Lest you believe that the “outside-in” approach to resolving
the occupation of Palestine
is something new, be advised that this assumption is false. In fact, the idea
has been around for a long time except that it took different forms depending
on who advised it, and when the advice was given.
The main difference between the early years and now is that
back then, the Jews nagged the Americans, asking them to nag the Sunni Arabs
about the necessity to nag the Palestinians to give the Jews what they wanted.
But now that a falling out has occurred between the Sunny World and the Shia
World, the Jews are thinking that America may not need to nag the
Arabs anymore. Many don't even bother asking for something from the
Palestinians because they know that Israel has taken all that can be
taken. Even the Jews are beginning to see the wisdom in the old saying: You
cannot draw blood from a stone.
Thus, what the Jews are doing at this time is implement an
idea they call the “situation.” Essentially, it entails the slow motion ethnic
cleansing of the West Bank – an operation that
should unfold over a long period of time. They are starting to enforce the plan
by making life unbearable for the Palestinians who live on that patch of land.
Their goal is to make the Palestinians decide “on their own” to leave the place
and go somewhere else.
For this depravity to succeed, however, the Jews will need
to have an Arab World that will pretend not to see what's happening in Palestine . And so, the
Jews fantasize that if they play their cards well, they can get America to woo
the Arabs enough, and accomplish this feat for the Jews. When completed, they
will be in a position to give their middle finger to those in Europe, America and the
other places in the world from where voices of condemnation will most certainly
rise.
So the question that the Jews are asking is this: how to get
there? And as usual, the mob of Jewish pundits has rushed to offer ideas. A
well known mobster of Jewish punditry is Elliott Abrams whose ideas – no matter
how badly they stink – are taken seriously in some Washington quarters. He wrote: “A big Deal?”
an article that also came under the subtitle: “Netanyahu comes to Trump's Washington .” It was
published on February 17, 2017 in The Weekly Standard.
Abrams answers that question in a typically Judeo-American
fashion. That is, he tries to rally the rank-and-file around the idea of the
“situation” so that they be ready to invade the American politico-journalistic
system and work on those who are prone to succumb under pressure and agree to
work for the benefit of Israel
at the expense of everyone and everything else. Of course, Abrams is not
telling the rank-and-file what the full plan entails; he is telling them a story
about the Arabs suddenly discovering they have an enemy that also happens to be
reviled by Israel .
To that end, Abrams starts on a cheerful note: “What a
difference an election makes. Netanyahu found himself warmly embraced in the
Trump White House … Trump has a theory of how to get there [path to peace]––the
'outside-in' approach that starts with the Arab states.” To motivate his troops
and get them to work as hard as they can, Abrams tells them this: “No doubt the
Israelis would like to see 'the big deal,' because it would mean normal
diplomatic and economic relations with the Gulf Arab States".
What he is not telling the troops is that an Arab package to
that effect has been on the table for more than a decade, and the Israelis
never took it because it specifies full economic and diplomatic exchange with Israel in
return for the end of the occupation. The offer is still there; it is still
open – and as shown by Abrams's performance – the Jews don't even mention it
because they want the West Bank more than
peace, commerce and diplomatic exchange put together. But now that Donald Trump
is in the White House, you see Elliott Abrams and people like him fool
themselves into believing they will be able to con Trump and the Arabs into
allowing Israel to have it all: The West Bank and the Arab package.
Is there any sign that the Jews plan to do that? Yes there
is. Here is the first clue: “Perhaps the administration can improve
Israeli-Arab relations and cooperation even if a final peace deal is elusive”.
But why would the administration want to do that? What can
the Jews tell Donald Trump that would motivate him to stab the Palestinians in
the back? No, that's not the approach the Jews will take because they have a
formula that worked for them in the past. What they will do is engineer a
failure and blame it on the Arabs. Here is how Abrams is paving the way for
this to happen: “Cooperating with Israel is risky for the Arab
states”.
This will be the cover under which the Jews will pull off
the failure that will sink the peace deal. But since Trump and the Arabs may
become discouraged and feel like ending the effort, Abrams tries to give them a
false hope: “[a success] would improve the lot of the Palestinians”.
To make sure Trump will not give up, Abrams plays on his
ego: The Arabs are likely to continue the effort “if a strong and reliable
American president presses them to do so over and over again”.
To make sure Trump will stay with it till the West Bank is cleansed of Palestinians, Abrams adds this:
“Arab leaders do not yet know if they have a strong and reliable president who
will make this regional peace deal a major goal he will purse over time”.