Behold a couple of dodo birds conceived in the form of
human beings. Or maybe they are the two shape-shifting sons of Satan,
masquerading as human beings and sent to Earth to fulfill a mission. But if
that's the case, what would the mission be? Well, you'll know what it might be
when you familiarize yourself with what the two dodos are saying.
The two creatures are Michael Makovsky and Jonathan
Ruhe, both of which are props of the pompously-named Jewish Institute for
National Security of America. They coauthored an article under the title: “The
right strategy for Iran isn't regime change. It's regime collapse.” And they
had the article published on January 8, 2020 in The Washington Post.
As can be seen from the title, the two shape-shifting
sons of Satan –– if that's what they are –– have abandoned the long-standing
Jewish call for regime change in Iran, calling instead for regime collapse.
Well, before we start probing into their rationale –– if indeed they have one
–– let's pause for a moment and try to understand something. It is that when
the Jews used to call for regime change, there was some kind of clarity in what
they asked for. That's because the word “change” meant you remove the existing
regime and replace it by another regime.
And we knew what they wanted to replace it with. It
was a puppet government that will take orders from the Tel-Aviv/New-York crime
syndicate. But now that the two dodos are asking for regime collapse, do they
mean leave the 80 million Iranians without someone to govern them? Did they
contemplate the possibility of this many people becoming refugees, and the
consequence of the world failing to cope with a calamity of this magnitude? Or
do they mean that after the collapse, there ought to be a return to the same
old regime change with a hand-picked puppet government that will serve the
Judeo-American interests?
Let's now look at the narrative of the two writers to
see if clues come out of it that give away what the two birdbrains are
thinking––if they are thinking at all. The following is a condensed version of
that narrative:
“Since its birth, Iran has waged war with
virtual impunity. Only the Israelis have retaliated. After the US withdrawal
from Iraq in 2011, Iran became confident that the US will not challenge it for
control of the Middle East. The missiles fired by a drone marked a departure
for a president that had relied only on economic sanctions to pressure Iran.
The game has changed. Iran will now set about determining how much the game has
changed. To change the game for good, the US needs to boldly confront Iran.
Trump's statement seeking a new and improved nuclear deal is inadequate, if not
misguided. To loosen the regime's grip on power and the region, the US must
make regime collapse its policy. This requires confronting and raising the
costs of Iran's project, not just that which threatens American lives and
assets. The US must join Israel”.
It is clear from this narrative that Israel has been
trying to supplant Iran in the places where the latter was welcomed by the
local populations and where Israel had been rebuffed time and time again. So
now, the Jews want America to help them impose Israel on those populations. But
Iran was invited to come-in precisely because Israel tried to impose itself on
them. Calling on America to come and help, will make these people hate Israel
even more, and hate America in addition to that.
Makovsky and Ruhe are under the impression that if the
regime in Iran collapses –– whether or not it is replaced by another –– the
locals in the neighboring countries will appreciate what America has done. But
if America's rulers know how to read history, they'll understand that whereas
many of the locals did not like Saddam Hussein of Iraq or Muammar Qaddafi of
Libya, they did not like the way that America got rid of them either. And the
locals were revolted by what America's approach has produced. You can rest
assured that the same will happen if America tried to cause the government of
Iran to collapse or change.
The reason is that a military operation designed to
topple a government hurts the entire population of the country as much as it
does the government, if not more. It also creates a refugee problem larger than
any revolution has ever created. Needless to say, it is the neighbors who bear
the brunt of the refugee problem.
In addition, people the world over have learned that
when America does something, it does it to serve its own interests, and does it
usually at their expense. Moreover, most of them have also learned that when
America speaks of its interests, the spoken words are uttered by Jews of the
Michael Makovsky and Jonathan Ruhe ilk––like they are doing now. And this
reality transforms the utterance into a euphemism that means, the interests of
Israel more so than the interests of America.