As time passes, stories come out with greater frequency
about children being left alone in a home that gets burglarized. What happens
usually is that the child would hide in a closet or under the bed and calls 911
to report a burglary in progress.
Having gone through an experience such as this, and talking
to their friends about it, you can imagine that the children and their friends
will want to learn how to defend themselves in a hand to hand combat, and how
to use weapons that may include firearms. They would have done all this before
leaving their teenage years.
These stories are real and thankfully, none in America has
ended in tragedy. So we take these stories a step further and imagine what
could happen a few years from now. Think of a teenager that had a scary
experience when he was younger, and is now determined never to be victimized
again. And it happens that his home gets burglarized once more. He grabs a
knife, lunges at the burglar and kills him.
The case goes to court, lawyers are retained to represent
each side, and they do what lawyers are trained to do, which is to represent
their clients as best they can. They proceed in accordance with the law while
disregarding the morality involved in the issues they are tackling. At the same
time, however, a public debate is sparked in which ordinary people, pundits and
politicians participate. You'll understand that the public debate will be
different from the one unfolding inside the courtroom.
So far so good because everything that's happening inside
and outside the courtroom is unfolding normally. But then it happens that a
lawyer on the team representing the family of the dead burglar injects himself
into the public debate. He tries to make a case that's so extreme it would be
unacceptable even in the courtroom, and would be overruled by the judge at
every turn.
But speaking in public, the lawyer makes the point that it
is not normal for a teenager to attack someone – even if he is a thief
burglarizing his home. The lawyer's argument rests on the notion that such act
constitutes barbaric terrorism. And so, he blames the parents of the teenager
for not raising their kid properly. He suggests that they must compensate the
parents of the burglar for the wrongful death committed by their child.
If you think this story is far-fetched, rest assured it has
a real basis. You can read all about it in the article that came under the
title: “How Ten Dem (Dumb) Members of Congress Encourage the Use of Child
Terrorists,” written by Alan Dershowitz and published on November 23, 2017 on
the website of the Gatestone Institute.
The setting this time is not America
but the occupied West Bank of Palestine
where the indigenous Palestinians lived for hundreds of generations; this being
the only home they knew since the beginning of time. And then it happened that Jewish
armed thugs came from all over the world to kill them and steal their homes.
These were barbaric activities that the Jews implemented steadily over the
decades. Palestinian kids and their parents, and in some cases their grand
parents too were born, and lived a miserable life under the boots of alien
beasts who consider them inferior beings ineligible to inherit what has been
their patrimony for thousands of years. Imagine the diseased Jewish mentality
that leads to this kind of thinking.
Despite the fact that the alien burglars were equipped with
the most advanced weapons ever devised, the unarmed Palestinian kids, who felt
they could no longer live with their necks permanently crushed under the boots
of savage beasts, decided they must try chasing the oppressors away. They
employed whatever means they had at their disposal, such as their bare hands,
stones, knives and whatever else they could think of. This is how the
Palestinian resistance movement started in the occupied territories of Gaza and the West Bank .
Alan Dershowitz and guys like him responded by telling the
American public and lawmakers that the terrorists were not the alien thieves
that came to kill and rob the Palestinians; they were the Palestinians that
owned the properties the Jews came to rob. Dershowitz et al blamed the
Palestinian resistance on the parents for not raising their children properly.
But they were rebuffed with the argument that parents in a society under
occupation can never control their children. So Dershowitz and his feeble-minded
morons changed their tune and started saying that the kids were listening to
leaders who inculcated them with anti-Semitic hatred. And they wanted the
American Congress to come to Israel 's
rescue.
So I ask you, dear reader: What should the Congress tell
these horrible creatures? Think of something. I, for one, would tell the
following to Alan Dershowitz: