They unleashed a thousand barking dogs to chant in unison:
End the peace process we dearly love. But why end a process they say they love
so dearly?
Let me tell you why. They are the Jews who talk like this.
That's because they are religiously programmed to attribute to themselves the
virtues they see in others … and attribute to others the sins they see in
themselves. Since they love calamities of biblical dimensions – especially
those caused by wars – they see this as a sin, and attribute it to others.
Also, because peace-loving is a virtue they see in others, they attribute it to
themselves.
And so, when the Jews ask to end the peace process they
claim to love, they mean what they say about ending the process, but lie about
loving the peace. The reality is that the Palestinians are the ones seeking
peace if only because they live under a savage occupation, suffering at the
hands of merciless human animals. This is what the dogs have been barking at
President Donald Trump, trying to convince him that the Palestinians are evil
because they do not want the peace that the Jews are trying to end. Go figure.
But how can the Jews sell to someone an upside down logic
that is glaringly upside down? They can by playing a game that may be called
the double-upside-down logic. It entails beginning the conversation by telling
the listener that if he'll come to doubt what they will say to him, it's
because he is himself upside-down, and must straighten up by doing a vertical 180.
The aim is to make the listener subconsciously turn everything he hears upside
down, believing that this will straighten the thing. Also, when given a logic
that is upside-down to begin with, the listener will think it is right side up
and take it.
An example of this game is played out under the title: “Is
Trump Heading Down the Rabbit Hole of the Middle East Peace?” It is an article
that was written by Jonathan S. Tobin and published on February 14, 2017 in
National Review Online. This guy Tobin must be in a hurry because he begins the
conversation by clobbering his intended victim, Donald Trump, hoping to
intimidate him right at the outset. This is how he does it: “If he [Trump]
thinks he can solve the puzzle … he's setting himself up for failure”.
Now that Tobin has told Trump: “Forget the idea of
negotiating a peace accord between the parties or you'll fall flat on your
face,” he doesn't want Trump to think he is a warmonger. And so, he rushes to
attribute to the Palestinians the sin he sees in himself. He does this: “The
Palestinians' national identity is inextricably linked to the continuation of
the conflict”.
But those who know anything about the various identities
that arose in the region are familiar with the content of the Old Testament
where the culture of blood and gore is attributed not to the Palestinian
identity, but to the Jews whose beginnings were drenched with the blood of the
children of Egypt they murdered to inflict pain on their parents. And the story
of the Jews continues to be told in their Book where page after page, their
history is written with blood and nothing else.
Having started this portion of the discussion with a lie,
Jonathan Tobin discovers that he can build on it only by creating more lies and
weaving them together. His ultimate aim being to tell Trump what to do, he
gives this advice: “The strategy Trump may pursue is the opposite of his
predecessor's.” He explains that instead of pressuring Israel to make
concessions, Trump must pressure the Arab nations to pressure the Palestinians
to make concessions.
This is absurd on its face given that the Palestinians are
completely dispossessed, and have nothing that they can concede. But Tobin has
another reason to revive the absurd notion. It is that more than a decade ago,
the Arabs called the Jewish bluff. Because the Jews were saying they want
normal relations with their neighbors before ending the occupation, the Arabs
agreed and put on the table a plan (called Saudi Arab initiative) so generous,
even the Jews could not find fault with it.
Well then, guess what the Jews did to reject it. Here is one
example of what they did: “The Saudis' Arab Peace Initiative – there is no
reason to think either the Palestinian Authority or Hamas [will want] to make
peace with the Jewish state”.