It took the combined genius of three satanic charlatans to finally spell out in no uncertain terms, the shameless view that Judaism is the mark of supremacy, and that Israel’s place in the scheme of things can only be at the apogee.
The three geniuses are Timothy S. Rich, Madelynn Einhorn,
and Tani Washington who spewed their brand of venom in an article that came
under the title: “Why do Americans Distrust foreign Aid,” and had it published
on July 31, 2022 in The National Interest. The article also came under the
subtitle: “While Americans are apprehensive of foreign aid in general,
especially showing a preference that has reduced international engagement, aid
still serves America’s national interests”.
In a nutshell, what are these three stooges saying that’s
revolting? They are saying, among other things, that when it comes to serving
the American people, America is welcome to remain paralyzed the way that the
Judeo-Zionist crime syndicate has trained its politicians to be. But America
must unite to serve Israel and the other Jewish causes as efficiently as
possible when called upon to serve its Jewish masters. The euphemism the
charlatans use to refer to that state of mind, is “bipartisanship,” which
precludes any form of opposition to Jewish demands, thus confers absolute
dictatorial powers to the will of the Jews, however capriciously such will may
be expressed.
But how did the crime syndicate tell the three stooges to
present their case – the one that’s so mutilated in logic, the mere thought of
it, spurs a recoil of normal human beings, similar to seeing a swarm of magots
consume the content of a mass grave? Well, the idea was that the instructions must
be implemented gently, and done so in three easy steps:
In step number one, the stooges must avoid mentioning the 600-pound
gorilla in the room, which happens to be the largest component in America’s
foreign aid. It is the portion in billions of dollars that goes to Israel year
after year with no debate, no question asked and no explanation given.
Read the more than 900-word article backward and forward all
you want, and you won’t encounter a single indication that a cosmic blackhole
is standing near to America, sapping its energy as if eager to turn the big
bang expansion of the universe into the big crunch of the diminishing universe.
It is that tiny singular Israel is devouring superstar America and enjoying the
feast.
In step number two, the stooges were told to confuse the
readers by showering them with useless statistics, and by making sure to
interpret the numbers they cite as being eloquent proof confirming that the
will of the American people is on the side of their government screwing its own
subjects while at the same time promoting the causes of Israel and the Jews.
Here is a taste of how the stooges managed to present that part of their
argument:
“Despite foreign aid being historically bipartisan in
Congress, persistent myths such as the perceived cost of foreign aid stifle
public support. Our survey work shows that the public overestimates the amount
of aid the US provides, and further suggests that it helps curb concern about
aid spending. Surveys often find the public assumes around 25 percent of
the budget goes to foreign aid. In reality, foreign aid constitutes about 1
percent of the federal budget. Misperceptions of the amount is a myth about
foreign aid contributing to declining support for such efforts. The American
public supports aid to democracies more than other regimes”.
In step number three, the stooges were told to confuse the
very concept of foreign aid by blending it with the issue of illegal
immigration, and blaming all matters pertaining to America’s woes in foreign
policy on the resulting muddle they would have created themselves and
attributed to the foreigners. Here is what the stooges did to implement this
instruction:
We wanted to identify assumptions about the budget as well
as support for aid in addressing one particular challenge: undocumented
immigration. We asked, ‘With your best guess, what percentage of the federal
budget do you think is spent on foreign aid?’ We find a surprisingly high
percentage with little difference between Democrats and Republicans. From
there, we asked respondents if they thought America’s current foreign aid expenditures
are too much, too little, or about right. Research suggests that when Americans
are aware of how little the US spends on aid, opposition to increased spending
declines”.
Finally, the stooges end their collective dissertation with
the following epilog:
“While Americans are apprehensive of foreign aid,
especially showing a preference that has reduced international engagement, aid
still serves America’s national interests. Although correcting misconceptions
about the amount of aid may be ideal, policymakers may be better off
emphasizing the explicit intent of foreign aid packages, tying this to tangible
bipartisan goals, and using their platforms as a means to address concerns of
wasteful spending”.
What the three stooges are saying here, is that foreign
aid is simultaneously bad and good. It is bad when given to the poor countries
that need it the most because America gets back nothing in return. In fact, the
stooges assert that such is the sentiment of the American people.
On the other hand, the bumbling stooges also assert that the
American people make common cause with their bipartisan braindead zombies of
the Washington Beltway when it comes to mobilizing America’s resources and
sending them to promote Israel and all the Jewish causes.