If you are a student of history interested in how the Jews
infiltrate a nation – such as America, for example – and manage to dismantle
its culture from within one brick at a time, and then remake the nation in
their image to serve them at the expense of the indigenous population, you
should mark May 19, 2016 as the day when abundant light was shed on the tricks
that the Jews are using to pull such feats in America, and have been using to
pull similar feats throughout time everywhere they went.
On that day, Reuel Marc Gerecht published an article that
came under the title: “Done Deal?” and the subtitle: “Barack Obama's disastrous
Iran
legacy,” printed on the website of the Weekly Standard. Also, Paul Pillar published
on the same day an article that came under the title: “Israeli Hardliners
Harden Further,” printed on the website of the National Interest.
The fact that Gerecht, who is a senior fellow at the
so-called Foundation for Defense of Democracies, ended up recommending the
election of Hillary Clinton of the Democratic Party to be President of the
United States over Donald Trump who is of the Republican Party, is a bombshell
that will be talked about for a long time. Also, the fact that the National
Interest saw fit to print an article which practically declares Israel's
dealings with the United States to have been a 50-year ongoing fraud, is
another bombshell that will unsettle the long established paradigm according to
which Israel was thought to be the trusted ally America could rely on to tell
it the truth. Now you can imagine how much that fraud has contributed to
diminishing the standing of America
in the world.
The Gerecht article is almost 6,000 words long but you don't
have to read it all – if you don't want – to get the gist of what it's about.
In fact, much of it is a rehash of the Jewish talking points concerning the Iran nuclear
deal. The first paragraph which is almost 250 words long contains all that is
of interest to this presentation, including the author's recommendation to
elect Hillary Clinton. The last paragraph reiterates that recommendation.
You'll know why Gerecht ended his piece recommending Clinton over Trump when
you see how Pillar ended his piece. Here is that passage: “One of the two
nominees speaks of taking U.S.-Israeli relations “to the next level” – and it
is safe to assume she doesn't mean imposing consequences for the continued
occupation. The other nominee caused nervous moments in the Israel lobby
when he talked about being impartial.” This says that {Israel, always Israel
and no one but Israel} is the one issue which interests the Jewish voters in
America … Well, to be accurate, it's the one issue that the Jewish leaders want
the rank and file to consider when they vote.
Look now how Gerecht gently draws the readers into a fantasy
world where every marker of the real world is reproduced, given a different
shape and a different color so as to convey a singular Jewish message:
“All administrations are short-sighted. Even the brightest
can develop tunnel vision when they join the NSC or State. When the president
becomes obsessed with one issue, he will not appreciated the consequences of
his actions … it's possible he failed to see how the agreement would
circumscribe American action … if the next president intends to restore
American primacy, she will have to watch the Iranians walk away from the
nuclear deal. Downing the Islamic State is impossible so long as Washington is held
hostage by the accord”.
In other words, Gerecht has adopted the quintessential
Jewish approach of telling America
to dismantle what it has done for itself and replace it with something that
will serve Israel because if
you don't do that, the Islamic Shiite Republic of Iran and the Caliphate of the
Islamic Sunni State in Iraq
and the Levant will prevail.
It is that American approach which singles Israel for
preferential treatment, that makes the superpower not only an accomplice in the
crimes committed against humanity, but makes American officials look like
brainless tools constantly used by the Jews to commit heinous crimes on their
behalf while they hide from view and remain protected from legal liability.
Here is a stark example of that. While the Jews push America 's legislators to make laws that punish
families whose children attack the Jews that invade their properties and loot
them, Israel 's
leaders do this: “An Israeli soldier was caught shooting in the head a
Palestinian man who was wounded and lying on the ground, already subdued and
not a threat. Lieberman expressed support for the soldier [who may be
prosecuted] and Netanyahu visited the soldier's family to express sympathy”.