Example of a virtue weaponized by the devil

 Everything that nature has produced is useful for the maintenance of what is already here, including the upkeep of life on Earth. Therefore, even if something appears corrosive at first blush, we must accept it as necessary to maintain what’s here and working well.

 

This being the case, how is it that evil, whose manifest purpose is to destroy what’s here and proven to work – is also produced alongside the good things? Well, the simple answer is that everything that’s good is a double-edged sword which can be converted into a bad thing. All that’s needed for this to happen, is one accidental factor to occur randomly. Thus, all of a sudden, what was virtuous can transform into evil, and go on to produce still more evil.

 

You can see this transformation at work when you read the column that came under the title: “Pelosi showing up in Taiwan is not enough,” written by Clifford D. May, and published on August 30, 2022 in The Washington Times. It is a perfect example that shows how the Pelosi virtue was transformed into the Judeo-Yiddish evil which Clifford D. May proudly professes makes up what he has become. It is the story of every firefighter that becomes a deadly pyromaniac, every priest that becomes a brutal pedophile, and every murderous doctor who kills his patients rather than heal them.

 

Clifford May begins by telling his audience that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi cares deeply about the people of Taiwan, and this happens to be his story as well. Truth be told: This is the easiest way to hitch a free ride on Pelosi’s virtue bandwagon without explaining what he did that merits associating himself with someone else’s virtue.

 

Of course, we can speculate about the nature of the random factors that may have contributed to the rise of the Judeo-evil as well as the warmongers – such as Clifford May – but such has been thoroughly discussed elsewhere and will continue to be discussed in the future. For now, we can take it for granted that warmongering hijacks and exploits the virtues of others to confuse the audiences and hide its own destructive nature.

 

The columnist goes on to tell what Mrs. Pelosi has promised she will do for Taiwan upon her return to America, but then lamentably wonders: “‘So, what has she done to fulfill these promises since her return to Washington?’ Not much, as far as I can tell.” Thus, having associated himself with the Pelosi virtue, Clifford May went on to highjack that virtue so as to make it his own. He then proceeded to accuse Mrs. Pelosi of not doing enough to help Taiwan fight its battles against what he says is the rise of a Chinese menace that threatens not only Taiwan but also America and the rest of the world.

 

Having thus monopolized the Taiwan issue, Clifford May set himself up as the only judge who can tell what America must do to fulfill its obligations toward the people of Taiwan, satisfy the expectations of the American people, and reassure a world that yearns for the return of America’s leadership. In fact, Clifford May proceeded to do just that – and did it without showing a hint of the shameless chutzpah that ordinarily accompany this kind of  behavior. Here, in condensed form is how he proceeded to do it:

 

“That’s a problem because 80% of success is not just showing up. Mrs. Pelosi is a lioness in winter. There are steps she can take to strengthen Taiwan and more effectively deter China’s rulers. But she needs to act quickly and boldly. She might start with the Taiwan Policy Act of 2022, introduced by Bob Menendez. Its stated purpose is to ‘develop and put in place a new and more resilient strategy for Taiwan while there is still time.’ The bipartisan bill would provide $4.5 billion in security assistance – funds Taiwan would use to purchase US weapons systems already approved for sale under both the Trump and Biden administrations. Taiwan needs to become a porcupine – tough for a predator to swallow”.

 

As if this were not enough, Clifford May went on to nudge Mrs. Pelosi to press the House Foreign Affairs committee to advance a companion version of the Taiwan Policy Act, as well as making plans for the full House to consider such legislation before the end of the fiscal year.

 

And so, as can be seen, by the simple mention of the name Bob Menendez who would knife ten Palestinians in the heart for the privilege of getting a free flight to the island of hanky-panky with a Jewish so-called doctor, by mentioning that the political operation in America is entirely bipartisan (euphemism that means Jewish through and through,) Clifford May is saying he expects that the House Foreign Affairs will approve advancing the Taiwan Policy Act – pronto, with no questions asked, and no liberal democratic principles applied. In fact, who needs the American Constitution when he has a Jew on his side?

 

In case you wonder, my dear reader, this is the pattern that’s followed by all sorts of evildoers who hijack the virtues of others, who trash the original practitioners of the virtues (for not doing enough,) who claim that the stolen virtues are theirs, and then make the self-serving demands that surreptitiously but will eventually succeed at turning America into the basket case it is becoming.

Is this the way to carry on with a legacy?

 It so happened that during my stay at the hospital, I had lots of time to spend on watching television. I watched Wolf Blitzer’s segment, which he said was his contribution to carrying on with the legacy that his late father started.

 

To help him accomplish his task, Blitzer teamed up with the Director of the Holocaust Memorial in Washington who took her guest and the audience on a tour around the building. We saw videoclips of the atrocities that were perpetrated by the Nazis on individuals, on communities as well as entire villages. And we saw videoclips of the predator’s industrial-scale aftermath, presented in the form of a mountain of shoes left behind by the victims.

 

Perhaps what caused young Wolf to believe that he is carrying on with his father’s legacy is that the father was interviewed and spoke a few words – so did Wolf the son – but neither adding as mush as an iota to the history of that era. And so, we are left with the question: What was accomplished?

 

The answer is that nothing good was accomplished because this is not the right way to start a legacy or carry on with one. Also, because it is a truism that what Blitzer has observed and related to his audiences, is the opposite of what would have been appropriate to do – it must be said that the Wolf father-and-son team has failed to accomplish what it seemed trying to score.

 

It is that Wolf Blitzer spoke about the rise of antisemitism, both in America and worldwide, and offered to solve the problem in the traditional Jewish way, which amounts to nothing more intelligent than whine and holler about the pain that Jews suffer from the torture of the chip on the shoulder they never seem able to get rid of.

 

This being the case, whining and hollering about a pain that lost the force to invoke empathy in others, becomes the annoying reverberation of spoiled crybabies who want something they are not entitled to. Instead of empathizing with the long-gone suffering of the Jews, the audiences resent what the latter are up to, and they reveal their state of mind by exhibiting, if not amplifying, their antisemitic attitude. In effect then, the Wolf Blitzer/Jewish solution to antisemitism is the problem they are trying to solve.

