We have reached a point where it is now
possible to discuss a subject that used to be taboo. We can do it without
seeing mobs of Jewish so-called journalists and pundits rise up in arms and
wail antisemitism, antisemitism. The subject in question deals with the Jewish
constant incitement to start wars.
Under normal circumstances, there are two
ways to have peace. There is the peace of the grave, obtained when one side
vanquishes the other in a war that sends him to his grave. And there is the
peaceful coexistence that's implemented by those who negotiate it, codify it in
a body of laws, and adjudicate it when breached by one side or the other.
But you'll also find that under abnormal
circumstances, a state of no-war and no-peace can exist and can last for a
period of time, be it a long period or a short one. However, if you measure the
intensity of the tension that's generated by the state of neither a shooting
war nor a heavenly peace, you'll find it sitting somewhere between the state of
full-blown war that's at one extreme of the spectrum and the peaceful
coexistence that's at the other extreme.
You'll also find that a similar kind of
tension exists when you look at the relations which bind together the citizens
of a nation such as Switzerland or America or any country. And you'll find that
the same kind of tension exists in the relations that bring together the
nations of the globe in world forums.
When you probe into these relations,
you'll conclude that Switzerland, which stayed neutral during the wars of
Europe and the world, maintains a peaceful society and good relations with the
nations of the world. It also has a vibrant and prosperous economy that was
developed, not on the back of slaves or colonies, but by the hard work of its
citizens.
By contrast, you'll find that America is
the murder capital of the world when it comes to the relations that bind its
citizens together. As to America's performance on the world stage, it is now
considered by most human beings to be the number one menace to international
peace and stability.
It is important to remember these
realities when reading a column such as the one that came under the title:
“Making sure foreign enemies fear the United States militarily,” and the
subtitle: “Strategies must cover conventional, asymmetrical or any types of
'stupid' attacks.” It was written by Clifford D. May, and published on January
28, 2020 in The Washington Times.
With that column, Clifford May has taken
one step closer to speaking openly and truthfully about a glaring fact that was
known to the world at a time when the Jews wanted the world to pretend it was
not factual. It is that the Jews have constantly incited others to start wars,
and have been behind most of the serious ones that flared since the beginning
of time. Look what Clifford May is saying now that may have started the process
of converting his career into one of truth and honesty in punditry:
“We'd like to believe that peace is the natural
state of mankind. It's not. In 'On the Origins of War and the preservation of
Peace,' published 25 years ago, Donald Kagan wrote that 'war has been a
persistent part of human experience since before the birth of civilization. In
1968 Will and Ariel Durant calculated that there had been only 268 years free
of war in the previous 3,421'”.
That was a clear admission that Judaism is
synonymous with war. It is not surprising, therefore, to know that this has
been the Jewish view all along. It is what their bible, known as the Old
Testament, is all about. It represents both the history and religion of the
Jews, according to them. It is what makes it impossible for ordinary people to
think of the Jews –– who grow up in this kind of culture –– as not being defined
by the stereotype which paints them as bloodthirsty.
Clifford May went on to make a case for
America to gear up for a kind of endless “gray-zone war,” as he calls it. This
would be the sort of conflict that is neither a full-blown war carried out by
regular armies, nor a policing operation of the kind that exists even in
peaceful countries such as Switzerland. But why does May believe this is
necessary? Well, his closing paragraph tells you why. It reads as follows:
“Top of the to-do list: Discarding the
delusion that 'endless' wars can be ended by waiting for tides to turn, relying
on diplomatic palavers alone, withdrawing prematurely from battlefields, or
waving magic wands and sprinkling fairy dust”.
In other words, Clifford May believes that
the hundred or so countries of the world which are in a state of peace, must be
considered an aberration because they are more like Switzerland than America.
What makes them doubly aberrant in his eyes, is that they don't even have the
crime rate of America.