Tuesday, June 9, 2015

A rare Opportunity to fix a broken System

It was a first, like says Chief Justice John Roberts. But it had to happen because the “bold” step he is talking about was both inevitable and overdue. He called it “a president's direct defiance of an act of Congress in the field of foreign affairs.” Maybe so.

But if the protocol says you steer the ship of state by going through the chain of command, and you happen to see a torpedo coming directly at the ship, your human duty is to say damn the torpedo and damn the protocol. You go ahead and steer the ship away from the torpedo's path knowing that some people will have the nerve to call for your head to roll. You damn these people too and move on.

This is what President George W. Bush did in a rare display of a wisdom he is not known to have had – having most certainly borrowed it from somewhere this one time. He damned the protocol and damned the torpedoes by repudiating the law he was coerced (yes, that's coerced) into signing because it had come attached to an appropriations bill that was necessary to have for the smooth sailing of the ship.

Having signed the bill that allowed Jewish children of American parents born in Jerusalem to obtain American passports saying they were born in Israel, George W. Bush said he will not enforce the part about Jerusalem because it interfered with his authority to conduct foreign affairs granted to him by the Constitution. And so said President Barack Obama who thought the same about that part of the law, and refused to enforce it.

This being a clash between the Legislative and Executive branches of the government, the case went to the Supreme Court where it was adjudicated in favor of the Executive. The news item giving a full account of what happened there was written by Adan Liptak under the title: “Supreme Court Backs White House on Jerusalem Passport Dispute” and was published on June 8, 2015 in the New York Times.

Whatever the merits on either side of this issue, what is more important to the ship of state is the fact that the issue arose in the first place because an element of coercion was there and was used in the process of making the law. And the sad truth is that when you add coercion to democracy, you create an authoritarian system that is as horrible as any but that is difficult to confront because it is wearing the clothes of a democracy.

In fact, it is easier to tell Vladimir Putin of Russia he rules by authoritarian decrees, and easier to work on educating him about the merits of democracy than it is to tell John Boehner his legislative assembly is run not by the democratic process but by the dictates of a non-elected lobby whose interest is to serve the people and organizations it represents. Also, you will never convince John Boehner that it will serve the nation better to modernize the method by which the laws are made, thus serve the American people who voted him and his colleagues into office.

The good thing about the Jerusalem case going to the Supreme Court and being adjudicated by it -- is that the extent to which the democratic system was eroded in America – has finally been revealed. This should prompt the Justices to look out for the cases that will allow them to pronounce themselves on this subject again.

That is important because it is one thing to horse-trade in the manner of: “You vote for the wheat farmers of my state, and I'll vote for the coal miners of your state;” it is another thing to coerce the President of the Republic with something like: “You give the Israel lobby what it wants, or we shut down the business of America.” Well, only one thing can be said about that: Putin's 5,000 nuclear warheads could not damage America as much as a criminal coercion that comes disguised as an exercise in democracy.

The Supreme Court taking up new cases will fix the broken system in America; also do something good for the Jews. For this to happen, we must be mindful of the fact that when an Israeli or a Jewish American says 'do this thing because it will fight anti-Semitism,' the thing will serve to flare up anti-Semitism instead of fighting it. And you have the mayor of Jerusalem calling on President Obama to recognize his city as the capital of Israel, a sure sign that this will increase the incidents of anti-Semitism rather than subside or eliminate them.

The Supreme Court of the United States has a golden opportunity to do something good for America, for the Jews worldwide and for Israel. Let's hope it will seize it.