Look what happened:
1. The late President Ronald Reagan worked hand in hand with
Osama Bin Laden to create a force of Mujahedin driven by an extreme form of
Islamic fanaticism. They were given the task of defeating the “godless” Soviet Union occupying Muslim Afghanistan at the time. Mission accomplished, the force called itself al-Qaeda,
turned against the America
that abandoned it, and executed the 9/11 tragedy.
2. The former President, George W. Bush listened without
question to the advice of a bunch of Holocaust psychos, and attacked Iraq even
though the psychos were known to be driven solely by the fanatic desire to get
back at humanity for allowing the Holocaust to happen, an event they say was
responsible for their relatives being gassed and incinerated.
3. The current President, Barack Obama bowed to French
pressure inspired by Jewish fanaticism, and participated in the attack on Libya under the
pretext of saving that country from itself … but failed to do so. In addition,
the attack resulted in large chunks of the country being grabbed by the Islamic
State known as (ISIL), an offshoot of Bin Laden's al-Qaeda.
Now this question: What does that say to anyone who has at
least the IQ of a monkey? It says that whenever America listens to the fanatic
voice of a Jew and does as he says, something extremely bad results. It is as
if America 's
intervention were the fuel that's poured on a brush fire, turning the thing
into a hellish inferno that ends up consuming the forest.
Those realities clarified, it may now take the IQ of a human
being to reason that the way to manage the current fires is to keep America at bay.
To extinguish them will take time and a great deal of coordinated effort among
many players. To make sure that such thing never happens again, will require
that everyone say to America it has a Jewish problem that needs fixing, and
then suggest a way to do it.
We can identify the specifics of the Jewish problem in America by
combing the article that came under the title: “Thanks to Obama, the terrorist
cancer is growing,” written by Marc A. Thiessen and published on May 23, 2016
in the Washington Post. The first thing we notice about the Jewish method of
advising how to solve a problem is that the Jews attack the person that's
trying to do just that.
In fact, Marc Thiessen did that … he did even worse than
that. Look at this passage: “White House noted that in Iraq 45 percent of the
populated area previously controlled by ISIL, and 20 percent in Syria have been
retaken … That's like a patient who ignored a cancer diagnosis, bragging that
he reduced the tumor – glossing over the fact that he let it metastasize. Had
he attacked the Islamic State early, he could have stopped it from spreading in
the first place”.
Well, let me tell you something Marc. Before you write
another thing, you'll need to get yourself a monkey that will teach you how to
write a logical piece. Do you realize what you just did? You accused Obama of
ignoring a problem in the same breath that you said 45 percent of the problem
in Iraq and 20 percent of it
in Syria
were resolved. That's an intolerable contradiction. If you still can't see
that, ask the monkey to explain it to you.
Moreover, you went on to lament that Obama could have done
what George W. Bush did when told that the Bin Laden cancer can be stopped if America invaded Iraq . Well, W. did that at an
earlier time, and look what the unintended consequences did to the Levant . In case you forgot my advice, Marc, you'll need
that monkey to keep reminding you that madness is defined as doing the same
thing and expecting a different result.
No wonder Thiessen has ended his presentation like this:
“When it came to terrorist networks, the George W. Bush administration had a
mantra: We're going to fight them over there so that we do not have to face
them here at home. Obama abandoned that mantra. And now the danger is getting
closer to home with each passing day.” And that, my friend, is a lie of
biblical dimensions.
The truth is that 9/11 happened under George W. Bush, not
Barack Obama. Later, many terror attacks were attempted under Obama but very
few succeeded. Most were stopped before they could cause any harm. For Thiessen
and those like him to start paving the way for the next president to revive the
Bush approach and return America
to a state of perpetual war is to engage in the criminal betrayal of their
country. They do it by inciting others to do what they cannot do themselves.