Sunday, July 27, 2014

Here is why the Pogroms and the Holocaust

The question has lingered for a long time as to why there has been pogroms of the Jews throughout history, and why there has been an attempted Final Solution in the form of a Holocaust that came close to being final but did not make it to the finish line. Well, the question is now being answered little by little, day after day by the Jews themselves whose actions give the clearest explanation that any historian could hope for.

The war on Gaza has been going on for nearly three weeks now, and the full extent of the Jewish capacity to commit horror has been shown to a world that used to refuse separating what it sees from what is so obvious, mainly that Israel would not be doing what it is doing were it not Jewish. Thousands upon thousands of pieces of writing in print publications, and as many appearances in the audio-visual media by Jews and their lackeys have painted a full canvas of the Jewish character, as the hoards of pundits spun the Jewish side of the story in a way that unmasked them without them realizing they were stripping themselves naked.

Some of what they wrote and said has been discussed on this website, and there is now an article that was written by Amos Yaldin who was for a time the chief of Israeli military intelligence. Written under the title: “To Save Gaza, Destroy Hamas,” the article was published on July 26, 2014 in the New York Times. The difference between this piece and all the other publications is that the man who headed Israel's intelligence is displaying the philosophy that has been motivating the Jews. Thus, while others – especially those that appear on the Fox News Channel – look not like human mouths uttering words but pipes discharging raw sewage laced with toxic radio active material, this article has a content that can be analyzed and not just discussed.

Sometimes, the best way to understand the philosophy motivating someone is to do what engineers do when they take possession of a piece of equipment that belongs to the opponent; they reverse-engineer it. That is, they start at the end of say, the circuit they study, and work their way backward to its beginning. Here too, we should start from a point that comes near the end of the article. This is it: “...support from the Arab countries would allow for more economic growth in Gaza and for a gradual lifting of the Israeli-Egyptian blockades. It could even open the way for a long-term, post-conflict “Marshall Plan” for Gaza, led by the Arab states and supported by Israel.”

The first thing we must note here is that there is no such a thing as the Israeli-Egyptian blockades because there is no Egyptian blockade of Gaza. Even under normal circumstances, Egypt – like any country – could close its border to anyone without it being a blockade. It would be a blockade if Egypt had closed the maritime and/or aviation routes to Gaza, which it did not whereas Israel did. But the most cynical thing here (a truly Jewish form of cynicism) is that the Israeli plan – one they repeatedly talked about and bragged about – was to make life so miserable for the Gazans that they would want to migrate to Egypt. This would have been like Mexico bombing the people near the American border to force them to flee into the United States, and then accuse America of blockading the refugees of Central and South America. No, the Mexican would not do that, but the Jews tried to do it, and bragged about it even before they completed the plan. Does this merit a pogrom? You judge.

The second thing we note is the talk about a Marshall Plan for Gaza that would involve the Arab countries, and be supported by Israel. Well, the discussion here is about Gaza, and this is why the reference is about Gaza. But this kind of talk started to bounce among the Jewish echo-repeaters with reference to the West Bank – even all of Palestine – since Netanyahu went on an Asian tour trying to drum up the kind of business deals that kept Israel afloat while it was allowed to suckle on the financial blood of Europeans and Americans. In contrast, the Asians who are no fools told the Jewish con artist to go play with himself somewhere else because they do not tolerate moral pornography even from a Jewish clown.

Unable to continue living off the Europeans and the Americans, rebuffed by the Asians who kicked him out of their sight, and still refusing to accept a twelve year old Arab offer to normalize relations with them in return for abandoning the Jewish terrorist dream of acquiring all of Palestine, Netanyahu and his cohorts cooked up a plan containing a promise to let Palestine flourish to its full potential provided that the Arabs agree to pay for the plan by handing the money to Israel that will administer it. What can be more Jewish than that? Well, are we close enough yet to calling for a pogrom?

And this brings us to the beginning of the article where the author says something to the effect that: here is how we assessed the situation in the past, and here is where we speculated about what we could be doing. But as it turned out, we were wrong on all counts in that we did the things which made the situation worse. So let's forget about the past, let's assess the situation once again, and let's speculate more than ever before, after which we should do the following...

And he sets out to tell what needs to be done – which, upon inspection, turns out to be the current Israeli position. And the world is asking these people: What makes you think it is kosher to destroy the organization now ruling Gaza, but not halal to destroy the organization now ruling Israel? Unless you can answer this question in a way that will satisfy the world, you'll be accused of calling for the next Holocaust.