 

But why are the Jews so inept at recognizing the source of their plight? And why are they not able to solve it once and for all? Well, the sordid truth of the matter is that since birth, Jewish children are inculcated with mythologies that have only a grain of truth in them, or have none at all.

 

The most egregious mythology is the one that tells the children: acquiring a nation of their own depends entirely on murdering the children of those who used to host them, and on robbing their treasures before fleeing into the desert where God will protect them and guide them to a new home. Thus, money, money, money, and the fanatic belief that anything they do to hold on to Israel, is kosher to Jews, a dogma they never relinquish lest they abandon the mission they were created to accomplish.

 

And that’s what blinds the Jews to the possibility that other alternatives could give them what they want in addition to the peace of mind that comes with being accepted by the rest of humanity. But in the absence of Jewish leaders, such as Wolf Blitzer, rectifying the Jewish narrative to modernize it, the residue that’s left behind by the self-serving Jewish hustlers tends to make young Jews believe that the whole world is against them, and they can rely on no one who is not a Jew to protect them.

 

Living with this kind of thoughts swirling and amplifying out of control in their heads, causes young Jews to grow up with the idea that each of them is entitled to receive a compensation package due to the 6 million Jews – said to have perished during the Holocaust. This being a number that approaches infinity, the new crop of young Jews get hooked on the idea of constantly exaggerating what society owes them, having failed to help them when they needed the help that never came.

 

Needless to say that an escalation in Jewish demands leads to an escalation in the expression of antisemitism both in America and around the world. And when this happens, we get further away from solving what has come to be dubbed: the Jewish problem society is experiencing.

 

Can the problem be solved at this late stage?

 

Yes, the problem can be solved, but only if the Jewish leaders are willing to play their part. That is, they should reformulate their narrative and make it tell the story in such a way as to reject the gruesome parts that glorify coveting what belongs to others, and never recommend acquiring it by shedding their blood or the blood of others while imposing death and torture on those who seek to stop them.

 

For, this is what humanity sees when it looks at Palestine-cum-Israel, the issue that will continue to weigh heavily on the neck of the Jews now and throughout eternity.

He is of Oz, but not a wonderful wizard is he

 You probably heard of “The Wizard of Oz,” which is a film adaptation of Frank Baum’s 1939 children story “The Wonderful Wizard of Oz,” and heard of Dr. Mehmet Oz, the 2022 supposed medical doctor-cum-politician, and have wondered if there exists a relationship between the two Ozes. Well, let me assure you: there is no relation between those two.

Whereas the Wizard of Oz represented Middle America, a decent and down-to-Earth — warts and all moderate Republic that was struggling to become perfect — Mehmet Oz now represents what America has instead become, a menace to all life forms which are still ubiquitous on Planet Earth. But for how much longer?

 

It so happened that during the decades separating the two moments, much had unfolded that exposed the darkest side of the human nature, causing human beings of all stripes to behave — not as the Almighty had intended them to behave — but as the destructive Satan intended for them to be. Instead of rejecting the ways of Satan, the fickle humans drank from Satan’s Kool-Aid, and became even more destructive than anyone could have ever imagined.

 

Unfortunately, the condition of horror that ensued — one that Frank Baum had warned against — materialized faster than the Heavens were equipped to catch and halt. The net result has been, not only the amount of visible destruction of “men and materiel” that can be observed, but the destruction of the good nature that the Almighty had intended to implant in everyone of us — his children.

 

By the end of the horror (circa the mid-twentieth century, it proved that “Good and Evil” were of equal force, and were at each other’s throats in their war to conquer and recruit human souls into their respective folds. This is ongoing at this moment, and whereas many of the humans are moving into the fold of Heaven, others are moving into the domain of Satan.

 

You must have guessed by now in which direction so-called Dr. Mehmet Oz is moving. But how can we judge other human beings without first establishing parameters that delineate the limits of what we judge them by? This being a good question, we must first attempt to answer it, and then proceed with our judgment. Here is a contribution that aims to do just that:

 

Because we are all born “tabula rasa,” we must admit that we cannot assess someone by comparing them with someone or something else in our empty minds. What we can do, however, is compare them with someone or something that already exists. Here is what we do in practice: We look at the worst cases in which Satan has triumphed, and label them the way that their authors baptized them. Thus, we have criteria which are happy calling themselves Fascist, Nazi, Communist and what have you. And so, we do them the honor of accepting their labeling of what they say they are..

 

 We go a step further and inject a little of the humanity that the Almighty deposited in us by showing these people that despite the destructive force they represent, we still believe they can be rehabilitated, thus choose the correct path rather than remain where damnation has placed them eternally. What we do is introduce them to the concept of seeing a silver-lining in every apparent lost cause. We do that by telling them there are shades of the destructive force they represent, which means that it is not a given they are irredeemably evil. This being the case, they can be semi-Fascist, semi-Nazi, semi-Communist and what have you … and go from there to becoming fully rehabilitated.

 

Has this been done before? From the murmuring sounds coming out the Satanic Republican Party where the iconic Mehmet Oz lives the comfortable life, protests were heard to the effect that President Joe Biden of the United States of America dared to take the first step toward rehabilitating those whom Satan had managed to snatch and pull into his fold. It is that the President had called a damned soul by the name it chose for itself: A semi-Fascist, He did so perhaps aiming to coax it to go all the way and become a virtuous and constructive human being. Let us join the effort.

 

But given the current state of the world, can the effort spent to accomplish this task bear fruit? The answer is yes, and I vouch for it. Here is my story:

 

I have been in hospital on and off, and then on again during the last 2 weeks or so. While there, I met human beings who call themselves orderlies, nurses, pharmacists and doctors. I could not understand why they still call themselves by these names when in reality they have ascended to the level of angels and cherubim who deserve to live in the sphere of eternal bliss.

