If you've been interested — even for a short period of time — in
the undeclared tug-of-war that's been ongoing between the natural processes and
the artificial processes, you should have realized by now that the natural
process will always win the contest when going against the artificial process.
All you had to do to come to that conclusion was (1) look at the
remains of a city that used to be a thriving center in antiquity, now turned
into rubble … or look at a modern junkyard where artificially made products
that no longer function as intended, are waiting to be recycled into something
else. And (2) look at the aftermath of a devastation that was caused by a
forest fire or a severe storm, and marvel at the power of nature to restart the
process of growth and regeneration.
And so, the rule is that when it comes to tangible products, the
guiding principle is that the artificial will always decay whereas the natural
will always evolve. In fact, it can be said that the same principle applies to
the abstract laws of nature and those of man. It also applies to the schemes
that allow those laws to regulate the processes of what's natural and what's
artificial.
To take an example, letting the market govern the economy of a
jurisdiction naturally, will always win the contest when going against an
artificially planned economy. That's because the market will renew itself and
will evolve whereas the planned economy will, in time, decay and turn into
junk. In fact, this will happen to any artificial scheme, no matter how much “spare
parts” you produce to keep it going a little longer.
Broadly speaking, that principle applies to the sociopolitical
organization of a country. The reality is that there will always be individuals
and groups in every country, who will artificially steer the country into one
direction or another. Some of these people will succeed initially to one degree
or another, but in the end, nature will have the last world. It will preserve
the parts of the scheme that harmonize with its own laws, and disallow the
parts that contradict its laws.
No one has been subjected to such treatment more often than the
Jews and yet, they are the only ones who seem incapable of learning the lesson.
You can see an example of that in two recent articles. One came under the
title: “Left, Right, Left: Anti-Semitism Marches on,” and the subtitle:
“Anti-Jewish sentiment is vile and dangerous regardless of which part of the
political spectrum it comes from.” It was written by Cathy Young and published
on February 20, 2019 in The Bulwark. The other article came under the title:
“How Democrats Can Get Rid of Ilhan Omar,” and the subtitle: “It's going to
take a primary opponent, but not just any primary opponent.” It was written by
Liz Mair and published on February 21, 2019 in The Bulwark.
What follows is a condensed version of the Liz Mair article. It
shows how the Jews relentlessly scheme to subvert the natural process as presented
in the American Constitution, when the time comes to elect the people who will
govern the country. What is clear from the passage is that the Jews will do all
they can to sabotage the natural process, and artificially install puppet
governments at every level of American political life. They plant a clique in
each jurisdiction; a vile group that will abandon the American people, and spend
all its time doing the bidding for the Jews and for Israel. Here is the
compilation of the relevant passages:
“Rep. Ilhan Omar was sworn into office and has dabbled in
anti-Semitism. She is firmly installed, and was given a seat on the Foreign
Affairs committee. Her district is solidly Democratic. So is America stuck with
her or is there anything her critics can do? They need to beat her in a
primary. Omar bested two opponents. She won a five-way primary and became
representative. Jewish voters are not numerous enough to boot her out. She
might emerge from the next primary even more powerful. To beat Omar, someone
who is of a minority will need to go against her. Jenkins is the first transgender
African-American woman ever elected in America. She may or may not take on
Omar. A recruitment effort may kick off. A coalition has already shown interest
in ousting Omar. The reality is, the voters will get the same lefty policy no
matter who they elect. They will not get the representation they want from Omar
if they are Jewish”.
Liz Mair could not have made herself clearer. In contrast, you'll
find that the Cathy Young article is nothing more than a junkyard where the
used, the useless and the once useful talking points of the Jewish propaganda
machine, have been assembled by Liz Mair into an exhibit that is more of an
eyesore than it is an educational presentation.