One of the Jewish approaches that used to impress the
politico-journalistic establishment in America
was that the Jews made their listeners believe it was possible to settle the
entire gamut of troubles facing America
in one fell swoop. You can do it, they told their audiences, by getting the
foreign opponent that's making life difficult for you to answer one question.
To make themselves sound wise like only a Jew can be, the
person in charge of giving the advice would stretch the word “one” to make the
locution sound like this: waaaaan question. Yes, that's how they pronounced it.
They would tell the politicians and journalists what the pertinent question of
the day should be, and then advise them to ask the foreigner that waaaaan
question. And the giver of advice would promise that if this is done properly,
everything will be solved as fast as you can snap your fingers.
Well, that performance started to bore the public after a
while, so the Jews dropped it but did not forget about it altogether. They
modified it to harmonize with the current circumstances. Right now, they have
decided that their agenda will be advanced by blaming the ills of mankind on
the Iran
nuclear deal. And so, they came up with the idea of doing what's necessary to
convince the American politico-journalistic establishment that humanity will be
saved if America
did one thing: abrogate that deal. The approach they adopted, therefore,
consisted of speaking of waaaaan problem instead of asking waaaaan question.
You can see an argument to this effect by reading the
article that came under the title: “Iran 's imperial project,” written
by Ilan Berman and published on November 20, 2017 in The Washington Times.
Having used two thirds of the article's space to tell how
much Iran 's
actions threaten the world, Berman asked a question and answered it. Here is
how he did that: “What has made all this possible? A large portion of the blame
rests with the 2015 nuclear deal concluded between Iran and the P5+1 powers”.
Actually, he did not blame the deal itself for the ills of
the world; he blamed the fact that the deal allowed for the lifting of the
freeze which the P5 +1 had previously imposed on Iran 's money deposited in their
banks. In saying this, Berman makes it clear that the choice being Iran developing an arsenal of nuclear weapons,
or the P5+1 releasing the funds they held unlawfully, he would have preferred
to keep the money, even if it meant having to live with a nuclear armed Iran .
Not only did he make that statement, he went on to explain
it like this: “The sanctions relief provided Iran 's
economy a much-needed shot in the arm, and freed up funds that Iran has poured
into its modernization efforts.” Now bear in mind that Ilan Berman is not just
another member of the mob of Jewish pundits. He is senior vice president of the
think tank that calls itself, American Foreign Policy Council in Washington D.C.
Apparently, however, the current administration is not
listening, which is why Berman is complaining like this: “The United States does not have an answer to Iran 's growing
imperial impulse. To the contrary, recent U.S.
efforts in the Middle East have actually helped to fuel Tehran 's adventurism”.
But should these people not be held responsible for that
failure? After all, they were the think tanks and the pundits that advised
successive governments on foreign policy for decades. In fact, they were the
ones that designed the numerous policies which came under the rubric “War on
Terror”.
But look what Berman is saying now about that policy:
“Today, policymakers in Washington remain preoccupied with defeating the
Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, and they have spent less time figuring out
what we can do to prevent [this] from becoming a boon to Tehran in Syria and
the broader region.” And so, he advises that Washington should divert its attention from
fighting the war on terror to blocking the economic, scientific, technological
and military progress that The Islamic Republic of Iran is achieving.