 

What hit me like a lightening bolt was the attitude demonstrated by Mehmet Oz when his office mocked Fetterman, suggesting that the Governor would not have had a stroke if he adhered to a healthier diet. More precisely, the Oz said that “If John Fetterman had ever eaten a vegetable in his life, then maybe he wouldn't have had a major stroke and wouldn't be in the position of having to lie about it constantly”.

 

This attitude can never be accepted from people who profess to belong in the medical profession. But because there is a bad apple in every basket, we resign ourselves to this reality and do what we can to spread the lesson that President Joe Biden dared to spread when he took the first crucial step toward rehabilitating those whom Satan had managed to snatch and pull into his fold. It is that the president called the damned soul by the name it chose for itself: A semi-Fascist … perhaps aiming to coax it to move all the way to the contemporary nirvana, and become a virtuous as well as a constructive human being.

 

Joe Biden has done it, so can everyone that wants it to be.

Self-deception that can lead to ruin

 For the purpose of this experiment, register in your mind the exact sentiment that gripped you when you will have read the following sentence: “He is a millionaire today because he was able to defraud me of ten dollars not long ago.” Absurd, isn’t it?

 

Well, my friend, this is exactly the same sentiment you should be gripped with every time you hear the pundits that holler and beat their breasts and knock their heads against the wall every time they say that the Chinese are doing better than the Americans in high technology because the Chinese steal the inferior American technologies.

 

But the truth can be extrapolated from the claim that America is an exceptional country, from the frantic calls for opening the door wider to the students of other countries (especially the Asians,) from the recognition that America’s technological advancement came about largely because immigrants from around the world founded the businesses that hired the local workers whose work has added to the national wealth. In fact, the evidence is abundant to the effect that America was the one to benefit from the genius of other nations, not the other way around.

 

Because we know what a bruised ego does to human beings who are caught in a losing competition, having once been at the top of their field, we shall not ask this question: “Why is it that the American pundits repeatedly accuse the Chinese of stealing American technology?” For those who are interested in such matter, the answer to that question is out there, and easy to understand.

 

Let’s instead concentrate on probing into what kind of culture the habit of self-deception is transforming what used to be a normal America. A revealing example that’s good to study would be the evolving relationship between America and China. But because both countries live in a world that is itself changing as rapidly as they, we begin by unveiling a few realities about that world.

 

At the end of World War II – scarcely three generations ago – China was a basket case whereas America was the undisputed master of the world. It was leading everyone in every field, and serving as beacon of light for those who needed guidance to navigate the brave new world in the making. But then, relying on what they used to call their “inner strength,” the Chinese people looked to America, not with envy, but with the determination that they can do as well, if not better, thus restore to themselves the glory they used to enjoy when they were leading everyone in every field, and serving as beacon of light to those who needed guidance navigating the brave new world that was shaping at that time.

 

To that end, the Chinese people treated themselves with a Cultural Revolution that was as painful as a civil war but without producing the large number of dead and wounded that’s generally associated with civil wars. When all was said and done, a “new Chinese citizen” had been formed, and he/she set out to leapfrog ahead of the Americans and all the others, placing themselves at the leading edge of everyone in every field, thus serve as beacon of light for those who will need guidance to navigate the brave new world that China is fashioning for the future and for many tomorrows after that.

 

But instead of welcoming the Chinese initiatives and offering to join the effort to help rebuild the new world, the Americans saw the Chinese new capabilities as being a threat to what they thought was a right meant to be exclusive to them. And so, the Americans responded – not with a welcoming mat extended to their Chinese counterparts but with a paranoic gun they pointed at the Chinese, and a sign that said: You could not have accomplished any of this on your own; therefore you must have stolen it from us”. 

 

This American attitude started the new Cold War between China and America; an attitude that does not promise to deliver an end as quietly as did the first Cold War. You can sense this reality from what the modern pundits are suggesting, and from what they describe as being the stakes they stand to lose if America fails to check what they describe as being the Chinese ambitions.

 

Alas, you also discover that the Americans are chasing – not a wild goose – but a non-existent goose when you delve into the nitty-gritty of how they understand the new economics work or how they can exploit what they see to advantage them. Here is what the American pundits are missing:

 

When the economies of the world were measured in millions of dollars, and an ounce of gold could be mined for less that 35 dollars, it made sense for the central banks to insists that those they licensed must maintain a minimum reserves in gold to guarantee that they can fulfill their obligations should there be a run on the bank. It is that enough gold was mined cheaply, and served that purpose adequately till something changed. As it happened, the economies of the world expanded at a much faster rate than new gold deposits could be discovered or mined. The result has been that to maintain gold as reserve to guarantee the stability of bank deposits, would require letting the price of gold rise to stellar levels. Doing so would have raised the price of all commodities, causing the economies of the world to crash.

 

Something had to be done, and it was. The central banks dropped the idea of insisting that gold be used to guarantee the safety of deposits, and the commercial banks developed the idea of showing how safe they were by accumulating enough foreign currencies to defend their own should that become necessary. The American dollar being the most popular at the time, it became the reserve currency of the world. If not de jure – the American central bank (The Fed) became the de facto central bank of the world.

 

All of this happened at a time when the world was searching for something (anything at all) that would replace gold as reserve for their central banks. Among the suggestions was the idea of creating a kind of “Monopoly” money that would play the role. When the American dollar proved to be popular, the bankers of the world resigned themselves to accepting it as the monopoly money they imagined would serve their purpose. And so it did, and so it remains to this day.

 

But what about tomorrow and the days after that?

 

Unless America gets over its paranoia and sits with the other powers to discuss how to make this world a better place, America will turn into a toy that will be used to bring smiles to the children of the future, and nothing more serious than that.

Serial killer decries neighborhood security

 A space as large as the infinite universe – maybe even larger, separates the two adjectives: “whopping,” and “measly.” In fact, you will understand my disappointment if I said I played the lottery and won a measly ten dollars. That’s because ten dollars do not get you far these days.

