Wednesday, June 10, 2015

To compare or not to compare

Jewish American pundits will have to make up their mind as to how they want the debate to proceed with regard to subjects that relate to the Middle East. They cannot, on the one hand, bray “you can't compaaaare,” and on the other hand compare Israel with other countries; something they do incessantly. Worse, they don't even make legitimate comparisons but make the kind that fails the test when scrutinized.

An example of that is the article which came under the title: “The ugly effort to boycott Israel,” written by Richard Cohen and published on June 8, 2015 in the Washington Post. The word “ugly” in the title tell you that the author is enraged about something. You discover as you read the article that he is so confused about two realities, he is comparing not oranges with apples but lemons with pineapples.

Richard Cohen is fuming because he says that Stephane Richard who is the CEO of a French telecom company called Orange, once said that he would end his company's relationship with its Israeli partner … but could not because of contractual obligations. And that's only half the story according to Cohen because the other half is that the same company is also operating in Egypt where things are worse than in Israel, yet the French CEO expressed no desire to pull out of Egypt.

Cohen says he is tempted to call that stance anti-Semitism, but shies away from it “out of respect for the awesome power of the word and in honor of its victims.” The people who know the Jewish narrative know he means to say that Jews are Semites even though most of them look like anything but Semitic. As to the people who do not know the Jewish narrative but know something about the history of human evolution ... well, these people will experience puzzlement knowing that the Arabs (Egyptians among them) are true Semites and yet, the company is not pulling out of Egypt. So how can this be an expression of anti-Semitism?

To make his point, Cohen cites all the things that could be vexing Monsieur Richard about Israel, and he says he agrees with him on all those things. Among them are Israel's settlements policy, the treatment of Palestinians in the West Bank, the strengthening of the religious parties in Israel, a government that is too right-wing and too anti-Arab. And so he sets out to compare these Israeli shortcomings with those of Egypt.

He begins his list of Egypt's shortcomings – which he calls imperfections – by citing the criticism that was leveled against that country by the Obama administration for violating human rights. He goes on to say that a report of the State Department mentions violence against women, sexual harassment and female genital mutilation. There is also mention of police brutality at a time when the Revolution was raging, and another time when soccer hooligans rioted, causing the death of several dozen people.

From the comparison between Egypt and Israel, Cohen concludes that “Israel has its flaws, but nothing compared to this.” In fact, to make clear what he means, he states the following: “Israel has such lofty goals, such splendid aspirations, that it is forever disappointing to some observers.” But what is it that disappoints the observers? Well, he says, some Israeli policies are repugnant. The Israelis also have a cabinet which includes a justice minister that's as bad as the American Republican Party.

And then it dawns on you, the reader, that in talking about Egypt, Richard Cohen mentioned what a third party said about it. But when it came to Israel, he avoided mentioning the numerous reports that came out over the years, listing such savage horrors as the shooting of young Palestinians, and the harvesting of their internal organs to sell on the local and the world markets.

Of course, someone that is capable of such beastly activities considers it normal behavior to go in the middle of the night and bomb women and their babies asleep in their homes. Besides that, the list of modern Jewish horrors is rivaled only by the list of ancient horrors – called Old Testament – compiled in the form of tenets that make up the Jewish religion.

And this explains why Jews, such as Richard Cohen, are incapable of understanding that they cannot compare their occupation of the Palestinian people with whatever happens somewhere else. The first is a relationship between predator and prey; the second is a relationship between parents – that may be strict or even harsh – and their offspring.