Michael B. Oren, who used to be the ambassador of Israel to the United States , is making himself
heard again, courtesy of the editors at the New York Times.
These are the characters that have been screaming to save
the Iran
nuclear deal but would deny God a space on the pages of their publication if He
said so – on the grounds that they don't have enough space for what He has to
say. And yet, here they are giving space to Michael Oren, the Israeli Jew who
says: “The Iran Nuclear Deal Isn't Worth Saving.” This is the courtesy they
automatically extend to every Jew that has something to spew whether it agrees
with their editorial policy, or violates it … whether or not they have the
space.
The quote above happens to be the title of the Michael Oren
article, published in the October 7, 2017 edition of the New York Times. Even
if the editors of that publication can hypocritically argue they allow for an
opposite point of view once in a while because it is the democratic way to
carry on with a healthy debate, what they cannot justify is publishing an
article that's entirely based both on falsehoods and the distortion of the
debates that led to the successful negotiation of the Iran nuclear deal. And
yet, this is what they did.
Michael Oren begins his presentation by quoting what he says
the Obama administration and proponents of the nuclear deal were saying in
2015: “The only alternative to the Iran nuclear deal is war,” he
blared disapprovingly. He then refuted that assertion on the basis that,
“nobody in the Middle East believed that the United
States would ever strike Iran .” Well, the Middle
East is populated by more than a billion human beings. For a fool
to make a statement like that, he would have to provide surveys showing that
100 percent of these people were questioned, and that 100 percent said they
believe the United States will never strike Iran.
Whether or not we assume that the Israeli Jew can fulfill
that requirement, there remains the question of what the supreme commander of
the mob of Jewish pundits was trying to accomplish. There also remains the
question of what the supreme commander of the Evangelical barking dogs was
trying to accomplish. We seek answers to these questions knowing that the efforts
of the two commanders were coordinated to produce maximum impact on the
American public and its elites.
The first supreme commander is Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel 's Likud Party who went around America , including the Congress of brain dead
zombies, to say that Iran
was only months away from having the bomb that will holocaust the Jews a second
time; this time in Israel .
He also stood beside a deceptive chart at the General Assembly of the United
Nations, and lectured to the delegates, gathered there from around the world,
on Iran 's
progress in producing a nuclear bomb. He asserted that the Islamic Republic was
near the finish line, and made sure to implicitly insert threats of war against
it.
As to the second supreme commander; he is John Bolton who,
time after time, barked detailed plans as to how an attack on Iran will be done using American B-52s on behalf
of Israel .
He said they will bomb Iran 's
underground installations with the heaviest bunker busting bombs, now sitting
in America 's
warehouses doing nothing. He also called for America
to give Israel refueling
airborne tankers to allow the F-16 warplanes to go bomb other targets in Iran and return to base in Israel . And
because he foresaw that some of the planes will be shot down, he wanted America to promise replacing every loss that Israel will
incur.
These were the two halves of one and the same campaign of
demagoguery designed to prepare the American public for another “shock and awe”
operation meant to take place in Iran this time. Taking cues from
the two supreme commanders, the mob of Jewish pundits emulated Netanyahu by
repeating his refrain over and over again, filling the airwaves and the pages
of print publications with the same message. As to the Evangelicals; they
mostly grouped in organizations such as the one calling itself Christians
United For Israel (CUFI); and got busy swarming America's lawmakers, pressuring
them to do what is possible and what is not, to spare Israel from being
holocausted … doing so by inflicting the holocaust on Iran.
And then, in the typical Jewish manner of shooting the self
in the foot trying to have it both ways, Michael B. Oren of Israel went on to
say the following:
“The alternative was never war. All of these assumptions are
false. The contention that Iran
will rush to make nuclear weapons in the absence of an agreement is unfounded. Iran could have
made that rush before but it did not. The reason was the speech by Netanyahu
and the implicit military threat that backed it up. The more credible the
military option, the lesser the chance it will need to be used”.
As you can see, my friend, it takes a case of advanced
mental retardation to tell the American public that when Iran is threatened
with military action, Iran will believe it, will dither and will cower. But the
American public as well as 100 percent of everyone in the Middle East will know
that America will not strike
Iran .
This is the saga of one, Michael B. Oren and those helping
him to write garbage for publication in the New York Times.