They made me do it. Were it not for the editors of the New
York Daily News, I would not have written to congratulate Ann Coulter for the
decision of the University of California at Berkeley
to invite her back, having canceled the original invitation for her to give a
speech on campus. But the editors wrote a piece, and I had to respond. You'll
know why by the time you've read the entire article.
It's a long story that started before Ann Coulter was born,
even before I was born. It simmered for centuries, then spiked sharply just
about a decade ago around September of 2007 – at least as far as I am
concerned. That's when I started this blog, and all hell seemed to break loose
when the criminal syndicate known as World Jewry tried to muzzle me. It had
been doing it for several decades already, but this time the syndicate's level
of hysteria was reaching new heights.
I wrote several articles denouncing the censorship imposed
by a worldwide syndicate that had grown to such massive size in America, it was
able to prevent people of the Bishop Tutu caliber from speaking in America, and
able to prevent publishers such as the British based Pluto Books from
partnering with American universities to publish works that might offend Jewish
sensitivities.
No, I am not trying to tell Ann Coulter she'll be able to
give her speech because of what I did. I am only one among the millions of
people who suffered under one sort of tyranny or another, and fought back to
make life easier for those who would come after us. And believe it or not,
there is more to the story of the struggles unleashed against tyranny than the
fight for the right to speak freely.
The truth is that all struggles started when someone fought
to be free of one kind of despotism or another. A few struggles were related to
religion or culture, but most were related to race or gender – a pair of truly
epic fights. Descendents of the African Americans fought the hardest and
longest but so did the Natives, the Latinos and the Asians. And then there was
the fight to end the second class status of women.
What Ann Coulter and those like her need to know is that the
fight for liberty of any kind was not initiated by those who were given liberty
as a matter of birthright. Thus, she must never forget that the fight for the
equality of the races was initiated by non-Whites. After that, the Whites who
were suffering other kinds of discrimination such as religious, sexual
orientation, physical challenges or what have you, joined the fray and asked
for equal treatment. Coulter must also understand that the fight for the
equality of the genders was initiated by women.
There is one crucial point that Ann Coulter must sear in her
mind because it will do her a lot of good. It is that the two epic fights
happened sequentially rather than simultaneously or in parallel. That is, the
fight for the equality of the races came first, and had been going for decades
when the movement to “liberate the women” started.
And here is what will blow Coulter's mind: To start and
maintain their struggle, the White women borrowed heavily from the struggle to
liberate the races. This is why initially, the women made common cause with the
Black, Brown, Red and Yellow skins … often taking a more extreme anti-White
stance than did the races.
Then, relative to the other struggles, the women gained
equality in the blink of an eye, leaving behind the races that continued to
fight for their rights. But what did the White women do after attaining
equality? They split into philosophical groups that matched those of the White
males. That is, some women – such as Coulter and the Fox News crowd – joined
the hardline supremacist movement that only yesterday was calling them not
women or even girls, but broads and the C-word.
Let me now fulfill the promise I made at the start of the
article. The piece that was written by the editors of the New York Daily News
came under the title: “Berkeley
comes to its senses about Ann Coulter's right to free speech,” and was
published on April 23, 2017. To begin with, a headline like this in a rag like
that would have been as hard to imagine ten years ago as seeing Netanyahu kiss
a picture of Hitler. And yet, here it is.
Look what else the editors have inserted in their piece:
“After the University of California at Berkeley
canceled a planned speech by Ann Coulter, [its] brass thought better of their
censorious decision and invited her back … Give credit to left-wing Democrat
Robert Reich”.
Is this a big thing? Yes, it is. In fact, it is a huge
thing. The young readers should know that the women's
movement, which started in earnest in the late Sixties, was led by ordinary
White women who asked for a little respect and some appreciation for what they
were doing. But the media and the politicians ignored them.
Seeing a vacuum that can be filled and
exploited, a number of Jewish women jumped in and led the movement. This is
when the media took notice, and they were followed by the politicians.
Because the word “Jews” has become a
four-letter word, rags such as the Daily News sometimes use the euphemism
'left-wing Democrat' to refer to them. That's how they have referred to Robert
Reich who is Jewish.
What they did is ignore the fierce
struggle that has been raging for decades to end Jewish censorship in America