 

On the other hand, you will understand my elation if I told you I won a billion dollars playing the lottery. That’s because a billion dollars can make anyone’s dream come true.

 

Those two adjectives, and others like them, are tools kept in the toolbox of the spin doctors who use them to stretch or to compress the meaning of a third party’s argument. They help the spin doctors stretch or compress or mutilate an argument, thus make you believe in something that’s vastly different from what the argument intended to convey in the first place.

 

Some people have embraced the culture of distortion so thoroughly, however, distorting the reality of a situation comes naturally to them without them using the adjectives that would risk giving them away. One of these people is Clifford D. May who wrote a piece clearly showing how adept he is at inflating the work of some people, and deflating that of others, thus create a gap between them that’s as large as the infinite universe – maybe even larger.

 

Clifford May’s article came under the title: “Reporters in Gaza have never been free,” published on August 16, 2022 in The Washington Times. As can be seen, a substitute adjective: “never” is used here to begin the process of deflating one side of the argument (the Palestinian,) and in so doing, making the other side (the Israeli) look larger than it is.

 

Here, in condensed form, is what Clifford May says the Palestinian group Hamas has done, which he finds objectionable and wants the whole world to condemn:

 

“To show it still rules the roost, Hamas issued restrictions on foreign journalists working in Gaza, following the conflict that erupted between Israel and Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Among the restrictions: a prohibition against reporting on Gazans killed by misfired Palestinian rockets and a requirement that Israel be blamed for the battle. In addition, Hamas ordered foreign correspondents to employ Palestinian ‘sponsors’ who must submit reports on where those correspondents go, what they do and any ‘illogical questions’ they ask. The new rules warned that sponsors must ‘demonstrate national spirit, defend the Palestinian narrative and reject the foreigner’s bias to the Israeli narrative.’ The Foreign Press Association protested these restrictions.’ Discussions ensued and, the FPA happily announced that Hamas officials had come around. Director of the government media office in Gaza, agreed. A happy ending, right? Not exactly. The Associated Press pointed out: ‘Even if the rules are officially withdrawn, Hamas has still signaled its expectations, which could have a chilling effect on critical coverage.’ That, too, fails to reflect a reality which is this: Reporters in Gaza have never been free and are not now”.

 

All you need to do to gauge the horrific mutilation that’s packed in that passage, is be a resident of Planet Earth to see that what Clifford May propagates here, is a bunch of hooey disguised as sumptuous meals offered to news junkies who would dig-in before bothering to inspect what they are about to stuff into their bodies. It is that the truth is out there for all to see.

 

For example, when a war erupts between Hamas or a Palestinian group, Gaza opens itself to foreign correspondents who see all that happens there, and they report on it. By contrast, Israel does nothing more imaginative than broadcast all about the Gaza rockets that miss Jews in Israel, and pinpoint instead the Palestinian or Druze children who live there – and kill them. Clifford May and all those like him expect you to consume this garbage like a child takes in fairytales.

 

In fact, when you go over each sentence in the Clifford May narrative, you will realize that to produce it, the writer did nothing better than reprint the general directives issued by Jewish Central, and accused Hamas of issuing them without acknowledging where they originated.

 

Worse of all, is the reality that when the Jews of Israel proved they can get away with distortions of this magnitude, their confidence buoyed so massively, they dared to transfer their mentality to other jurisdictions, most notably America, which is one of the many English speaking victims to succumb to the fascist censorship that the Jews have spread around the globe by accusing those who resist them of being antisemitic and working to bring about Holocaust II.

 

Now that Hamas woke up to the reality that Israel and its worldwide cohorts have been making gains playing the game that they do – has decided not to play the game itself – but to shine light on it so as to show the foreign press the need to be even-handed in their coverage of what happens in Gaza. What Hamas did was rule that the foreign press must treat Palestinians the same way they treat Jews, but then rescinded the rules to let the foreign correspondents formulate them by themselves.

 

Using mouthpieces like Clifford May, Israel objected to that Hamas effort, and this goes to prove that Hamas is the civilized side of the equation whereas Israel and its worldwide cohorts are the serial killers who wish to continue ravaging the quiet neighborhoods of the world. Savages to the end.

This job will not be complete until…

 In a manner that is more bizarre than the fictitious “Manchurian Candidate,” the real life drama of Jewish existence on Planet Earth has created an intriguing analog that can only be termed “The Lowlife Candidate”.

 

This happened because the Jews think of their sojourn on Earth as a continually unfolding story which began when God created them to stand as his favorite children. And in the way that dramatic tension is shaped to make a storyline sound interesting, the structure of Jewish stories are made to unfold around a plot that intertwines with one or more sublots. In fact, the Jews think of their existence as having one central plot that’s led by themselves, unwinding with several subplots supported by lesser characters.

 

And so, as life goes on, the collective Jews view themselves as the character whose triumphs, defeats and other vicissitudes tell the story of the human condition – all of that being supported by a chorale of humanity that does nothing more elaborate than respond to the daily moves and twitches of the Jew.

 

In a good drama that unfolds naturally, there always is a gradual rise of tension meant to grab the attention of the audience, and color the imagination. This usually happens when the leading character of the main plot is opposed or challenged by the lesser characters who leave their dens in the subplots, and seek to score gains on the stage of mainstream living.

 

Meanwhile, refusing to believe that they are not always the leading character who operates alone in the main plot of the story, the Jews fail to realize that when they challenge someone they believe is weaker than they, they could be taking the risk of going against a superior power that’s capable of harming them. In fact, that’s the mistake the Jews commit all the time. They get beaten up, try the same thing again and again always expecting the different result that never shows up. What a display of insanity!

 

Some of the people who would have read the above paragraphs, will see a resemblance, if only a faint one, between the behavior of Jews they might have encountered in real life, and the narrative they have been reading. But what most of these people will not know, is that professionals trained in their respective fields – had also been observing the Jewish behavior and were drawing entirely different conclusions.

