When it comes to choosing between
politicizing American support for Israel, the rank-and-file Jews are told to
simultaneously choose YES rather than NO, and choose NO rather than YES.
If you've read yesterday's article, posted
just below this one under the title: “They muddy the Issues but claim to
clarify them,” you'd have seen how David Marcus was urging even the “enemy”
that is the Democratic Party, to get back at being pro-Israel by doing nothing
that's not politicizing their support for Israel during the ongoing election
campaign.
In contrast, what you have today is a new
article written by Dennis Ross and Stuart Eizenstat in which they make the
point that, “Israel should resist Trump's efforts to politicize support,” which
is the title of an article they published on August 22, 2019 in The Hill. In
other words, they are advocating this: do anything you want but do not
politicize your support for Israel during the ongoing election campaign.
So the question is this: what is it that
these people want from others? Is it politicizing their support for Israel, or
refraining from politicizing their support for Israel? The truth is that, like
everything else, the Jews want to receive it from both sides. They want to see
a gusher of political support for Israel from one extreme end of the political
spectrum to the other extreme end. But they want such support to be expressed
as love for Israel that is so pure, it is not tainted by any other message,
however minuscule the tainting may be. This is what the Jews call, having a
balanced view of the issues pertaining to the Middle East.
Unaware of the fatal flaw that's inherent
to this logic, the Jewish propaganda machine, which is orchestrated by AIPAC,
designed and executed a scheme for dealing with Jewish and Israeli matters that
paralyzes the system of checks and balances conceived by the Fathers of the
American Confederation. The scheme worked for a while but then started to crack
in two places: internally and externally.
Internally, the two-party system that used
to operate on the principle of standing in opposition to each other, morphed
into being mortal enemies of each other. This happened when a faction of the
Jewish Left embraced the neoconservative movement and defected to the
opposition. Like any divorce, there proved to be no hatred in hell like former
lovers feeling betrayed by the other significant half. In time, the loathing
between the two Jewish factions spilled over to the rest of society and became
blind hatred between the two main political parties in America and their
respective followers.
This added to America's woes by causing a
paralysis to its external standing and business dealings. Everyone around the
globe; most especially the superpower's allies, were stung by this new trend.
It was a development that happened because something fundamental was altered.
You see, my friend, the normal course of action in any project, is to start
with a vision of what you want to accomplish and design a plan to get there.
America used to be a good team player, participating in the planning and the
execution of these actions.
But then, it happened that instead of
moving in the correct direction in concert with the allies, America started to
move in a different direction while proclaiming it was doing what's good for
America. But the truth was not lost on anyone. Everyone could see that America
was trying to pull the allies into working for Israel and not for the American
people or those of the allies. It is that America had been taken over by the
Jews.
And this is when the Jewish plan of having
it both ways was unmasked and allowed to go down. It left behind a wounded
America both on the domestic and foreign stages. Instead of rethinking their
approach, and working to save America, Ross and Eizenstat wrote an article ––
addressed specifically to members of the Congress –– in an effort to save, not
America, but save the scheme that ruined America. Imagine!
Look how Ross and Eizenstat started their
article: “The two of us have long been committed to the US-Israeli
relationship. Israel stands as a bulwark against radical Islamist threats,
whether coming from Iran or ISIS. From this standpoint, it is both our values
and our interests that have underpinned the US-Israeli relationship over the
years”.
In the same way that they and other Jewish
leaders, have been able to maintain a tight grip on the rank-and-file by
scaring them about an evil world that's intent on harming them for no reason
except that they are who they are, Ross and Eizenstat are trying to scare
members of the Congress about an evil world that's intent on harming Americans
for no reason except that they love freedom, and the bad guys hate freedom.
And in the same way that their
recommendation to the Jewish rank-and-file has been that to survive, they must
come under the protection of the Jewish leaders, their recommendation to the
American political class has been that to survive, America must come under the
protection of Israel. Imagine the gall of the Jews and the degree to which the
Americans have been lightened.
There was a time when members of the
Congress would buy that sort garbage and act on it. It took a little time for
the American public to see what was happening but when it did, reacted by
demanding change.
Members of the Congress got the message,
but they are slow at digesting it and changing their ways. However, they did
make a start at moving in the correct direction, and that's a welcome change.