation was ultimately given the force of law by none other than
the United Nations. That is because the Palestinians were not divorcing or
splitting the property they owned as a people. No, this was not happening.
What happened instead was that the property was split into
two pieces without asking the local population. One piece was given to the
Palestinians, and the other to a total stranger who made a mess of his life
antagonizing every property owner in the world that tried to shelter him and
nurture him … and ended up having nowhere else to go.
Furthermore, the moment that the stranger took occupancy of
what was never his in Palestine ;
he started to encroach on the little that was left for the Palestinians. And
this is where the rest of humanity felt the buyer's remorse, and looked to see
if what is legitimate trumps what was made legal. More and more, the people of
the world are coming to the idea that if they tolerated the legal status of Israel in the
past, they can no longer tolerate its legitimacy.
Sadly, no one has come up with a humane solution to a
situation that should never have existed in the first place. And so, it is up
to the Jews to do what they failed doing for nearly four thousand years, which
is to live like normal human beings. If not, they will continue to suffer what
they have suffered throughout their existence.