The phenomenon of whales and dolphins beaching themselves
and dying is heart-wrenching, and there does not seem to be a satisfactory
explanation as to why it happens at all. There is a working theory, however,
which has it that a parasite infects the navigation system inside the brain of
these animals, and pilots them to the beaches where they die. And this is a
perfect metaphor representing what the New-York/Tel-Aviv axis of state
terrorism has been doing to the ships of state that allow it to pilot them to
their eventual doom.
You can see how the parasitic axis of state terrorism
operates by reading the handiwork of its agents, the Israeli Amos Yaldin and
Avner Golov who took the time to write a piece that the Wall Street Journal of
America saw fit to publish on October 16, 2013. The piece has the title: “Four
Possible Deals With Iran” and the subtitle: “An ideal agreement would force Iran
to stop all uranium enrichment. Most of the other alternatives are bad.”
You can tell from the first paragraph that the pilot
commanding the “Western” ships of state is equipped not with a compass that
will sail them into calm waters and a safe harbor, but equipped with an
instrument of terror aimed at Iran – a gadget that will sail them into
turbulent waters and a booby trapped harbor. Just look at these words: “Hopes
are high that the West and Iran
could work out a deal. As the Iranian minister put it: 'We need to move towards
a trust-building road map with the West.' Such talk and the White House desire
to avoid confrontation could result in a deal that would lift sanctions on Iran .” This is
like saying motherhood is bad because the Jew sees it as a threat to his
supremacy.
And so you ask: What is wrong with this in the eyes of the
terrorist state of Israel ?
And the answer is that Yaldin and Golov fear the possibility that the West and Iran may reach
a deal that will be balanced and equitable to all sides. Thus, instead of
letting the negotiations begin normally where everyone will put preliminary
ideas on the table, then proceed normally with everyone parsing their own
position and that of the other side in search of the ideal solution, the
parasite gets ahead of the game, spreads a map on the table showing 4
predetermined trajectories and discusses the merit of each from his point of
view.
Well, why 4 trajectories now when there were only two
options just a few days ago? In fact, Yaldin and Golov mention those two
options in the article: “Bombing Iran's nuclear program or accepting Iran with a
nuclear weapon.” Well, the Israeli terrorist parasites came up with 4 options
now to take into account the one that the Iranian minister spoke about – that
of moving towards a trust-building road map with the West. And so the Israeli
pair made this option the worst of the four to continue leading the Western
ships of state into the turbulent waters where they have been taking them all
along, aiming in the end to reach the booby trapped harbor.
But how do these people change opinion this fast and still
manage to speak about it with a straight face? They do it by describing
themselves as the good guys, and describing the enemy of the day as the bad
guys. Here is how they do it in the case at hand: “Of the four possible
agreements, neither the bad deal nor the deal in phases ... offer an
alternative [because] they place the decision-making power … in the mullah's
hands.”
Never mind that this is conjecture because the talks have
not started yet, no one knows what ideas will develop in the process or how the
discussions will proceed. But the very fact of saying with a sense of caution
that if a certain trajectory is taken, it will result in the mullahs having the
power to decide for themselves, conveys the notion that the Iranians are so
bad, negotiating with them must proceed on the basis that they must not have a
say with regard to matters affecting their destiny. Only a Jew would come up
with an idea like this at the start of negotiations. These people are not
equipped to co-exist in a civilized world, and they need to be educated.
Having made their remark, however, they now say what it is
that they want: “The U.S. ,
Europe and Israel
must privately come to an agreement … get on the same page.” This, of course,
is to maintain Israel
in the position of the parasite that is piloting the Western ships of state.
There remains one more thing to do – motivate the Western
negotiators. And this is how they do it: “a phased agreement would be a defeat.
In dealing with Iran ,
this is the hour of truth for Western diplomacy.” This means, do as we say or
consider yourselves defeated. It is called motivation by cheap psychology.
If you look at this matter closely, my friend, you will see
the possibility that the negotiators may reach the conclusion that making the Middle East a zone that is free of nuclear weapons would
be the ideal solution.
Maybe they will. In any case, let's hope they do, and hope
that America
will be free of the terrorist parasite that is currently piloting it, thus
refrain from torpedoing the idea.