What is glaring about America 's
repeated failures in matters of foreign policy is that following its military
victories in the Second World War, America was taken advantage of by
so-called allies whose purpose was to serve their own interests and nothing
else. To make it look like their interests were America 's
interests; they formulated fake doctrines and turned them into catchphrases
they dangled in front of America 's
naïve leaders.
First came Winston Churchill's description of the Soviet
Union as “a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma,” which prompted America
to set-up military bases around the globe to contain a dangerous behemoth it
though was in the making. Then came the French “Domino theory” according to
which the fall of Vietnam
to the Communists would cause all neighboring states to fall like domino chips.
Then came Yitzhak Shamir's cry: “Zey know nossing about za damacracy,” which
prompted the Americans to bomb and destroy Arab and Muslim countries like a
maniac possessed – not by one – but a full tribe of satanic warlocks.
The cumulative effect of these failures has been that
generation after generation, people around the globe developed unflattering
ideas about America .
Little by little, they came to view the ills they were seeing at home and
abroad as the result of American crimes. And despite the fact that America is
innocent of committing the heinous crime of colonialism, the people that
suffered under colonial rule continue to interpret every American intervention
in their affairs as a colonial impulse.
Worse, the misconceptions about America became even more
exaggerated when the colonially minded Jews took over the American information
apparatus. This informal institution comprises the so-called free press, the
government publications, the political pronouncements and the speeches given by
all kinds of officials. Because the Jewish effort in this realm is thorough, no
one on the planet escapes hearing an American – a Jew or a gentile – say
something offensive, insulting or threatening to them.
An example of what appears in America 's
free press and noted around the world, is the article which came under the
title: “The very good reason U.S.
troops are in Niger ,” and
the subtitle: “That part of Africa is a hotbed
of terror groups, and we need to confront them.” It was written by Bridget
Johnson and published on October 23, 2017 in the New York Daily News.
This article is developed around the doctrine of “We fight
them over there so that we don't have to fight them over here.” It was
popularized by the Jewish speechwriters of George W. Bush who stuffed it in his
mouth at every convenient occasion. But like everything that's authored by the
Jews, the formulation of the sayings and what they meant to accomplish were two
different things. In fact, the intent was to scare the American people, and
cause them to acquiesce to American troops being deployed in distant lands.
The effect has been that youngsters in Europe and America– –who
didn't think they had “a skin in a game” they know nothing about––suddenly
heard a different message. They heard the President of the United States
tell them this was a global struggle, mounted by youngsters who do not like the
way that the planet is governed, and wish to change the system everywhere.
Think about it, my friend, what can sound more romantic to the ears of a kid
that might have been contemplating suicide out of boredom? The result is that
many decided to join the effort, the same way that youngsters of different eras
joined WW I, WW II, the various Latin American wars, the Spanish War … you name
it.
Now look how Bridget Johnson handled her article, beginning
with a title that purports to explain why American troops are in Niger . She goes
on to quote the head of Africa Command who said that the US forces are
trying to ensure that terrorist groups do not move into the American homeland.
Right there, my friend; right there – this is a powerful enticement to those in
the homeland, who were never interested in the subject, to feel so challenged,
they decide to prove that the general is dead wrong.
Adding fuel to the fire, Bridget Johnson reassures those
tempted to join the fray that if they do, they will not be alone. Look how easy
and exciting she makes her invitation sound to young ears: “There are the
direct links between terrorism in Africa and operatives in the United States ”.
Lest someone – anywhere in the world – believe they have to
be born Muslim to qualify, she tells them they don't have to be Muslim to fight
for the good cause. She even tells them they'll find proof to that effect in an
ISIS video message that shows new recruits being drafted in the Congo, “which
is only 10% Muslim but lawless enough to entice extremists”.
Finally, Bridget Johnson gets to reveal her intent, and makes
her recommendation. Given that the current administration is inclined to
squander less of its resources in foreign lands, devoting them to its people at
home instead, Johnson tells the administration that, “extremism thrives in
isolationism. It is foolish to assume that terror organizations can be
contained if left to thrive a continent away”.