Here is a typically Jewish reasoning that demonstrates how
the Jews process legal thinking to produce a system of justice that is out of
Satan's hell.
An example is played-out in an article that came under the title:
“Iran Is a Bigger Threat Than Syria and North Korea Combined,” written by
Michael Oren and published on April 15, 2017 in the Wall Street Journal.
The first paragraph of the article embodies the full horror
of the disease that is the Jewish legal thinking. It says that America signed
agreements with three countries limiting their unconventional military
capacities, two of which violated the agreements but not the third. Little of
this can be disputed, but then, the writer vocalized his conclusion, and that's
when Pandora's box opened to reveal the satanic nature of Jewish legal
philosophy.
Here is what Oren says: “The third agreement … honoring it
will be enough to endanger millions of lives.” He goes from there to tell why
the agreement with Iran should
be implemented in a provocative manner as to be insulting to Iran . This
happens to be the Jewish way of saying that the world is in danger because Iran is doing
the honorable thing of keeping its word. To understand how deviant this
philosophy is, we compare it to what is practiced in the civilized world.
Ever since our species abandoned the law of the jungle where
animals roam, interaction among individuals or groups of humans – such as
families or tribes – was based on the principle of equity for all. They shared
equally what they hunted or gathered together. As to what may happen tomorrow,
each gave their “word” of honor as to what they will do if certain conditions
materialized. Such word was a binding contract that was sealed with a handshake
or a promise written on a stone tablet or a document that's several pages long.
With the advent of the city-state and later the
nation-state, a social contract was codified into a constitution such that
everyone will know ahead of time what their rights and obligations were. The
rule of law was born and grew to become liberal democratic in some places or
harsh and autocratic in other places. But nowhere has the rule of law been
tampered with in an attempt to make it serve one group at the exclusion of all
others till the Jews came along, and schemed to make that happen.
I became aware of the gravity of this situation some three
decades ago when the Canadian Jewish Congress convinced a mentally deficient
government minister to spearhead a movement that would have an executive
tribunal rule in favor of a Jewish demand that Parliament had refused to take
up. The idea behind this diabolic scheme was to set a precedent that future
judges will take into account in the absence of a statute.
An old Jew I had come to befriend – who used to live in Europe when the Jews were tampering with the laws of that
continent – became so alarmed at the minister's move; he threw his hands up in
the air and cried out “light up the oven.” He explained that tampering with the
laws of Germany and
elsewhere was the reason why the judiciaries of civilized Europe
refrained from speaking up against the activities of the Nazis and the
Fascists. He saw that the Canadian Jewish Congress was repeating the moves that
led to the ovens of the Holocaust.
Michael Oren's article is the latest Jewish attempt to
circumvent the legal process in North America ,
and make it serve the Jewish and Israeli causes at the exclusion of everyone
and everything else. In Canada ,
for example, we saw a Prime Minister give a Jewish lawyer more than 10 million
dollars for a case that would have been thrown out of court if it had gone
there. The excuse that the Prime Minister gave for being generous with
taxpayers' money was to the effect that: “we know how the court will rule, so
why bother go there?”
As to the United
States , the Jews have been creating
deficiencies in the parliamentary procedures of the Congress, and have been
using them to their advantage. For example, they exploit to the hilt the
possibility to attach Israeli-specific riders to important bills. And they
circumvent the quorum rules to make laws that serve Israel and the Jews exclusively.
On the international scene, the Jews have concocted a
demonic scheme to do an end run on everything that is decent. For example, they
shipped pregnant Jewish women to occupied Jerusalem
where they delivered their babies … in an attempt to force the US government to register them as born in Jerusalem , Israel America
was recognizing Israeli sovereignty over occupied Palestinian territory. But
the government refused to go along, and the Supreme Court concurred. Now, the
Jewish babies are the ones growing up not knowing in which country they were
born.
But while the American government has rejected that scheme,
it continues to veto the UN resolutions which are meant to remind Israel it must
adopt a civilized course of conduct so that it may join the civilized world. In
addition, the American government remains in the business of mobilizing its
resources to repeal every finding made by an international body describing Israel in less
than favorable terms. The latest foray in this vein being the UN representative
telling the world that no matter what Israel
does, America
will stand with it and protect it.
And then there is Israel
which refuses to write a Constitution that will serve as a code of conduct the
world can look into and measure Israel 's
performance against it. In the absence of such document, Israel can and does behave like a wild animal
that fears no one because superpower America will pay any price to
protect it.
But why is that? It is so because the Jews have tampered so
much with America 's legal process;
they paralyzed the country in every enterprise it seeks to undertake except
when it comes to serving Israel .
This is when the brain dead zombies of the Congress come to life and hum like a
beehive till they fill all of Israel's demands and then some before going back
to their usual state of hibernation.