Next they'll want to fill Firetrucks with Gasoline

Suppose you overhear a man say to his interlocutor: “Look at those kids playing with matches near the powder keg that's by the depot of ammunition. We should do something about it before the whole place goes supernova.” The interlocutor asks: “What can we do?” And the man answers: “Let's get a can of gasoline and douse the burning matches before their fire spreads in all directions.

Hearing that conversation you think this is not for real. You postulate that if these two characters are not escapees from a mental institution, they must be rehearsing a vignette for a comedy show about two escapees from a mental institution. But you know what, my friend, as stupefying as it may sound, this metaphor is not too far from the real conversation that the mob of Jewish pundits in America is attempting to initiate with the decision makers of America.

The attempt began a while ago; it is continuing at this time, and given the mode of operation that's adhered to by the mob of Jewish pundits, it will go on indefinitely or until something material changes … like a deafening kaboom or something. You can see the latest installment of that Jewish effort as it came under the title: “Team Trump can still prevent the next Mideast explosion,” an article that was written by Benny Avni and published on October 3, 2017 in the New York Post.

As indicated by the title, Benny Avni who is a member (presumably in good standing) of the Jewish mob of pundits, is saying that a critical situation exists in the Middle East, and that it's about to go big bang. However, he explains that we still have the time to deal with the little fires the locals are playing with if we go douse them with the incendiary machinations we inflicted on Iraq; on Libya and now on Syria.

Avni uses the rest of the article to argue the reasons why he believes that intervening in this situation is the right thing to do. But you'll find that his arguments were rendered moot given what you see in the first two sentences that make up the first paragraph of the article. The first sentence goes like this: “Kurds deserve independence.” This, in fact, is supposed to be his ultimate conclusion and yet, he has it at the start of the article.

Like it or not, this style of writing is allowed but only if you handle it right. Being careful what you do with it is an important ingredient because having revealed his conclusion early, the rest of Avni's arguments can only be assertive, and not predicated on events that may or may not happen. Otherwise, he'd be showing to have made up his mind, not knowing whether or not the right conditions exist. And this happens to be the mistake that Avni made as you'll see in the second sentence of that same paragraph.

Put in condensed form, this is what Avni says in the second sentence: “US officials need to recognize the crisis in Kurdistan –– a crisis that will explode unless we find a solution.” What kills the argument is the phrase: “unless we find a solution.” For Avni to conclude that the Kurds deserve independence conditional on us finding a solution is a contradiction in terms.

That's because “deserving” means to have a meritorious case that's intrinsic to the Kurds, and not dependent on external factors. In fact, the rest of the Avni arguments show what the external factors boil down to; and they are not pretty. Simply put, they say that independence for the Kurds means the breakup of Iraq, an Arab country. This will serve Israel's interests just fine, which is why we should help. Here, in condensed form, is how Benny Avni made that point in several paragraph:

“Here's the case for supporting Kurdish freedom. Kurdish leader Mullah Mustafa Barzani allied with Israel, even as Iraq battled the Jewish state. It's in America's interest. The Iraqi Kurds have been on our side for decades. Kurdistan will serve as reliable buffer against Iran and Sunni jihadists. Kurdistan would prefer to be an American ally. The Kurds deserve America's full-throated support”.

Considering that the Middle East has gone from being the Garden of Eden to being a Jewish hellhole by the creation of Israel in its midst; and considering that since the entity's inception, the leaders of Israel have behaved like escapees from a mental institution, it stands to reason that what they want to do now will further expand the hellhole till it’s big enough to swallow the entire region.

And don't be surprised if the Israelis and their cohorts start new fires throughout the region, and then urge America to send firetrucks full of gasoline to douse them. They are this kind of mental cases.