 

These would be the analysts of all kind who now operate at the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA.) They watch the Jews play the game of hypnotizing prominent Americans and their children – attracting them into the Jewish orbit, and sealing their fate as being victims of the Zionist Kool-Aid from which they drink. They are programmed to dismantle the American experiment and use the pieces to help build the Jewish empire that never seems to come about.

 

Time after time, the FBI working in concert with the CIA, noticed how close the Jewish establishment had come to repeating the Jonathan Pollard story who stole American secrets and gave them to Israel which used them to pull off an operation involving an Iraqi nuclear installation. Israel and the Jews got away with it this time, but the FBI and CIA understood that another treasonous act of this kind – especially while going against Iran – will carry the risk of dragging America into a global nuclear war.

 

Meanwhile, given that they have the practical experience, the training and the support they need, agents of the worldwide crime syndicate do their work in the most subtle of ways, the reason why it has been difficult to catch them in the act of committing treason. But one thing has escaped the Jews. It is that a new cadre of analysts at the FBI and the CIA have developed a tool by which to recognize what the Jews are up to as they go about the business of hypnotizing and maneuvering the soulless American politico-journalists into doing the dirty work for them.

 

What the FBI and CIA have developed, is a sharp understanding of the way that the Jews allow their drama to unfold, how the plot and subplots intertwine, how the characters intermingle to create tension, and how the denouement comes about – which are the tricks that gave Israel and the Jews moments of triumph at the expense of America and the American people.

 

Did the FBI and CIA use that acumen to uncover the scheme that was concocted just lately by the Lowlife Candidate? Well, it seems like they did. From what has been published so far, agents of the two institutions seem to have seen how close the Lowlife had come to slashing the jugular of the American homeland, thus decided to move in and end the savagery.

 

However, it will be a shame if the FBI and CIA did not seize the opportunity to complete the job by cracking open the cesspool which reflects the open bordello the America-Israel relationship has become. It nauseates a humanity that can no longer watch the abusive skunk spray chemicals in the face of a self-declared policemen of the world who gets deliriously high inhaling the stinky stuff.

 

If the FBI and CIA fail to do their duty, which is to dismantle the American-protected nuclear Judeo-Yiddish menace, thus allow humanity to develop naturally – whomever will be there after the Jews will have played their last trick – will forever remember that the American experiment has been an abject failure. They will teach the sordid history in school, describing the American experience as having been the horror story that wore the mask of success, and took humanity to its ultimate doom.

Musings that could predict the implausible

 The one thing about the human mind, which differentiates us from the rest of the primates, is that it renders our imagination infinitely more agile than the others. To be sure, this is a double-edged sword in the sense that we can imagine life-destructive measures and implement them as easily as we can imagine life-preserving measures and implement them.

 

The mind, which is wired to be in a constant state of activity, begins the process of imagination by musing over ideas that relieve the individual of the boredom of idleness. Depending on what happened in the recent past, and still occupies the attention of the individual, he/she will pursue a line of thinking that stretches deep into the labyrinth of vengeance, or pursue a line of thinking that stretches deep into the temple of blissful reconciliation.

 

Because this discussion was prompted by the publication of an article that was written by Clifford D. May, who is as dark and labyrinthine as they come, we let his soul take our imagination on a tour of the most terrifying hideouts inside the scariest of his instincts. We do so in the hope of encountering and assessing the destructive tendencies that make Clifford May the fantasy generator of so much wished-for horror he wishes to see descend on the human race.

 

His latest attempt came in the form of a column he wrote under the tile: “The ‘forever war’ against the West, and the subtitle: “America wins a battle against al Qaeda, Israel against Islamic Jihad,” published on August 9, 2022 in The Washington Times.

 

The article lets us imagine that following the peace pact forged between the 1970s street gangs of Los Angeles, known as the Bloods and the Crips — the leaders of the two outfits met and put together a scheme that will allow them to break the monotony of peaceful coexistence, thus rekindle the grand old time they were having when fighting each other and enjoying every minute of the gruesome games they used to play. Here is the new plan they stitched together:

 

They’ll move out of Los Angeles and go to another city where they’ll start fresh and hope to avoid the pitfalls that brought an end to their reign of terror in LA. They’ll go to Chicago where they’ll operate as no-name street thugs and try to remain as anonymous as they can. They’ll deliberately commit acts that project a horrifying level of cowardice — such as shooting to death mothers who stroll baby carriages — so as to force the local police getting involved, thus add spice to their adventure.

 

Is there anything in the Clifford May article that hints at a scenario unfolding in that manner, thus serve as a metaphor that will help us predict what else the two gangs of organized thugs might want to do next? The answer is yes, there are such hints, and the following is the condensed version of excerpts that point to them:

 

“Two missiles targeted the 71-year-old emir of Qaeda who was taking his morning tea on the balcony of a well-appointed home in an exclusive Kabul neighborhood. Eliminating terrorist leaders is useful. But those waging jihad tend to be tenacious. The phrase ‘forever war’ doesn’t daunt them. It inspires them. The rulers of China and Russia also are waging a kind of war against the West. To survive in the jungle, you must defend yourself, not just against lions. The crocodiles can eat you, too. Against these and other enemies, Israelis fight wars and ‘wars between wars.’ On Friday, the IDF launched an airstrike in Gaza, killing PIJ Northern Gaza Division commander. On Saturday, the IDF killed PIJ Southern Gaza Division commander and several other PIJ officials. PIJ fired more than a thousand missiles at Israeli. On Monday, with Egypt acting as broker, a ceasefire was announced. The PIJ leader spent the weekend in Tehran meeting with the president of the Islamic Republic. What are they planning to do next? Al Qaeda and PIJ have been hit hard. But neither organization will be ‘gone’ anytime soon”.

