Ted R. Bromund and Robin Simcox wrote an article that came
under the title: “Who Could Possibly Have Expected This Anti-Semitism in Jeremy
Corbyn's Labour Party?” which means the writers were surprised to learn about
that development. But given what has been happening in Britain and all over Europe ;
it is we, who should be surprised that they were surprised. So we ask: Where
have these two been during all that time? Were they in a comatose state?
In any case, they were awake long enough to write that
article, and have it published on April 29, 2016 in the Weekly Standard. What
the article does is demonstrate that when it comes to fanaticism, you can take
the brain-washed horse to the fountain of enlightenment and moderation, but you
can't make him drink from the elixir of his return to sanity.
These two authors are supposed to be highly educated people
holding prestigious positions in what is supposed to be a highly respected
think tank … but look how they start their dissertation: “Utterly, totally
unexpected developments are occurring in Britain 's Labour Party, which is
led by Jeremy Corbyn...” Okay you say, it must be that the one they call Corbyn
was a good man who then flipped and turned bad in an “utterly and totally
unexpected” fashion. And so, you expect that Bromund and Simcox will describe
him as such.
But no; that's not what they do. Instead, here is what they
say about him: “...a man who once described Osama bin Laden's death as 'an
assassination attempt, and … yet another tragedy upon a tragedy, upon a
tragedy.'” Whoa! Are they saying that Corbyn was a good man when he mourned the
death of bin Laden, but then flipped and became a bad man? What a mind-boggling
thought?
Look what else they say in an effort to cement the idea that
they were surprised: “It turns out – and certainly, no one could possibly have
seen this coming – that some of Corbyn's supporters don't like Jews very much.”
No, we must now say that our two authors were not only in a comatose state;
they were frozen into a cryogenic state and sent into space where they roamed
for at least a generation. In saying: “certainly, no one could possibly have
seen this coming” they further establish that they remain cut off from the rest
of society.
But wait a minute. Could it be that Bromund and Simcox were
being sarcastic in saying they were surprised? No, they couldn't have been
sarcastic because they tried to find an excuse to justify their theory about
Corbyn. Excuse? What kind of excuse? What Jewish excuse did they imagine? Well,
there was only one way to doing this the Jewish way. It was to lie. And so they
lied.
Here is what they say: “In 2014, Labour MP Naz Shah,
[elected to Parliament in 2015] made a series of until-now unnoticed Facebook
postings.” So the inevitable question: Do Bromund and Simcox really expect that
people will believe that something posted on facebook went unnoticed for two
years even though its owner went through an election campaign, got elected,
became Parliamentary Private Secretary to Labour's Shadow Chancellor and also
sat on the Home Affairs Committee? Who do they take us for? Frozen specimen
sent on a tour of the solar system?
And they continue to tell their story as if no one was
scrutinizing it for veracity. But, this being a story involving Jews, you
expect it to be of the tragic genre; the kind in which the authors – unable to
tie-up the loose ends – end up shooting themselves in the head. And guess what,
my friend. That's exactly what our two authors did.
Having made it a religious dogma that “certainly, no one
could possibly have seen this coming,” they now say: “It's impossible for
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, or anyone else, to be genuinely surprised at this
turn of events.” Bang! They just blew their heads off.
These two geniuses (just being sarcastic) have managed – in
one and the same article – to go from “no one could possibly have...” to “it's
impossible for anyone to be...” With this, they made the possible and the
impossible sleep in one and the same bed. It is time to pause and take a deep
breath.
The moral of this story is that Jewish writers and their
echo-repeaters refuse to accept the reality that when the time has come for an
idea to spread, it will spread. The more they try to smother it, the stronger
it becomes and the faster it spreads. And so it is with the idea they call
anti-Semitism.
However, there is a practical way to stop a bad idea from
spreading. It is to deny it a reason to exist in the first place. In the case
of humanity's renewed resentment toward the behavior of the Jews, the way to
proceed is not to accuse people of being anti-Semitic; it is for the Jewish
leaders to change behavior.
Right now, the occupation of Palestine represents all the evil that
humanity has seen in the Jews and has attributed to them throughout the
centuries everywhere on this planet.
And no amount of bludgeoning the critics, or making
sarcastic remarks about them will change the monstrous image that humanity has
of the Jews. Their leaders worked hard to earn that image on behalf of the rank
and file, and they wear it like a badge of honor.