When someone that's known to be a good
person dies, their family and friends think of them as having gone to kiss the
face of God. Well then, it must be that when someone that’s known to be a bad
person dies, they are thought of as gone to kiss the face of Satan.
There are many reasons why someone is
considered to be bad, one of them being that they stole what belongs to others.
We must, however, recognize that not all forms of stealing are equal. For
example, a poor woman stealing a slice of bread to feed a hungry child, is not
the same as a clerk working in a jewelry store habitually stealing items from
the store to sell on the “hot” market at a reduced price.
And there are differences in the method by
which stealing is done. For example, the food and beverage purchasing manager
of a hotel may have an understanding with one of the suppliers, according to
which the latter delivers to the home of the manager a portion of the grocery
that's placed and paid for by the hotel. That's not much different from a
government employee that receives a cash kickback from a contractor for
awarding him a lucrative contract.
And then there is the mother of all
larcenies. It is a specialty of the Jews, considered to be so adulterated,
Satan frowns upon learning that someone practicing it, is coming to kiss his
face. Judge for yourself, my friend for, here it is: The Jewish method consists
of convincing a sucker––usually a muscular one––to give them something that
belongs to someone else. In return, the Jews promise to give the sucker a piece
of that something or give him a kickback of another kind.
When in the modern era, the Jews coveted
Palestine and began to implement a scheme to steal it, they chose Joseph Stalin
to be their partner. The man fell into the Jewish trap for a while but then
woke up to the reality that he was suckered into a losing game, and got out of
it in a hurry. The Jews then approached the two former colonial powers, Britain
and France, and made them an offer they could not refuse. They said to them:
You help us steal Palestine, and you get back all your old colonies. And the
two suckers fell for the scheme. But they came out of their hypnotic stance,
and faced the reality that they were suckered into a losing game, and got out
of it in a hurry.
The Jews then discovered America, the
mother of all suckers, and proposed a similar scheme to it. Whereas it was
thought that the Americans will follow the steps taken by those who preceded
them, and dump the Jews after realizing they had fallen into a Jewish trap––the
Americans reacted differently. In fact, what the Jews managed to do with the
Americans was implement a quid pro quo that stunned even Satan's team of
Maximum Deviousness.
Here is what the Jews did: They asked the
Americans to give Israel, money and weapons with which to steal Palestine and
what else they could grab from the other neighbors. In addition, America was to
defend Israel using its own soldiers and money. Because America is a so-called
democracy, and because brain-dead politicians are elected to run it, the Jews
will not have to share the spoils with the Americans. On the contrary, the deal
will bring the Jews the added bonus of siphoning off more money from the
American taxpayers to go to Israel. Only then, consideration will be given for
a small kickback to be paid to the American politicians who betrayed their
country for the glory of Israel.
You will find confirmation of all that in
the article which came under the title: “The Democrat candidates have
consistently ignored Israel in their debates,” written by Andrea Widburg, and
published on January 18, 2020 in The American Thinker. This is an article in
which the writer echoes the lamentation expressed by the Jerusalem Post at the
discovery that the Democratic Party of America woke up to the reality that the
country had fallen into a Jewish trap and was suckered into a losing game. And
that the Democrats are now pulling out of their old nightmare. The following is
a condensed version of Widburg's article:
“While the Democrat candidates had a great
deal to say about Iran, none whispered the word Israel. Aaron David Miller said
that, had it been a Republican debate, they would have been stumbling over one
another with pro-Israeli references. The current candidates feel they have
little to gain by speaking on Israel. Israel's friends haven't forgotten the
way Obama treated Netanyahu at the White House; they haven't forgotten Hillary
Clinton's lifetime hostility to Israel; they haven't forgotten Obama's
Extortionate weapons deal with Israel. The Democrat Candidates immediately
revert to Warren's trope of putting everything on the table in the service of
protecting the Palestinians from Israel's depredations. Despite the Democrat
Party's hostility to Israel, American Jews side with Democrats”.
While the Andrea Widburg article is a
typical expression of the Jewish supplicant being insolent at the
philanthropist for not giving her enough, Widburg went beyond all extremes of
beastly chutzpah with this passage: “Obama's Extortionate weapons deal with
Israel”.
Do you know what that is, my friend?
That's the 38 billion dollars-worth of weapons that America gave Israel as a
free gift, at a time when the latter was expecting more.
Whereas the Jewish media ganged up on
America trying to extort more than Obama was willing to give, Widburg now
accuses America of extorting from Israel –– not for getting something but ––
for refusing to knuckle under Jewish pressure and give Israel more than it was
willing to give. This is Jewish logic beyond flabbergasting.