 

Unable to speak of the Bloods and the Crips without dragging into the conversation the Iranians, the Israelis, the Russians and the Chinese — Clifford May has exposed the crucial nexus that connects every ounce of horror that has plagued Planet Earth since the time when the Jews started to fantasize about the destruction of Egypt — the planet’s first superpower — with a series of imagined plagues that never materialized in real life. But what might that nexus be? Well, the only thing which is common to all these gut wrenching reveries, is none other than the existence of the Jews themselves. It makes them, if not the ingredient, at least the catalyst that produces the pain and suffering, we never seem capable of getting rid of on our home planet.

 

This leads us to the logical and final question: What does that foretell about the future of the human race? Well, the safest thing to conjecture is to assert that because this is the way it always was, it is the way it’ll always be. But some people will deviate from that position because they’ll want to allow for a steady, if small changes to pile up and ultimately reverse the current condition of inertness, thus cause the necessary changes that will transform human life on Earth.

 

Other people — generally disposed to view life from a pessimistic viewpoint — will see the trend as leading us to a catastrophic end which the Jews will celebrate at first, but then see themselves consumed by it. And as usual, they will blame the human race, not themselves, for what they wrought.

At last, admission that Ilhan Omar is correct

 Does Israel hypnotize the world, or does it not? It is what US House Representative Ilhan Omar once suggested, for which she was vilified and accused in the most vile of manners of being an antisemite.

 

But would you know it? The people who insulted her and accused her of what she was not, are the ones now eating crow, having been forced to admit that she was correct al along, and they were dead wrong up and down the line. How did this come about?

 

Two peculiarities of the Judeo-Yiddish culture have led to this moment. One peculiarity has to do with the Jewish hunger to monopolize everything, and have it all if and when they can. The other peculiarity being that the culture encourages its followers to enjoy not only what they steal but also the very act of stealing from others and getting away with the crime.

 

Whereas the DNA of humans is made of 4 chemical bases that spell: A, C, G, T, the Judeo-Yiddish DNA seems to be made of 5 chemicals that spell: T, H, I, E, F. So, here is the background scene against which the newest Judeo-Yiddish melodrama of the demons has unfolded:

 

Ever since antiquity, the Jews had it in for Egypt, especially its children. Contrary to the way that Christians and Muslims would do unto others what they want done to them, the Jews want done to the Egyptians what vicious demons and no other creatures would do unto any human.

 

Unable at times to hurt Egypt or its children by taking direct action against them or by inciting a powerful country to do the dirty work for the Jews, the latter turn to the prostituting politicos and journalists who would sell their souls for a Jewish pat on the back, a smile however faint it may be, and an utterance that signifies: Job well done.

 

And so, everyone of these politicos and those pretentious journalists, go to work in their own way tarnishing Egypt’s reputation. They make it look and sound that if Egypt were left to its own devices, it will destroy the world because it can, or because it cannot hold itself together, thus runs the risk of collapsing and taking the world down with it. In fact, a joke was once circulated to the effect that if an astronomer discovered that the sun was about to explode into a Nova, the Egyptian President, whomever he may be, will be blamed for it.

 

Those same charlatans, who are of the demonic variety, did not leave alone a single project that was undertaken by Egypt without predicting it will fail, and in so doing attest to the incompetence and corruption plaguing the country, according to them. The nincompoops have maintained this ignorant positions despite the fact that time after time, one internationally renowned financial institution after another praised Egypt for what it was able to accomplish, even predicted that better days were ahead for that country.

 

Was it the revelation of these new realities that caused the accusers of Ilhan Omar to recant the venom they were spilling earlier? Unfortunately that was not it. Had it been so, the charlatans would have exhibited at least a rudimentary sort of intelligence that could be developed into a useful tool dedicated to the betterment of the human race. Instead, the motivation to recant came from the Jewish perception that something is there which they can steal and get away with. This being their most powerful instinct, they demolished their earlier stance and went for the grand theft.

 

But what does the grand theft consists of, anyway?

 

Well, as hinted by the observation of Ilhan Omar, Israel and the Jews who practically incubated and nurtured the American Congress of zombies, know that hole in the ground so well, they sense the slightest change that takes place in it. The moment they sensed that the Congress was waking up to the reality that Egypt’s progress can no longer be ignored, and that America must change its attitude toward it, the Jews decided this was the plump fruit they cannot forego. And so they decided to steal the success that Egypt is scoring by making the success look like it is of their doing.

 

You’ll discover how they are trying to do it when you read the article which came under the title: “Egypt as the cornerstone of the Middle East’s new regional security architecture,” written by Eran Lerman, and published on August 8, 2022 in the National Interest. Here is how Lerman ended his spew:

 

“The challenge now is to translate the alignment into an effective energy policy, with European and US support, to help Europe break its Russian energy habit. As long as the regional alignment remains in place and the US commits to supporting Israel, Egypt, Greece and Cyprus on this matter, this should not be beyond human capacity. Israel and its Washington allies must play an active role in promoting this agenda. Meanwhile, given the magnitude of the crisis and what is at stake, it may be necessary to seek additional US and EU assistance. Once again, it may be up to Israel to help lobby for this kind of emergency help, given all that could happen if Egypt fell into the wrong hands or its society fell apart. While the specifics of Israel’s role do not need to be publicized, Sisi should be aware of these efforts”.

 

In the name of Israel and all Jews, Lerman has finally admitted they maintain the American Congress in a state of hypnosis and can make it do anything they want. But, of course, Lerman could only do so by himself becoming a disgusting little spew to the end.

A foolish prediction that must never be made. Yet, here it is

 I begin by making a confession. It is this:

 

I am not a doctor; I never studied to be one; I’ve never been one. I don’t even play doctor on television, on live theatre, radio or play-out the role in writing on my blog or anywhere else. But I make an exception this time because I believe there is something important to be said with regard to the matter I’m about to discuss, and there is someone out there who ought to give it serious thought.

 

From my observations of myself as both a forced participant and the afflicted; from my observations of others who suffered the same fate, I’ve learned to spot the (usually) older men and women who suffer from pain in one or both legs.

