Thursday, October 11, 2018

Fast Forward to the Past

'Back to the Future' has entered the North American colloquial in a big way thanks to a popular science-fiction movie that was so named. If things keep going on the political front the way they are at this time, there is a good chance that “Fast Forward to the Past” will also become a famous North American colloquial.

You can tell this might happen when you read the article that came under the title: “Trump's new counterterrorism strategy,” written by Clifford D. May, and published on October 9, 2018 in The Washington Times. What the author wants you to believe is that President Trump has a new strategy to deal with some fictitious war that can neither be defined nor described, but that he, Clifford May, knows all about.

May wants to say that President Trump's strategy is spelled out in a document titled: 'National Strategy for Counterterrorism,' which has the acronym NSC, deliberately chosen to be confused with National Security Council (NSC.) The idea behind the creation of this confusing trick, is that if the fake NSC were the real NSC, the document would officially be that of the President. But it isn't, and the use of the trick is just another way that May is deceiving his readers. His intent is to articulate Israel's policies by pretending they are America's policies.

Clifford May begins his article by quoting the first six words with which he says the bogus NSC document begins its presentation. They are these: “We remain a nation at war.” It is evident that the writers who composed that document deemed it important to start the discussion in that manner to assure the readers they are not advocating the start of a war; they are simply telling why America must embrace the war that was heaped on it. If you want to know what this sleight of hand is called, my friend, think of it as vintage Jewish psycho-trickery.

And now that Clifford May has asserted that America is at war, he feels obliged to give the evidence. But sensing that it will not be easy to do that, he uses another Jewish psycho-trick to buttress his argument. It goes like this: Because Barack Obama is a hated boogeyman –– fashioned by the spin doctors to motivate the right-wing base –– the said name can be used to stir the bile. This will numb the brain and prepare it for brainwash.

And this is the trick which Clifford May used as seen here: “Obama believed that the tide of war was receding, that terrorist groups were JV teams. He instructed that every war must end; it is what history advises, what democracy demands. Actually, history advises that wars seldom end by fiat”.

Clifford May then attempted to provide the evidence to what he was saying, but because there was no convincing evidence he could provide, he pulled yet another Jewish trick. It consisted of attributing to fictitious Muslim terrorists, the real terror acts of the Israeli establishment. What Clifford May cobbled together is reproduced in the passage below.

It must be noted, however, that because May replaced the words Jew and Judaism with the words Muslim and Islam –– thus creating a fake version of the events –– the correct version was restored by reversing the injurious substitutions. Here then, is how the passage should read:

“In World War II we defeated racial supremacists. In the Cold War we defeated class supremacists. In the current war, we'll defeat religious supremacists or they'll defeat us. They have ambitions. They value power, conquest and glory. A fanatic minority of Jews is determined to make Judaism a master race. Day after day, these people slaughter Muslim and Christian Arabs. Radical West Bank settlers believe the path to the future must be cleared by military force. Jewish gambling moguls have been the world's central bankers of terrorism”.

Because Clifford May brought up the name of John Bolton several times in the article, we cannot ignore the role that the latter played in the story. In fact, May attributed to Bolton words to this effect: We're confronting a terrorist ideology. Without recognizing that, we can't properly address the threat. The rulers in Tehran are bankrolling international terrorism. They sponsor groups that continue to pose a threat to the United States and our interests.

What do we make of this? Well, it sounds like the accusations that were hurled at Iraq in preparation to invade that country, causing America to commit its biggest mistake ever, kill its own and others by the hundreds of thousands, destabilize the entire region, and throw trillions of dollars down the Jewish sewer.

John Bolton and his associates must have loved that spectacle, the reason why they want to duplicate it by fast forwarding to the past.

Is it possible that Donald Trump actually shares this vision of America's future? Or is this a palace coup in the making?