Here they are, the newest converts to a vile philosophy of
life, repeating the history of calamities that brought horror to them and to
those who got close to them. They are the ones who call themselves Jews but are
neither Hebrews nor Semites; simply losers from every race who drink not from
the Jim Jones Kool Aid (that had a finality to it) but from the Kool Aid that
promises no end in sight. It is what the rabbis have brewed almost two thousand
years ago with the view of making it last to eternity and beyond.
They are at this time mourning the possibility that they may
again fail to push America into a war that (a) will kill its own children, (b)
kill innocent people half way around the world, (c) continue to deplete America
of its resources and (d) strip America of what it has left in terms of standing
in the world. The Jews are mourning because their two thousand year old
philosophy is based on a religion that goes further back another two thousand
years – to a religion that came out the bowels of the Stone Age bearing the
markings of a primitive and savage brutality.
You get a sense of their disappointment that a resolution
may be at hand when you read two recent articles written by two icons of the
Jewish quest to burn the world and refashion it in a way that will serve the
exclusive interests of the Jews. The first article was written by John Bolton
under the title: “Desperate for a deal – even if it helps Iran get a
bomb” and was published on November 19, 2013 in the New York Post. The second
article was written by Claudia Rosett under the title: “Iran Follows in North Korea 's Nuclear Shoes” and the subtitle:
“Over 24 years, Pyongyang has shown Tehran how to cheat its
way to a nuclear bomb.” It was published on November 20, 2013 in the Wall
Street Journal.
The two articles tackle the same subject, each from a
different angle, yet both starting with the sense of a let down. The authors
see the possibility that the world will avoid the catastrophe they consider to
be manna from the sky; the stuff on which they feed like hyenas feasting on
blood, gore and mutilated bodies. Look how Bolton starts: “Barack Obama seems
poised to reach an agreement with Iran .” And look how Rosett starts:
“Secretary John Kerry emerged … to say that negotiators are 'understanding what
the remaining challenges are.'”
Well, what would you do if you were a John Bolton wishing to
muddy the waters in the hope of causing the failure of the negotiations? The
first thing you do is predict that the negotiations are doomed to fail because
Obama is a fool and the Iranians are demons. In addition to that “the parties'
objectives are utterly incompatible.” And this is because he [Obama] believes
he can “deflect the threat of Iranian nuclear weapons” whereas they believe
that the negotiations “ensure success for that very weapons program.”
Bolton now reveals what it is that he is mourning: “Tehran 's objective is to
eliminate the threat of military strikes.” He goes on: “No one believes he
[Obama] will use force.” So how can Bolton
turn around this trend? There is only one way that he can do it – he must make
a conjecture, however unlikely it may be, then call on Israel 's fifth
column of traitors in the American Congress to start an inquiry. Here is the
conjecture: “Who knows what private assurances Obama or Kerry have given the
ayatollahs?” And here is the call to the traitors: “a fruitful area for
Congressional inquiry.” It's as simple as that in America . Only six words written by
a Jew will set ablaze an otherwise dormant Congress.
Still, the ultimate aim being to motivate the traitors
enough to betray their country once again, and set the stage to send America 's boys and girls to die for the glory of
Israel ,
he must come up with a strong excuse. He finds one – none other than the same
old argument. It is that the situation is an existential one for Israel , he
says. There is one problem however; it is that Israel has been portrayed as the
stud that can do anything. So how to reveal that he is actually impotent? Well,
you blame Obama and Kerry. Here is how you do that: “Israel ,
which Obama is pressuring unmercifully, not just on Iran but also on the Palestinians.”
He goes on: “Kerry squeezed Netanyahu … implicitly
green-lighting a third intifada and continuing European efforts to delegitimize
Israel
in their absence.” And these are the reasons why “Iran
is very close to its goal of neutralizing Israel .” I mean, hey, if there is
an American legislators who will not see red at this panoply of accusations, he
will have to be treated like a prisoner of war, kept in a cage and paraded not
in the streets of Hanoi but the streets of the District of Columbia or whatever
district he or she comes from till they cry uncle or be obliterated
politically. The situation may still be an existential one for Israel but will now be existential for the
traitors who will betray Israel
and Netanyahu instead of betraying America and Obama.
And this brings us to the Rosett article. She spends most of
it discussing North Korea ,
devoting the last two paragraphs only to drawing the parallel with the Iranian
situation. She says this: “Tehran and Pyongyang have a business partnership based on Iran 's oil and North Korea 's weapons programs, the
two states have close diplomatic ties.”
She elaborates: “Iran 's
Ali Khamenei traveled to North
Korea in 1989. There, he expressed his
admiration that 'You have proved you have the power to confront America .' North Korea has
provided a display of how that's done.” And believe it or not, it is based on
that musing alone – something that was said 24 years ago – that Claudia Rosett
concludes: “It does not bode well for the Iran
nuclear talks in Geneva .”
This is her way of saying – like John Bolton – that the
negotiations are doomed to fail when in reality she – like him – is terrified
because she feels that a resolution to the problem is close at hand.