 

President Joe Biden caught my attention. Repeated analysis of his walk convinced me that he suffers pain at the level of the left hip, left knee or both. Whether or not he controls the pain with painkillers, he will sooner or later have to submit to corrective surgery.

 

Why is the President reluctant to make that decision now?

 

From all indications, President Biden must have reasoned that the brouhaha surrounding his advanced age will be ignited, thus interfere with the campaign that’s unfolding in preparation for the midterm elections. It is normal for him to feel guilty about the possibility of his party and the candidates running on his platform, losing because the electors will think he is no longer up to the job, and neither is the party.

 

It is for this reason that President Biden must have decided to postpone having surgery now, preferring to wait till after the upcoming elections, and do it then. Whether he decides after that to run for the presidency in 2024, will depend on how well he will recover.

 

I happen to think this is the wrong set of decisions to make.

 

As I see things: The best course of action is for the President to go for surgery now even if he will remain bedridden during most of the time that’s left for the campaign to exhaust itself. Because the election is not about him, he will garner a great deal of sympathy, without the electors taking into consideration his competence or lack of it, either the physical or the mental. And that sympathy will rub off on the members of his party who will benefit, without the drawback of the electors being troubled by the President’s health or age.

 

And as we approach 2024, President Biden will have all the options open to him. From using the excuse of his illness to bow out, having saved face and maintained his dignity … to pulling a British style parliamentary coup and deciding – with the stroke of a pen and some luck – who will be given the chance to succeed him in the While House.

 

Here is how such coups are pulled off in Britain and in countries like Canada and Australia:

 

A few months before the end of their mandate, the reigning Prime Minister appoints as acting Prime Minister the person they want to succeed him, having cleared the deck for the appointee to put on a persuasive show till election day. If all goes well, the appointee gets elected, and the outgoing Prime Minister would have scored the coup that will extend his or her legacy a few more years.

 

President Biden can pull-off a maneuver similar to that, thus ascertain that the legacy he forged for himself since his election to the post of Vice-President the first time, will continue well into the future.

He calls a noble experiment the original crime against humanity

 If you’ve been reading Clifford D. May as long as I have, you’ve probably noticed by now that his view of reality is so distorted, you can put him on a farm that’s full of quacking ducks, and he’ll thank you for allowing him to swim with the whales and seals of your privately owned ocean. It is that to Clifford May, a quacking duck is not enough to qualify it as a duck.

 

Under the title: “Why the US should stop subsidizing Tehran’s proxy Lebanon,” Clifford May wrote an article that was published on August 2, 2022 in the Washington Times. In that article, May begins his discussion by asserting the false view that “Lebanon was once a noble experiment”. The false suggestion being that this was the product of European nobility, later messed up by the Arabs and the Muslims.

 

Most likely unaware of the saying that goes: “The tea that calls the kettle black,” Clifford May went on to ignore the history of European Imperialism as it unfolded in the Middle East while observing through the clouded lens of the incorrigible fanatic which he is, that “most Arab and Muslim lands became dictatorships where ethnic and religious minorities — Christians, Jews Kurds, Druze, Baha’i, Yezidis and others — enjoyed no rights or freedoms”.

 

Without mentioning the secret Sykes-Picot Agreement between Britain and France—concluded with the connivance of the Fascists of Italy and Communists of Soviet Russia—the two leading imperial powers of the time, had sowed the seeds of what has been unfolding in that part of the world ever since. Had May bothered to do that, he would have shed much light on the reasons why the purely Arab Agreement of 1943—as noble as it was intended to be—never had the chance to succeed. In fact, it was made to develop into the permanent weapon that has perpetuated crimes against the humans who dared to resist subjugation by the forever-hungry to dominate imperialists and their kinfolks.

 

However, given the recent developments with regard to the way that history has been unfolding, we can only conclude that the human spirit to live freely, remains a force that’s powerful enough to crush any and every attempt made by the evil forces of Imperialism, Fascism, Communism (and now Zionism) to dominate or subjugate the human race. And we don’t have to go far to see an example of this. Look at the recent history of Sri Lanka.

 

This is a country that was not long ago much different from the way that Clifford May is describing Lebanon’s woes today. Even though Israel is not adjacent to Sri Lanka, the long arm of destruction given it by the Princes of Darkness from around the world, has allowed Israel to reach out half the way across the world, and use the billions of dollars-worth of weapons given it free of charge by America, to start and continually feed a civil war by arming both sides in Sri Lanka.

 

When the combatants became exhausted, thus ended their feud, the evildoers became so alarmed, they unleashed the secret weapon they had in their back-pocket. It was a vicious propaganda campaign attributing to China every demonic trick the Imperialists of the past had inflicted on their preys. But the people of Sri Lanka knew better, and took the matter in their own hands. They mounted an uprising and stormed the palaces of the Jewish-installed leaders who betrayed them by selling the country to the Imperialist-Zionist coalition from Satan’s hell.

 

The people of Sri Lanka forced the charlatans to flee the country, and when calm was restored, the country began to negotiate deals with the world institutions and the friendly states that will help it become a normal country again. Right there, you can see that where Clifford May talks about Lebanon’s pitiful decline; it is that his internal lens of distortion is preventing him from seeing what lies as far as the end of his Pinocchio nose.

