The good news is that there is now proof the people who call
themselves “Jews” are committing identity theft when they claim that they
descended from the Hebrews who used to live in Palestine ,
or from any of the Semitic groups that now populate the Middle
East . You'll find such proof in an article written by Robert Kagan
under the title: “A changing world order?” and published in the Washington Post
on November 15, 2013.
Kagan did not set out to make that case, but made it anyway.
He made it despite himself while trying to articulate several unrelated points.
He wrote like the Jewish American he says he is; but in doing so, demonstrated
to which culture he does not belong. In fact, he is nowhere near being a Hebrew,
and all he managed to show is that he and people like him fantasize about being
of that ethnic group despite the evidence to the contrary which they keep
supplying to the world.
These people have spent a long time and much effort trying
to convince the world they belong in Palestine
because they said they had the right type of blood or genes or chromosomes.
When they failed to prove any of that, they came up with the idea that what
counts is not what the sciences say who or what you are because, you only need
to feel like a Jew to be a Jew. They went on to argue, that this is true
regardless of the physical characteristics that would place you in one ethnic
category or another. Thus, to them, the culture to which they adhered took on a
great importance because they said it was the one thing that made them who they
are – descendents of the Hebrew tribes that belong in Palestine .
And so, this development prompted the people who have a
stake in the matter to ask: How does it all work out with that thing you call
culture? And those who say they are Jews started to talk about rituals and
observances; things that made no sense because to observe the rituals of
Catholicism, for example, would not make you a Roman or an Irishman. And
neither could you claim to be an Arab by observing the rituals of the Muslim
religion. So why would you be a Hebrew by observing the rituals of the Jewish
religion? And the debate ended there.
But then, talking about culture gave a few curious people
the idea of standing back and observing those who call themselves Jews to see
if they have the sense of an ancient culture which they would have if they were
connected to Judaism at least at the spiritual level. Lucky for us, this is the
kind of observation we can engage in by analyzing the Robert Kagan article
where we shall get some useful results.
The one characteristic that a person must have to be
considered connected to an ancient culture, is that they must have a long term
vision of things. Thus, if you see someone habitually make quick judgments
based on the flimsiest of signs that the existing order has just changed, you
can tell that this person has no connection to any of the ancient cultures.
Look now how Robert Kagan begins his article: “reports of America 's
declining power have proved premature. The U.S. economy seems to be on an
upswing … The dollar seems destined to remain the world's reserve currency …
American military power remains unmatched in quantity and quality.”
This astounds you because the lifespan of a nation is measured
in centuries and millenniums. Thus, for him to judge what the status of
American power will be decades or centuries from now based on an economy that
only now “seems” to be on the upswing, and a dollars that only now “seems”
destined to remain a reserve currency, forces you to draw your own conclusion.
It is that this man has no connection – spiritual or otherwise – with the
ancient Hebrew culture. He is an American Jew but not a Hebrew or a Semite of
any kind.
As such, what is it that he is trying to accomplish with
this article? Well, he is trying to put a plan in the public domain – the very
plan which he admits has been strongly rejected by the American people. To
articulate it, he first trashes the ideas “which Fareed Zakaria and the other declinists
touted a few years ago.” He further admits that America has many problems, but
counters by saying that everyone else has problems which are debilitating and
“promise to grow more severe.” He doesn't explain any of that; another way by
which he demonstrates he has no connection with the wisdom of the ancient
cultures.
This done, he addresses the tendency of the American people
to reject the plan that has failed in the past by blaming the whole thing on
what he calls “a period of uncertainty and flux.” He goes on to say that
“President Obama's policies have reflected and encouraged the desire [of
Americans] for contraction and retrenchment.” To counter this, he gives a
version of history that is typical of what the mutilators of history do. To
sound convincing, he advances the notion that the American people may not
understand this well enough. Not only that but “the president himself may not
understand this.” So there you have it; everyone is dumb except the Jewish
imposter.
This brings him to the point where he posits that the whole
world is confused anyway about what should happen from here on: “How should
international affairs be governed and regulated?” And this is something that
will undoubtedly puzzle many in the world who know exactly what they want, are
working hard to get it and in some cases, dying to bring it about. But he goes
on to ask the next question: “And if not the United States , then who?”
With no one in sight to take up the role that America used to
play: “global disorder seems a distinct possibility more than it has since the
1930s” he goes on to say. This date is significant because it was the time when
the Europeans began to reject the view of World Jewry with regard to how the
world should be governed. The result of that rejection has been the Holocaust
that did away with many of the people who used to call themselves Jews at the
time.