First, a short message addressed to the Jews:
Hey, all of you Jewish pundits out there, get it through your thick skulls once and for all; nobody owes you anything – least of all America
that has already burned itself at both ends to give you the appearance of
normal human beings when in reality, you are nowhere near being of this class …
and most likely never will.
You have produced thousands upon thousands of articles and
video clips in which you insulted, put down and denigrated America, the country
that liberated you from the concentration camps of Europe; an affliction you
brought on yourselves, having been as obnoxious then as you are today.
Moreover, you have done much to hurt America at many levels even though
it took you in, fed you and gave you a special status to keep you protected
while you got back on your feet.
Second, what that message is about:
It is about an article of Bret Stephens that is typical of
the articles and video clips which continue to flood the cultural marketplace …
all pretending that America
exists for one reason only; to be of service to Israel … no one else and nothing
else. The article came under the title: “Iran 's Indecent Proposal” and the
subtitle: “Khamenei haggles over the price of American surrender.” It was
published on October 27, 2015 in the Wall Street Journal.
Six powers, including the United
States of America , were mandated by the World to
negotiate a nuclear deal with Iran ,
and this was done. But before the talks had begun and while they were
proceeding, the mob of Jewish pundits and their lackeys attacked the premise of
the negotiations, not knowing what they were talking about. When the
negotiations ended, and the details of the deal were published, the mob continued
attacking it and the people who negotiated it.
They also attacked America by going after its leaders, most
prominently President Barack Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry, urging
them both to scrap the deal altogether, and urging all others in Congress and
outside of it to put pressure on the Administration to scarp the deal. When
this did not happen, the Jews and their lackeys attacked the Iranians, accusing
them of cheating – if not now, then in the future, like they said – because
cheating is something that the Iranians do by force of habit.
Not only did Stephens attack the Iranians; he also attacked
virtually all of humanity saying this: “also, too inconvenient to the commodity
investors, second-tier banks, European multinationals and everyone else who
wants a piece of the Iranian market.” Having said this much about the human
race, he rides what's being said about computers: “garbage in, garbage out,”
and comes up with this piece of wisdom: “When you sign a garbage agreement, you
get a garbage outcome.”
With these words, Stephens sets the Jews apart from the
human race, and turns the Iran
nuclear deal into a bone of contention between them and humanity. This being a
demonstration of how the Jews have been doing themselves in throughout history,
Stephens is here showing us how and why the so-called Jewish wisdom has been
the toxic garbage that kept turning the Jewish existence into a garbage
existence. They can monopolize it all they want because no one sane misses it.
And true to form, he points to every little thing and every
big thing which the Iranians say and do, to argue that this is proof they have
bad intentions. In this regard, he points to the unhappiness expressed by the
Iranian Supreme Leader with regard to the reality that the Americans – such as
Bret Stephens – are adding links to “their chain of hostile enmity with the
Islamic Republic.” And while he and his likes have been pushing to scrap the
deal and renegotiate it, he squirms at the idea that the Supreme Leader is
doing the same thing, calling his words “renegotiation of the entire deal.” Go
figure.
Actually, there is someone that tried to figure this out
according to Stephens. They are the characters running an outfit called the
Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI). These people have analyzed every
piece of information they could get their hands on, and wrote a report which
Stephens discusses in some detail. Going over that, the reader comes up with
one question: Where's the beef, Bret?
In fact, there is nothing in the report that's so startling;
it prevents you from dismissing it as worthy of no more than being fodder for a
movie script in the genre of the old “Indecent Proposal.” Still, this is what
prompted Stephens to conclude: “He [Supreme Leader] wants to pocket the
concessions he has already gained and wheedled for a bit more.” You would think
Stephens is trying to buy a carpet from a Persian, or something. If he has this
kind of money, maybe he should try to buy the Brooklyn Bridge