Imagine a number of adults sitting around a table debating the question of how many angels can dance on the head of a pin. That was the great debate among the learned people in Medieval time. But now are modern times, and a toddler walks in on those throwback adults whence he becomes fascinated by their talk.
What do you think the toddler
will do? Will he question if angels dance on the head of a pin to begin with?
Of course not. He has not the knowledge or the maturity to determine that the
adults are engaged in absurd talk. What he'll do instead is try to find an
answer to the question they are debating. Until he learns about things that
would be tangible and verifiable but also incompatible with angels dancing on a
pin, the toddler will believe the story, and reject it only when he's mature
enough to stop believing in Santa Claus.
Now imagine a number of
scientists sitting around a table debating whether or not the weak nuclear
force and gravity are the two sides of the same coin in the way that
electricity and magnetism are. A baker walks in on them and becomes fascinated
by the discussion, wondering if these guys have found a way to make the dough
rise instantly without having to wait two hours for the yeast to do it. And so,
he poses the question to the scientists. Tongue-in-cheek, they answer in the
affirmative, and he goes home a happy camper, thinking that someday, he'll be
able to sleep an extra two hours before getting up to make the bread.
To the toddler, the adults are
the authority, and he did not question their judgment. He accepted the paradigm
in which angels dance on the head of a pin, and he tried to participate in the
effort to resolve the question they wrestled with. To the baker, the scientists
are the authority on the subject they were discussing, which is why he
refrained from questioning them. So, we ask these two questions: Was the
toddler mesmerized by the discussion of the adults? Was the baker fascinated by
the answer of the scientists?
In any case, what's the
difference between being fascinated by the talk of the authorities or being
mesmerized by them? Also, what's the difference between being mesmerized by the
authorities or being hypnotized by them? It is said that Hitler could mesmerize
millions of Germans while giving a speech. Was that a form of hypnosis? It is
clear that Donald Trump could mesmerize millions of Americans while giving a
speech. Had Donald Trump hypnotized the millions who came out to vote for him
on election day?
Whichever word you use to
describe the condition of people being led en masse by someone they consider to
be the unchallenged authority –– his pronouncements take on the force of a
dogma the followers will not want to violate. The troubling part is that they
will go on to live normal lives, even provide for their families, without
giving out the slightest indication that when it comes to falsehoods put out by
the leaders, the followers enter a hypnotic state and consider the lies to be gospel
truth.
Not many people would question
the assertions made above because these are realities, we all encounter in our
daily lives. What is similar to these assertions but more difficult to detect,
are the abhorrent tricks that the Jews pull and get away with most of the time.
It is that they have perfected the game of hypnosis to such a high degree, they
can make American Senators talk like patriots when they would be in the process
of betraying the country.
Up to now, how the Jews pulled
it off has remained a mystery. Lucky for us, however, an article was recently
published, showing some of the tricks that Jews pull to implement their
schemes. The article came under the title: “Peace Problem: Israel Knows How to
Capitalize on Its Conflict With Palestinians,” written by Lawrence J. Haass,
and published on January 31, 2021 in The National Interest.
Look at Haass's opening
sentence: “US envoy didn't say anything surprising when he told the Security
Council that Israel should refrain from settlement and annexation activity,
while the Palestinians should abandon incitement and payments to terrorists.”
Do you see the similarities between this performance and that of the toddler
who walked in on the adults discussing the dance of angels on the head of a pin?
Let me help you. Not knowing
what is possible and what is not, and not realizing that the story could be
false, the toddler took it at face value and tried to build on it. Something
similar happened to America's rulers during the half century that the Jews
silenced every opposition to their lies, while they covered the debating
landscape with wall-to-wall false stories no one was allowed to verify.
Whereas in real life, the Jews
have been the terrorists, and the Palestinians their victims, the misguided
Americans proceeded to arm the Jews and finance them to help them escalate
their terror activities while accusing the Palestinians of what they are
themselves. Not only have the Jews been the only predators on the planet to
denigrate, insult and demean their victims, they have managed to make their
American enablers use the same ignorant language when talking about the
Palestinian victims who suffer daily by the weapons that America gives to
Israel free of charge.
Now my friend, read the rest
of Haass's article and you'll see for yourself how the writer has described the
entire wish list of Jewish Central, and made it sound like it is the reality on
the ground today and what will be tomorrow.
It is how Lawrence Haass
sought to subliminally inject into the minds of Biden's lieutenants the happy
and hypnotizing thought that they can now sleep two extra hours because the
problems of the Middle East have resolved themselves.
Thus, instead of spending time and energy, kneading dough, they can fry bigger fish instead.