An effective tool in the hands of propaganda wonks is the
mutilation of history by truncation, and the Jews are the experts in the use of
this trick. They play it like a magician, and they score victories they do not
deserve before the absurdity of their game becomes apparent to the victims who
unfortunately find it almost impossible to clarify the situation and expose the
truth.
To see how this works in practice, we need to be aware that
a dispute which remains small and contained, or one that escalates to endanger
more than the original antagonists, has an absolute beginning and a number of
secondary ones; the latter being what causes the cycle of fits and starts in a
long running fight. To use their trick effectively, the propaganda wonks
truncate history by starting the narration at a secondary start; one that suits
them best – while avoiding the absolute beginning of the story.
For example, the disturbances that flared-up recently in
occupied Palestine can be thought of as having
started two weeks ago when the government of Israel allowed fanatic Jews to
desecrate a Muslim holy site known as Al-Aqsa Mosque. That act coincided with
Jewish demands that were floated in writing, both in Israel and abroad, to the effect
that the 48 year-old agreement which forbids the Jews from doing what they did
– must be scrapped.
That was a sure way to get the Palestinians to come out bare
handed and defend the site. When this happened, the Jewish soldiers of
occupation responded harshly, thus invited a more robust Palestinian response.
This being what the Jews wanted, the army of occupation escalated the battle to
a more savage level. And this is when the Jewish propaganda machine was put to
work making the Palestinians look like the aggressive civilians who started the
fight simply because they wanted to hurt the Israeli soldiers who had no choice
but to respond by cutting down the Palestinians with live bullets.
As can be seen, when the Jews play this sort of game – which
they do all the time, and start the narration at the point when the
Palestinians respond to Jewish provocations – an important element of the real
story gets lost. It is the answer to the following questions: Who started the
fight and why? The effect is that absent those answers, history researchers get
confused as to what has motivated each antagonist. This leaves the field wide
open for the propaganda wonks to make-up a story that paints the Palestinians
as the culprits, and ascribe to them the worst of motives.
One such propaganda wonk is Victor Davis Hanson. His latest
work came under the title: “Moral Equivalence in the Middle
East ,” published on October 20, 2015 in National Review Online. He
begins the article by mentioning Arab youth attacking Israelis without even
hinting that there might have been a reason for their behavior. In fact, he
does not mention Al-Aqsa Mosque – not once throughout the article.
This being the most convenient place from which to start his
narration, Hanson goes on to denigrate the Koran which is the Muslim prayer
book. He also criticizes the “Obama State Department” for condemning the use of
excessive force by Israeli soldiers. And he suggests that America should stop aiding the Palestinians who
receive half a billion dollars a year as opposed to the3 billions, or maybe 5
billions that go to Israel .
But there is something more important to Hanson and the
Jewish propaganda machine … and he wants to bring it out here and now. Having
called the Palestinians terrorists, he asks the question: “Why is the Obama
administration morally incapable of calling out Palestinian violence?” And he
says there are two reasons. One is that the Obama Middle East policies are in
shambles. That's bad, he says, but there is something that's far worse, which is
his second reason.
What he says in this regard is something he has been working
on for a long while. It is his description of what he calls the postmodern
culture into which America
is sliding. He does not like it one bit because it runs contrary to the precepts
upon which the Jewish culture stands. He does not come right out and say so,
but speaks of the “relativist assumptions about human nature” that are plaguing
Americans, leading them to believe that “the Westernized world is no longer
threatened in any existential fashion.”