 

To give a modicum of authority to the tsunami of lies he is about to let loose on his readers, Clifford May invokes the memory of Fouad Ajami whom he calls the great Lebanese-born scholar. I don’t know if May knows this, but Fouad was named after the reigning king of Egypt at the time, and Ajami is a nickname that means “the Persian” in Arabic, meant to identify the Shias of the Muslim world who might wish they were born Sunni. In any case, here is a condensed version of the pack of lies which Clifford May has contributed both by commission and by omission to the current debate — explaining the failure of the European experiment:

 

“Tensions among Lebanon’s communities worsened, leading to a brutal civil war in 1975. Then came the Syrian occupation of Lebanon from 1976 to 2005, and a war against Israel that ran from 1982 to 2000. Still, the experimental state endured, aspiring to become, in the words of Fouad Ajami, ‘a land of enlightenment and commerce.’ Its capital, Beirut, was hailed as the Paris of the Middle East. Then, the revolutionaries who took power in Iran in 1979 provided funds and training to a Shia militia that called itself Hezbollah, ‘The Party of God.’ Hezbollah today is the most heavily armed group in the world. In 2006, the cleric who leads it, presented Lebanon with the gift of two Israeli soldiers kidnapped across an international frontier, leading to another war with Israel. Hezbollah increasingly seized control of the state. Lebanon today is failing — mired in debt, its currency debased, and unable to provide its citizens with such basic services as electricity and garbage removal. The US has been trying to help. For the past 15 years, the strategy of both Republican and Democratic administrations has been to fund, train, and equip the Lebanese Armed Forces so that ‘they could serve as an institutional counterweight to Hezbollah’”.

 

Alarmed for the second time by a trend that promises to destroy their imperialist dreams, the evildoers came up with a new propaganda scheme to put a distance between America and the success for a new life that is increasingly taking hold in Lebanon. It is that the Arabs have once again rallied to help Lebanon become whole. The evildoers reckon that once America succeeds in realizing a success story working with the Arabs, it will want to repeat the experience. And this may well cause America to neglect Israel, with the risk that it may also cut off the umbilical cord by which Israel sucks the blood of America’s taxpayers.

 

And so, Clifford May has joined the voices which tell America that participating in a promising project with the Arabs, is bad for America as much as it is for Israel.

They feed human flesh to the 600-pound gorilla

 It took the combined genius of three satanic charlatans to finally spell out in no uncertain terms, the shameless view that Judaism is the mark of supremacy, and that Israel’s place in the scheme of things can only be at the apogee.

 

The three geniuses are Timothy S. Rich, Madelynn Einhorn, and Tani Washington who spewed their brand of venom in an article that came under the title: “Why do Americans Distrust foreign Aid,” and had it published on July 31, 2022 in The National Interest. The article also came under the subtitle: “While Americans are apprehensive of foreign aid in general, especially showing a preference that has reduced international engagement, aid still serves America’s national interests”.

 

In a nutshell, what are these three stooges saying that’s revolting? They are saying, among other things, that when it comes to serving the American people, America is welcome to remain paralyzed the way that the Judeo-Zionist crime syndicate has trained its politicians to be. But America must unite to serve Israel and the other Jewish causes as efficiently as possible when called upon to serve its Jewish masters. The euphemism the charlatans use to refer to that state of mind, is “bipartisanship,” which precludes any form of opposition to Jewish demands, thus confers absolute dictatorial powers to the will of the Jews, however capriciously such will may be expressed.

 

But how did the crime syndicate tell the three stooges to present their case – the one that’s so mutilated in logic, the mere thought of it, spurs a recoil of normal human beings, similar to seeing a swarm of magots consume the content of a mass grave? Well, the idea was that the instructions must be implemented gently, and done so in three easy steps:

 

In step number one, the stooges must avoid mentioning the 600-pound gorilla in the room, which happens to be the largest component in America’s foreign aid. It is the portion in billions of dollars that goes to Israel year after year with no debate, no question asked and no explanation given.

 

Read the more than 900-word article backward and forward all you want, and you won’t encounter a single indication that a cosmic blackhole is standing near to America, sapping its energy as if eager to turn the big bang expansion of the universe into the big crunch of the diminishing universe. It is that tiny singular Israel is devouring superstar America and enjoying the feast.

 

In step number two, the stooges were told to confuse the readers by showering them with useless statistics, and by making sure to interpret the numbers they cite as being eloquent proof confirming that the will of the American people is on the side of their government screwing its own subjects while at the same time promoting the causes of Israel and the Jews. Here is a taste of how the stooges managed to present that part of their argument:

 

“Despite foreign aid being historically bipartisan in Congress, persistent myths such as the perceived cost of foreign aid stifle public support. Our survey work shows that the public overestimates the amount of aid the US provides, and further suggests that it helps curb concern about aid spending. Surveys often find the public assumes around 25 percent of the budget goes to foreign aid. In reality, foreign aid constitutes about 1 percent of the federal budget. Misperceptions of the amount is a myth about foreign aid contributing to declining support for such efforts. The American public supports aid to democracies more than other regimes”.

 

In step number three, the stooges were told to confuse the very concept of foreign aid by blending it with the issue of illegal immigration, and blaming all matters pertaining to America’s woes in foreign policy on the resulting muddle they would have created themselves and attributed to the foreigners. Here is what the stooges did to implement this instruction:

 

We wanted to identify assumptions about the budget as well as support for aid in addressing one particular challenge: undocumented immigration. We asked, ‘With your best guess, what percentage of the federal budget do you think is spent on foreign aid?’ We find a surprisingly high percentage with little difference between Democrats and Republicans. From there, we asked respondents if they thought America’s current foreign aid expenditures are too much, too little, or about right. Research suggests that when Americans are aware of how little the US spends on aid, opposition to increased spending declines”.

 

Finally, the stooges end their collective dissertation with the following epilog:

 

“While Americans are apprehensive of foreign aid, especially showing a preference that has reduced international engagement, aid still serves America’s national interests. Although correcting misconceptions about the amount of aid may be ideal, policymakers may be better off emphasizing the explicit intent of foreign aid packages, tying this to tangible bipartisan goals, and using their platforms as a means to address concerns of wasteful spending”.

 

What the three stooges are saying here, is that foreign aid is simultaneously bad and good. It is bad when given to the poor countries that need it the most because America gets back nothing in return. In fact, the stooges assert that such is the sentiment of the American people.

 

On the other hand, the bumbling stooges also assert that the American people make common cause with their bipartisan braindead zombies of the Washington Beltway when it comes to mobilizing America’s resources and sending them to promote Israel and all the Jewish causes.

 

What kind of a country America has become, feeding the flesh of its people to the “unseen” gorilla in the room?