It happened that a report was released not long ago by the
Defense for Children International (DCI) detailing how the Israeli policy of
ethnic cleansing occupied Palestine ,
is using the method of murdering Palestinian children to pull off the ghoulish
crime.
This is an ongoing horror story that keeps getting worse
year after year, especially when you consider the fact that both the Israeli
soldiers and the settlers they protect commit the murders, and get away with
them.
And so, in a typical Jewish response to such reality, Benny
Avni has seized the story of Jared Kushner, now visiting the region to try and
broker a peace deal – and told his readers about the Kushner story by first
mentioning another story. It is that of Palestinian teenagers who caught an
Israeli member of the occupation force on their territory, and dealt with the
matter as would any people living under armed occupation – be they teenagers or
adults.
The odd thing, however, is that Benny Avni called the
Palestinians––not the freedom fighters that they are––but terrorists. And he
described the Israeli member of the occupation––not as the fully armed
home-invading thug that it was––but a victim of bad reporting by the “BBC,
Reuters and others”.
Benny Avni's article – where the aforementioned oddity and a
few more can be found and studied – came under the title: “Jared Kushner's
falling into a trap on Mideast peace,”
published on June 21, 2017 in the New York Post. Throughout it, Avni adopts the
mentality of painting everything Jewish or Israeli as models of perfection even
when they commit the most horrific crime of mass-rape you can think of: the
occupation of another country and the subjugation of its people.
He also paints everything Palestinian as models of
imperfection, thus accuses the Palestinian leaders of responsibility for
hindering progress towards peace. He does that shamelessly even as he composes
an article that fits the decades-old pattern––adopted by the Jewish mob of pundits––of
incessantly calling for the ditching of the peace process.
Here is what Avni says is wrong with the Palestinians:
“Palestinian infighting could frustrate any attempt to get
the two sides talking again. Abbas recently stopped paying Gaza 's electric bills. Gaza 's suffering won't end unless Hamas stops
being Hamas. For now, Hamas leaders won't use their own coffers. All that makes
peace seem far away. The contours of a final agreement have generally been
derailed by boneheaded provocations and impassable stalemates over issues like
prisoner releases. Palestinian inability to take steps for state-building has
also been a roadblock to solution”.
And here is what he says is right about Israel ; about
the Jews and about the American Congress … without betraying a hint of apology
for their shortcomings:
“Americans, increasingly, won't stand for it [Palestinian
resistance]. Congress is preparing legislation to cut US aid to the
Palestinian Authority. Then again, Netanyahu's political dependence on
right-wing political partners isn't helping either. His cabinet approved
building Amichai, the first new West Bank
settlement in 25 years. Will Palestinians deal with a leader who's intent on
building in the West Bank ? Will Trump?”
Now, my friend, study the following passage, and marvel at
how Benny Avni grabs a handful of nothingness from thin air, and constructs a
monument the size of the Great Pyramid at Giza :
“The president has said that unrestrained settlement
activity is not helpful to the peace process … Amichai, it seems, went beyond
the tacit agreements on settlements that Trump had reportedly reached with
Netanyahu”.
What is verifiable in all of this is that the president said
“settlement activity is not helpful to the peace process.” What it means is that
settlement activity – and not the Palestinians – is responsible for hindering
the peace process. But because Avni did not want to leave it at that, he came
up with a trick to change the meaning. What do you think he did?
To find out, isolate the three expressions: “It seems”, “the
tacit agreement” and “reportedly reached.” What do they have in common? They
mean nothing concrete. They are abstracts plucked from thin air. But their
inclusion in the passage makes it sound like Trump and Netanyahu had a chummy
discussion during which they both agreed on a protocol for building new Jewish
settlements in occupied Palestine .
The world is not going to analyze everything that's written
by the Jewish mob of pundits in such detail; it has better things to do than spend
time tracking the mob. At the same time, however, the sheer volume of the trash
that the mob produces, will eventually have the desired effect. It will make
the world believe that America
nudges Israel
to commit all those crimes against humanity.