There was no way they could pull a subtle one this time and
pretend to be just an observer standing on the sidelines and watching. So they
squirmed under the glaring light of a full confession and yet; they mustered
the nerve to blame their deed on someone else as if nothing had changed.
That's what the editors of the New York Daily News did over
the years with their stance regarding the Iran
nuclear deal, and with the piece they wrote recently under the title: “Trump's Iran stunt
achieves nothing,” published on October 13, 2017. In this piece, the editors
first confessed that: “as an Editorial Board, we opposed the Iran deal, and
staunchly,” and then warned: “Back out now, and we're back to square one”.
But were they not allowed to object to certain provisions of
the deal while it was negotiated, and then accept it once it was signed? Yes,
they would have, but that's not what they did. The truth is that they continued
to oppose the deal – not just staunchly but vehemently – even after it was
signed, sealed and delivered. They did so relentless through time, all along
and up to this moment.
And there is no hiding the fact that it was the mounting
noise created collectively by a chorus of the mob-like pundits to which they
belong as Jews, that made it possible – indeed imperative – for candidate
Donald Trump to promise he'll do to the Iran nuclear deal what he just did.
And now that he did it, the editors of the Daily News are starting to lay the
groundwork for blaming the negative consequences on Donald Trump should
something serious result from that deed. So cowardly! So typically Jewish!
But how can something like this happen in a country that
calls itself a democracy? The idea of living in a so-called democratic system
is that you have a marketplace of ideas operating like a cauldron where all
that needs to be said is contributed by those who have something to say. And
from this molten mass, a product that is as solid, pure and perfect as diamond
is supposed to emerge.
Well, that's what happens in the democracy of the
imagination. A country that tries hard could in theory come close to that ideal
situation and maybe America
did at one time; but it's obvious it does not now. And there is a passage in
the editorial of the Daily News that recounts how an episode unfolded recently
along that theme:
“As a candidate, Trump railed repeatedly against the deal
and promised, and promised, and promised to rip it. Then reality bit. His
intelligence agencies, his Joint Chiefs chairman and international inspectors
all said Iran
is living up to the letter of the deal's obligations. Which would mean if it
chose to exit, the United States ,
not Iran
would be the one breaking its word. Meanwhile, the defense secretary
acknowledged that shredding the deal would damage the national security of the United States ”.
Where have these people been hiding when the public needed
to hear from them? By whom was the truth suppressed when it was necessary for
it to be revealed? For what deceptive purposes was the truth suppressed? How
could a so-called democracy been kept so much in the dark for all these years?
The truth came out eventually, but not at a time when it
could be used to counter the false claims of the noise makers. It came out after
the fact, and was used to blame the possible negative consequences that may
occur, not on the noise makers, but the victims of the deception.
Having pinned those consequences on Donald Trump, look what
the masters of deception are now saying:
“After the House and Senate fail to reach consensus on
improving a pact that took 15 months and seven nations to broker, he is laying
the groundwork for the United
States to withdraw. The President is unable
to get past his cognitive dissonance. We're not.” What gall! What chutzpah!
What insolence!
Empires and lesser powers fall when internal descent and
external attacks happen at the same time. These events are usually caused by
separate factors, therefore happen randomly and separately. In such cases, the
dominion can overcome the difficulties and survive … but not when the two
events happen simultaneously. In the case of America ,
however, the combination of the two factors was schemed by the Jews when they
discovered it was the fastest way to siphon off America 's
heritage, and transfer it to Israel .
To that end, the Jewish leaders––including the editors of
the Daily News––cultivated the likes of Tom Cotton and Marco Rubio, known to be
Netanyahu's boys in the American senate.
The Jews gave those two and others like them, the
responsibility to paralyze America
from within, and do so simultaneously with making America hated around the world.
They did and they succeeded beyond anyone's imagination, even Netanyahu’s,
their foreign master. Meanwhile, the twin calamities have weakened America
considerably; and to this day, no one knows how to reverse the trend.